Cost–Utility analysis for rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 antigen detection assay in comparison versus real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease -2019

IF 1 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_301_22
R. Mungmunpuntipantip, V. Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Cost–Utility analysis for rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 antigen detection assay in comparison versus real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease -2019","authors":"R. Mungmunpuntipantip, V. Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_301_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is still spreading. As a result, rapid, simple, and accurate diagnostics to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are urgently needed. For the diagnosis of COVID-19 cases, the performance characteristics of the quick SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test should be investigated and compared to the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. The utility of the antigen detection test is reported from field evaluation. However, an interesting concern is on the utility of the test. Methods: Here, the authors perform a cost utility analysis to appraise rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison versus real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19. Results: According to the analysis, the cost per utility of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay is 3.24 times less than that of comparison versus real-time RT-PCR assay. Conclusion: Hence, it can conclude that rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay is appropriate for using for diagnosis of COVID-19 in term of cost–utility.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_301_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is still spreading. As a result, rapid, simple, and accurate diagnostics to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are urgently needed. For the diagnosis of COVID-19 cases, the performance characteristics of the quick SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test should be investigated and compared to the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. The utility of the antigen detection test is reported from field evaluation. However, an interesting concern is on the utility of the test. Methods: Here, the authors perform a cost utility analysis to appraise rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison versus real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19. Results: According to the analysis, the cost per utility of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay is 3.24 times less than that of comparison versus real-time RT-PCR assay. Conclusion: Hence, it can conclude that rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay is appropriate for using for diagnosis of COVID-19 in term of cost–utility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年重症急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2抗原快速检测与实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测在实验室诊断中的成本-效用分析
背景:2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)的全球大流行仍在蔓延。因此,迫切需要快速、简单、准确的诊断方法来诊断严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)感染。为了诊断新冠肺炎病例,应调查快速SARS-CoV-2抗原检测试验的性能特征,并将其与金标准实时逆转录聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)试验进行比较。抗原检测测试的实用性是根据现场评估报告的。然而,一个有趣的问题是测试的效用。方法:在此,作者进行成本效用分析,以评估快速SARS-CoV-2抗原检测方法与实时RT-PCR方法在新冠肺炎实验室诊断中的比较。结果:根据分析,快速检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗原的每次使用成本是实时RT-PCR检测的3.24倍。结论:因此,从成本效益角度来看,快速SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法适用于诊断新冠肺炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
24
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation Abutment Stress Shielding Distribution on Titanium Alloy Biomaterial under Bruxism Chewing Cycles: Three-dimensional Finite Element Chewing Simulation Information and Information Technology Needed by Adults, Families, and Managers of Elderly Centers Evaluation of Warfarin-associated Major Hemorrhage in Hospitalized Patients Correlation of Genetic Mutation in Rv0676 and Drug Susceptibility Patterns in Tuberculosis Isolates Nepeta macrosiphon Essential Oil Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1