Influence of dental education on the perception of overjet

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontic Waves Pub Date : 2020-07-19 DOI:10.1080/13440241.2020.1791649
Fumihiko Nakamura, N. Sakai, N. Sako, W. Tome, N. Kitai
{"title":"Influence of dental education on the perception of overjet","authors":"Fumihiko Nakamura, N. Sakai, N. Sako, W. Tome, N. Kitai","doi":"10.1080/13440241.2020.1791649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of the present study was to investigate the degree of overjet deemed by subjects without dental education as needing orthodontic treatment, to determine whether dental education influences the perception of overjet, and to determine whether the degree of overjet considered to require orthodontic treatment changes after subjects acquire dental education. Materials and methods Ninety-six women in their first year immediately after entering a school for dental hygienists (first-year group), 34 women in their third year of education (third-year group), and 14 orthodontists (5 men and 9 women; Orthodontist group) were included. Follow-up investigation for the first-year group was conducted after they entered their third year. The dental models had varying overjet from −2.0 mm to +7.0 mm with differences of 1.0 mm each. The models were shown to each subject in random order, and each subject was asked to determine whether or not the models required orthodontic treatment. Results The ratio of subjects in whom orthodontic treatment was deemed to be necessary for overjet of 4.0 and 5.0 mm was significantly higher in the Orthodontist group than in the first- and third-year group, respectively. The ratio of subjects who deemed orthodontic treatment necessary for overjet of 0.0 mm in the third-year group was significantly higher than that in the first-year group both in the cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Conclusions The dental education does appear to influence the perception of edge-to-edge occlusion.","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"79 1","pages":"89 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13440241.2020.1791649","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13440241.2020.1791649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of the present study was to investigate the degree of overjet deemed by subjects without dental education as needing orthodontic treatment, to determine whether dental education influences the perception of overjet, and to determine whether the degree of overjet considered to require orthodontic treatment changes after subjects acquire dental education. Materials and methods Ninety-six women in their first year immediately after entering a school for dental hygienists (first-year group), 34 women in their third year of education (third-year group), and 14 orthodontists (5 men and 9 women; Orthodontist group) were included. Follow-up investigation for the first-year group was conducted after they entered their third year. The dental models had varying overjet from −2.0 mm to +7.0 mm with differences of 1.0 mm each. The models were shown to each subject in random order, and each subject was asked to determine whether or not the models required orthodontic treatment. Results The ratio of subjects in whom orthodontic treatment was deemed to be necessary for overjet of 4.0 and 5.0 mm was significantly higher in the Orthodontist group than in the first- and third-year group, respectively. The ratio of subjects who deemed orthodontic treatment necessary for overjet of 0.0 mm in the third-year group was significantly higher than that in the first-year group both in the cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Conclusions The dental education does appear to influence the perception of edge-to-edge occlusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙学教育对溢牙认知的影响
摘要目的本研究的目的是调查未接受牙科教育的受试者认为需要正畸治疗的过度兴奋程度,确定牙科教育是否影响过度兴奋的感觉,并确定受试者接受牙科教育后认为需要正畸处理的过度兴奋度是否发生变化。材料和方法96名刚进入牙科保健师学校一年级的女性(一年级组)、34名刚进入教育三年级(三年级组)的女性和14名正畸医生(5名男性和9名女性;正畸医生组)被纳入研究。第一年组的随访调查是在他们进入第三年后进行的。牙齿模型的覆盖范围从-2.0 mm到+7.0 mm不等,各有1.0 mm的差异。将模型按随机顺序展示给每个受试者,并要求每个受试人确定模型是否需要正畸治疗。结果正畸医生组认为4.0和5.0mm的覆盖需要正畸治疗的受试者比例分别显著高于第一年和第三年组。在横截面和纵向数据中,第三年组认为0.0 mm的覆盖需要正畸治疗的受试者比例显著高于第一年组。结论牙科教育确实会影响边缘对边缘咬合的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Condylectomy as a treatment approach to condylar hyperplasia Effectiveness of a fluoride-releasing orthodontic primer in reducing demineralization around brackets – a systematic review Updates on periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics Incidence of impacted teeth requiring fenestration, traction, and orthodontic treatment in Japan Bond strength of orthodontic buttons on clear aligner materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1