Modeling, models, and knowledge exchange in early modern Japan

Q1 Arts and Humanities Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1086/707114
C. Guth
{"title":"Modeling, models, and knowledge exchange in early modern Japan","authors":"C. Guth","doi":"10.1086/707114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reflects on the historical and cultural contingency of the model both as an analytical category and as a material thing in the context of Japan, with particular reference to its role in diverse forms of knowledge exchange in the early modern era, a period roughly coinciding with the rule of the Tokugawa shoguns from 1603 to 1867. It is intended as a brief intervention, not an encyclopedic survey of this complex and understudied subject. Models exist in many forms in Japan, both twoand three-dimensional, but also embodied, and have operated within multiple and sometimes overlapping social and cultural processes that constructed their codes, values, and uses. Their study is complicated, however, by the fact that neither their forms nor the language used to refer to them have remained constant across historical periods, raising fundamental questions about what constituted a “model” in the early modern era. Mokei, for instance, which most closely approximates the English term “model,” is a modern coinage that gained currency in the late nineteenth century in response to the practical need for a classificatory category for the reduced-scale models of historic buildings that became fixtures in the international expositions in which Japan participated. These were primarily ethnographic specimens that made visible the distance between Japanese and Western architectural materials, techniques, and styles. The word mokei replaced an older term, hinagata, which was commonly applied to models of many kinds, but especially printed books that enjoyed wide circulation from the seventeenth century featuring pictorial models of fashionable garment designs. Yet","PeriodicalId":39613,"journal":{"name":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","volume":"71-72 1","pages":"253 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707114","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/707114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay reflects on the historical and cultural contingency of the model both as an analytical category and as a material thing in the context of Japan, with particular reference to its role in diverse forms of knowledge exchange in the early modern era, a period roughly coinciding with the rule of the Tokugawa shoguns from 1603 to 1867. It is intended as a brief intervention, not an encyclopedic survey of this complex and understudied subject. Models exist in many forms in Japan, both twoand three-dimensional, but also embodied, and have operated within multiple and sometimes overlapping social and cultural processes that constructed their codes, values, and uses. Their study is complicated, however, by the fact that neither their forms nor the language used to refer to them have remained constant across historical periods, raising fundamental questions about what constituted a “model” in the early modern era. Mokei, for instance, which most closely approximates the English term “model,” is a modern coinage that gained currency in the late nineteenth century in response to the practical need for a classificatory category for the reduced-scale models of historic buildings that became fixtures in the international expositions in which Japan participated. These were primarily ethnographic specimens that made visible the distance between Japanese and Western architectural materials, techniques, and styles. The word mokei replaced an older term, hinagata, which was commonly applied to models of many kinds, but especially printed books that enjoyed wide circulation from the seventeenth century featuring pictorial models of fashionable garment designs. Yet
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本近代早期的造型、模型和知识交流
本文以日本为背景,以分析范畴和实物的形式,反思了该模型的历史和文化偶然性,特别是它在近代早期各种形式的知识交流中的作用,这一时期大致与1603年至1867年德川幕府的统治相吻合。这是一个简短的干预,而不是对这个复杂和研究不足的主题进行百科全书式的调查。模型在日本以多种形式存在,既有二维的,也有三维的,但也有具体化的,并在构建其代码、价值观和用途的多重、有时重叠的社会和文化过程中运作。然而,他们的研究很复杂,因为无论是他们的形式还是用来指代他们的语言,在各个历史时期都保持不变,这引发了关于现代早期“模式”的根本问题。例如,Mokei最接近英语中的“模型”一词,是一种现代货币,在19世纪末流行起来,以回应对历史建筑缩小规模模型分类的实际需求,这些模型成为日本参加的国际博览会的固定展品。这些主要是人种学标本,使人们可以看到日本和西方建筑材料、技术和风格之间的距离。mokei一词取代了一个更古老的术语hinagata,hinagata通常用于许多类型的模特,但尤其是从17世纪开始广泛流通的印刷书籍,这些书籍以时尚服装设计的图片模特为特色。然而
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Res is a journal of anthropology and comparative aesthetics dedicated to the study of the object, in particular cult and belief objects and objects of art. The journal brings together, in an anthropological perspective, contributions by philosophers, art historians, archaeologists, critics, linguists, architects, artists, and others. Its field of inquiry is open to all cultures, regions, and historical periods. Res also seeks to make available textual and iconographic documents of importance for the history and theory of the arts.
期刊最新文献
Five invisible lines, before and after the Reformation The myth of Iphigenia in fourth-century funerary vases of southern Italy Nose ornaments When shrines and images grow tired A wooden hand from Easter Island (Rapa Nui), part I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1