{"title":"Data-driven Urban Design","authors":"Jeroen van Ameijde","doi":"10.47982/spool.2022.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nicholas Negroponte and MIT’s Architecture Machine Group speculated in the 1970s about computational processes that were open to participation, incorporating end-user preferences and democratizing urban design. Today’s ‘smart city’ technologies, using the monitoring of people’s movement and activity patterns to offer more effective and responsive services, might seem like contemporary interpretations of Negroponte’s vision, yet many of the collectors of user information are disconnected from urban policy making. This article presents a series of theoretical and procedural experiments conducted through academic research and teaching, developing user-driven generative design processes in the spirit of ‘The Architecture Machine’. It explores how new computational tools for site analysis and monitoring can enable data-driven urban place studies, and how these can be connected to generative strategies for public spaces and environments at various scales. By breaking down these processes into separate components of gathering, analysing, translating and implementing data, and conceptualizing them in relation to urban theory, it is shown how data-driven urban design processes can be conceived as an open-ended toolkit to achieve various types of user-driven outcomes. It is argued that architects and urban designers are uniquely situated to reflect on the benefits and value systems that control data-driven processes, and should deploy these to deliver more resilient, liveable and participatory urban spaces.","PeriodicalId":52253,"journal":{"name":"Spool","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spool","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/spool.2022.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nicholas Negroponte and MIT’s Architecture Machine Group speculated in the 1970s about computational processes that were open to participation, incorporating end-user preferences and democratizing urban design. Today’s ‘smart city’ technologies, using the monitoring of people’s movement and activity patterns to offer more effective and responsive services, might seem like contemporary interpretations of Negroponte’s vision, yet many of the collectors of user information are disconnected from urban policy making. This article presents a series of theoretical and procedural experiments conducted through academic research and teaching, developing user-driven generative design processes in the spirit of ‘The Architecture Machine’. It explores how new computational tools for site analysis and monitoring can enable data-driven urban place studies, and how these can be connected to generative strategies for public spaces and environments at various scales. By breaking down these processes into separate components of gathering, analysing, translating and implementing data, and conceptualizing them in relation to urban theory, it is shown how data-driven urban design processes can be conceived as an open-ended toolkit to achieve various types of user-driven outcomes. It is argued that architects and urban designers are uniquely situated to reflect on the benefits and value systems that control data-driven processes, and should deploy these to deliver more resilient, liveable and participatory urban spaces.
Nicholas Negroponte和麻省理工学院的建筑机器小组在20世纪70年代推测了开放参与的计算过程,结合了最终用户的偏好,并使城市设计民主化。今天的“智能城市”技术,利用对人们行动和活动模式的监测,提供更有效、更快速的服务,似乎是对内格罗蓬特愿景的当代诠释,但许多用户信息的收集者与城市政策制定脱节。本文通过学术研究和教学进行了一系列理论和程序实验,以“建筑机器”的精神开发了用户驱动的生成设计过程。它探讨了用于场地分析和监测的新计算工具如何能够实现数据驱动的城市场所研究,以及这些工具如何与各种规模的公共空间和环境的生成策略相联系。通过将这些过程分解为收集、分析、翻译和实施数据的单独组成部分,并将其与城市理论相结合,展示了如何将数据驱动的城市设计过程视为一个开放式工具包,以实现各种类型的用户驱动结果。有人认为,建筑师和城市设计师处于独特的位置,能够反思控制数据驱动过程的利益和价值体系,并应部署这些系统,以提供更具弹性、宜居和参与性的城市空间。