{"title":"Big Data, Small Pickings: Predicting the Stock Market with Google Trends","authors":"W. Fong","doi":"10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Big data such as Google Trends has stimulated much interest in the use of search query volumes for predicting social, business, and financial market trends. A recent paper by Preis, Moat, and Stanley [2013] claimed that a simple trading strategy using the Google Trends keyword debt powerfully predicts the Dow Jones Industrial Average stock index one week ahead and outperforms the buy-and-hold strategy by a factor of 20. Using the same sample period used by Preis, Moat, and Stanley, we show that debt completely loses its predictive power once look-ahead bias is eliminated. We find a similar result with a more recent sample period, from 2011 to 2016. Search terms that do outperform the buy-and-hold strategy generally have no economic meaning and are most likely spurious.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Big data such as Google Trends has stimulated much interest in the use of search query volumes for predicting social, business, and financial market trends. A recent paper by Preis, Moat, and Stanley [2013] claimed that a simple trading strategy using the Google Trends keyword debt powerfully predicts the Dow Jones Industrial Average stock index one week ahead and outperforms the buy-and-hold strategy by a factor of 20. Using the same sample period used by Preis, Moat, and Stanley, we show that debt completely loses its predictive power once look-ahead bias is eliminated. We find a similar result with a more recent sample period, from 2011 to 2016. Search terms that do outperform the buy-and-hold strategy generally have no economic meaning and are most likely spurious.