Teacher Education in India’s National Education Policy 2020: Knowledge Traditions, Global Discourses and National Regulations

Q3 Social Sciences Contemporary Education Dialogue Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1177/09731849231168728
G. Sharma, Radhika Mittal, Zayan
{"title":"Teacher Education in India’s National Education Policy 2020: Knowledge Traditions, Global Discourses and National Regulations","authors":"G. Sharma, Radhika Mittal, Zayan","doi":"10.1177/09731849231168728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article engages with the teacher education (TE) reform approach adopted in India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. It locates the policy recommendations in the context and challenges of TE in India and makes sense of the NEP’s vision for the domain. It examines the knowledge traditions and global education policy (GEP) discourses that underlie the proposed reforms, and the translation of the core reform ideas in the national regulatory framework for implementation. The first part of the findings identifies the knowledge traditions and influences of GEP inherent in the policy and argues that NEP’s reform approach is an assemblage of fundamentally inconsistent discourses. The second part examines the regulatory norms and standards of the NEP-recommended TE programme to understand what makes it distinct as compared to similar ongoing programmes. Based on the analysis, the article argues that the proposed new programme is a tweaked version of India’s conventional TE approaches.","PeriodicalId":37486,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Education Dialogue","volume":"20 1","pages":"256 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Education Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09731849231168728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article engages with the teacher education (TE) reform approach adopted in India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. It locates the policy recommendations in the context and challenges of TE in India and makes sense of the NEP’s vision for the domain. It examines the knowledge traditions and global education policy (GEP) discourses that underlie the proposed reforms, and the translation of the core reform ideas in the national regulatory framework for implementation. The first part of the findings identifies the knowledge traditions and influences of GEP inherent in the policy and argues that NEP’s reform approach is an assemblage of fundamentally inconsistent discourses. The second part examines the regulatory norms and standards of the NEP-recommended TE programme to understand what makes it distinct as compared to similar ongoing programmes. Based on the analysis, the article argues that the proposed new programme is a tweaked version of India’s conventional TE approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度2020年国家教育政策中的教师教育:知识传统、全球话语和国家法规
本文探讨了印度2020年国家教育政策(NEP)中采用的教师教育(TE)改革方法。它将政策建议置于印度TE的背景和挑战中,并解释了NEP对该领域的愿景。它考察了作为拟议改革基础的知识传统和全球教育政策(GEP)话语,以及将核心改革理念转化为国家实施监管框架。研究结果的第一部分确定了该政策中固有的知识传统和全球经济政策的影响,并认为新经济政策的改革方法是一个从根本上不一致的话语的集合。第二部分审查新经济政策建议的技术培训方案的管理规范和标准,以了解与类似的正在进行的方案相比,是什么使其与众不同。基于这一分析,这篇文章认为,拟议中的新项目是印度传统教育方法的一个微调版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Education Dialogue
Contemporary Education Dialogue Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Contemporary Education Dialogue serves as an independent open forum for researchers and practitioners to sustain a critical engagement with issues in education by engendering a reflective space that nurtures the discipline and promotes inter-disciplinary perspectives. The peer-reviewed journal allows for a refinement of theoretical and practical basis for improving the quality of education, furthering the opportunity to directly create reflective classroom practices. It invites contributions by academicians, policy-makers and practitioners on various topics related to education, particularly elementary education. Discussions and responses to published articles are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Graphical Literacy Using School Students’ Comprehension Strategies Social Science Teacher? Anyone 
Can Become’: Examining 
Professional Subject Identity of Social Science Teachers in India Feminist Pedagogy in Women’s Studies Classrooms: Some Critical Reflections Language as a Tool for Inclusive and Equitable School Education: A Critical Review of NEP 2020 New Education Policy and Higher Education Reforms in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1