To experimental study of performance evaluation of masonry brick bond in shear and compression in comparison

IF 0.6 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Measurements in Engineering Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI:10.21595/jme.2022.22559
N. Abbas, M. Yousaf, M. Akbar, Pan Huali, M. Usman Yousaf, Ou Guoqiang
{"title":"To experimental study of performance evaluation of masonry brick bond in shear and compression in comparison","authors":"N. Abbas, M. Yousaf, M. Akbar, Pan Huali, M. Usman Yousaf, Ou Guoqiang","doi":"10.21595/jme.2022.22559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of a structure is prohibitively expensive due to high material and labour expenses. Still, the production of cement, which is the most widely used binding substance in construction, results in the emission of a large amount of CO2 into the atmosphere. It has only recently been discovered that Pakistan is short of approximately 9 million residential constructions. Thus, there is a great need for cost-effective and energy-efficient masonry construction because of economic and environmental concerns. Rat-trap masonry bond creates a cavity in the wall, which serves as both thermal insulation and a cost-saving measure. Because of the inherent property of rat-trap masonry bond, a cavity is formed in the wall, which not only serves as thermal insulation for the interior but is also cost-effective It has been observed that approximately 26.11 % of the total construction cost, comprising of labor and material, can be curtailed by adopting the rat-trap bonding technique. Rat-trap bond construction is recognized as a greener and more sustainable alternative to conventional brick bonds. A comparative study of the structural behavior of the rat-trap and conventionally used English bond has been conducted. 72 prisms of rat-trap bond and English bond from three sources of bricks were tested under compression load at the ages of 28 and 56 days. The same number of prisms were tested under diagonal tension load at both ages. 18 triplet prisms from all sources of bricks were tested for shear bond strength without lateral load, whereas 5 triplet prisms from every brick source were tested with a set of lateral pre-compression loading of 29 psi, 87 psi, and 145 psi. The results show that the rat-trap bond has much higher compressive and shear strengths than the English bond.","PeriodicalId":42196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Measurements in Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Measurements in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21595/jme.2022.22559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The construction of a structure is prohibitively expensive due to high material and labour expenses. Still, the production of cement, which is the most widely used binding substance in construction, results in the emission of a large amount of CO2 into the atmosphere. It has only recently been discovered that Pakistan is short of approximately 9 million residential constructions. Thus, there is a great need for cost-effective and energy-efficient masonry construction because of economic and environmental concerns. Rat-trap masonry bond creates a cavity in the wall, which serves as both thermal insulation and a cost-saving measure. Because of the inherent property of rat-trap masonry bond, a cavity is formed in the wall, which not only serves as thermal insulation for the interior but is also cost-effective It has been observed that approximately 26.11 % of the total construction cost, comprising of labor and material, can be curtailed by adopting the rat-trap bonding technique. Rat-trap bond construction is recognized as a greener and more sustainable alternative to conventional brick bonds. A comparative study of the structural behavior of the rat-trap and conventionally used English bond has been conducted. 72 prisms of rat-trap bond and English bond from three sources of bricks were tested under compression load at the ages of 28 and 56 days. The same number of prisms were tested under diagonal tension load at both ages. 18 triplet prisms from all sources of bricks were tested for shear bond strength without lateral load, whereas 5 triplet prisms from every brick source were tested with a set of lateral pre-compression loading of 29 psi, 87 psi, and 145 psi. The results show that the rat-trap bond has much higher compressive and shear strengths than the English bond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对砌体砖粘结剂的抗剪和抗压性能评价进行了试验研究
由于高昂的材料和人工费用,建筑结构的成本高得令人望而却步。尽管如此,作为建筑中最广泛使用的结合物质,水泥的生产会导致大量的二氧化碳排放到大气中。直到最近才发现,巴基斯坦缺少大约900万个住宅建筑。因此,由于经济和环境问题,非常需要具有成本效益和节能的砌体建筑。捕鼠器砌体粘合剂在墙壁上形成一个空洞,既可以隔热又可以节省成本。由于捕鼠器砌体粘结的固有特性,在墙体上形成一个空腔,不仅可以起到内部隔热的作用,而且具有成本效益。据观察,采用捕鼠器粘结技术可以节省大约26.11%的总建筑成本,包括人工和材料。鼠夹粘接被认为是一种比传统砖粘接更环保、更可持续的选择。本文对捕鼠器和常用的英语键的结构行为进行了比较研究。在28和56日龄时,对3种来源砖的鼠夹粘结剂和英氏粘结剂72个棱镜进行了压缩载荷试验。在对角拉伸载荷作用下,两个年龄段的棱镜数量相同。在没有侧向载荷的情况下,测试了来自所有砖源的18个三联棱镜的剪切粘结强度,而来自每个砖源的5个三联棱镜在一系列侧向预压缩载荷(29 psi、87 psi和145 psi)下进行了测试。结果表明,捕鼠器粘结剂的抗压和抗剪强度明显高于英制粘结剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Measurements in Engineering
Journal of Measurements in Engineering ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A train F-TR lock anti-lifting detection method based on improved BP neural network YOLOv3-MSSA based hot spot defect detection for photovoltaic power stations Displacement analysis and numerical simulation of pile-anchor retaining structure in deep foundation pit Static transmission error measurement of various gear-shaft systems by finite element analysis Test and application of movable steel barrier with grade SB light composite corrugated beam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1