Konstantin N. Leontiev and Lev N. Tolstoy: A “Failed Creative Dialogue”

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2021.2010421
E. Besschetnova
{"title":"Konstantin N. Leontiev and Lev N. Tolstoy: A “Failed Creative Dialogue”","authors":"E. Besschetnova","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.2010421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines Konstantin N. Leontiev’s critique of the religious preaching of Lev N. Tolstoy. We analyze the philosopher’s main articles devoted to the great writer, noting that, despite Leontiev’s admiration for Tolstoy as the author of brilliant novels, he emphasized that Tolstoy had a much greater gift for writing than for personal religiosity. Tolstoy could not perceive Christianity at a deeper level, limiting himself to a superficial view. We show that Leontiev believed Tolstoy’s ideas fully corresponded to the “Zeitgeist,” in which the philosopher had seen the first signs of cultural decay and destruction. Leontiev considered a universal, reductionist confusion to be the cause of the beginning of the end and the destruction of the world, and he thought that the ultimate fruits of humanism—democracy and universal equality—bring with them a destructive, ruinously anti-Christian force.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"405 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2010421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines Konstantin N. Leontiev’s critique of the religious preaching of Lev N. Tolstoy. We analyze the philosopher’s main articles devoted to the great writer, noting that, despite Leontiev’s admiration for Tolstoy as the author of brilliant novels, he emphasized that Tolstoy had a much greater gift for writing than for personal religiosity. Tolstoy could not perceive Christianity at a deeper level, limiting himself to a superficial view. We show that Leontiev believed Tolstoy’s ideas fully corresponded to the “Zeitgeist,” in which the philosopher had seen the first signs of cultural decay and destruction. Leontiev considered a universal, reductionist confusion to be the cause of the beginning of the end and the destruction of the world, and he thought that the ultimate fruits of humanism—democracy and universal equality—bring with them a destructive, ruinously anti-Christian force.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康斯坦丁·列昂蒂耶夫与列夫·托尔斯泰:一场“失败的创造性对话”
本文考察了康斯坦丁·列昂捷耶夫对列夫·托尔斯泰宗教说教的批判。我们分析了这位哲学家关于这位伟大作家的主要文章,注意到,尽管列昂捷夫钦佩托尔斯泰是一位杰出小说的作者,但他强调托尔斯泰在写作方面的天赋要比个人的宗教信仰大得多。托尔斯泰无法在更深的层面上理解基督教,他把自己局限在一个肤浅的观点上。我们表明,列昂捷夫相信托尔斯泰的思想完全符合“时代精神”,在这个时代,这位哲学家已经看到了文化衰败和毁灭的最初迹象。列昂捷夫认为一种普遍的、简化主义的困惑是世界终结和毁灭的开始,他认为人文主义的最终成果——民主和普遍平等——带来了一种破坏性的、毁灭性的反基督教力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1