A Special Case of Brennan's Index for Tests That Aim to Select a Limited Number of Students: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1111/emip.12528
Serkan Arikan, Eren Can Aybek
{"title":"A Special Case of Brennan's Index for Tests That Aim to Select a Limited Number of Students: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study","authors":"Serkan Arikan,&nbsp;Eren Can Aybek","doi":"10.1111/emip.12528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many scholars compared various item discrimination indices in real or simulated data. Item discrimination indices, such as item-total correlation, item-rest correlation, and IRT item discrimination parameter, provide information about individual differences among all participants. However, there are tests that aim to select a very limited number of students, examinees, or candidates for allocated schools and job positions. Thus, there is a need to evaluate the performances of CTT and IRT item discrimination indices when the test purpose is to select a limited number of students. The purpose of the current Monte Carlo study is to evaluate item discrimination indices in the case of selecting a limited number of high-achieving students. The results showed that a special case of Brennan's index, <i>B</i><sub>10–90</sub>, provided more accurate information for this specific test purpose. Additionally, the effects of various factors, such as test length, ability distributions of examinees, and item difficulty variance on item discrimination indices were investigated. The performance of each item discrimination index is discussed in detail.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"41 4","pages":"35-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many scholars compared various item discrimination indices in real or simulated data. Item discrimination indices, such as item-total correlation, item-rest correlation, and IRT item discrimination parameter, provide information about individual differences among all participants. However, there are tests that aim to select a very limited number of students, examinees, or candidates for allocated schools and job positions. Thus, there is a need to evaluate the performances of CTT and IRT item discrimination indices when the test purpose is to select a limited number of students. The purpose of the current Monte Carlo study is to evaluate item discrimination indices in the case of selecting a limited number of high-achieving students. The results showed that a special case of Brennan's index, B10–90, provided more accurate information for this specific test purpose. Additionally, the effects of various factors, such as test length, ability distributions of examinees, and item difficulty variance on item discrimination indices were investigated. The performance of each item discrimination index is discussed in detail.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以选拔有限数量学生为目的的测试的布伦南指数的一个特例:蒙特卡洛模拟研究
许多学者比较了真实或模拟数据中的各种项目识别指标。项目识别指标,如项目-总相关、项目-休息相关和IRT项目识别参数,提供了所有参与者之间个体差异的信息。然而,也有一些考试旨在为分配的学校和工作岗位选择数量非常有限的学生、考生或候选人。因此,当测试目的是选择有限数量的学生时,有必要评估CTT和IRT项目区分指标的表现。本蒙特卡罗研究的目的是评估在选择有限数量的高成就学生的情况下的项目歧视指标。结果表明,布伦南指数的一个特例B10-90为这个特定的测试目的提供了更准确的信息。此外,还考察了考题长度、考生能力分布、试题难度方差等因素对试题辨析指标的影响。详细讨论了各项目判别指标的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial Issue Cover On the Cover: Gendered Trajectories of Digital Literacy Development: Insights from a Longitudinal Cohort Study Digital Module 36: Applying Intersectionality Theory to Educational Measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1