A Novel Risk Score (P-score) Based on a Three-Gene Signature, for Estimating the Risk of Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality

IF 2 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S358169
F. Söderdahl, Lidi Xu, J. Bring, M. Häggman
{"title":"A Novel Risk Score (P-score) Based on a Three-Gene Signature, for Estimating the Risk of Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality","authors":"F. Söderdahl, Lidi Xu, J. Bring, M. Häggman","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S358169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To develop and validate a risk score (P-score) algorithm which includes previously described three-gene signature and clinicopathological parameters to predict the risk of death from prostate cancer (PCa) in a retrospective cohort. Patients and Methods A total of 591 PCa patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 in Stockholm, Sweden, with a median clinical follow-up time of 7.6 years (1–11 years) were included in this study. Expression of a three-gene signature (IGFBP3, F3, VGLL3) was measured in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material from diagnostic core needle biopsies (CNB) of these patients. A point-based scoring system based on a Fine-Gray competing risk model was used to establish the P-score based on the three-gene signature combined with PSA value, Gleason score and tumor stage at diagnosis. The endpoint was PCa-specific mortality, while other causes of death were treated as a competing risk. Out of the 591 patients, 315 patients (estimation cohort) were selected to develop the P-score. The P-score was subsequently validated in an independent validation cohort of 276 patients. Results The P-score was established ranging from the integers 0 to 15. Each one-unit increase was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.27–1.51, p < 0.001). The P-score was validated and performed better in predicting PCa-specific mortality than both D’Amico (0.76 vs 0.70) and NCCN (0.76 vs 0.71) by using the concordance index for competing risk. Similar improvement patterns are shown by time-dependent area under the curve. As demonstrated by cumulative incidence function, both P-score and gene signature stratified PCa patients into significantly different risk groups. Conclusion We developed the P-score, a risk stratification system for newly diagnosed PCa patients by integrating a three-gene signature measured in CNB tissue. The P-score could provide valuable decision support to distinguish PCa patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes and hence improve treatment decisions.","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":"14 1","pages":"203 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S358169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose To develop and validate a risk score (P-score) algorithm which includes previously described three-gene signature and clinicopathological parameters to predict the risk of death from prostate cancer (PCa) in a retrospective cohort. Patients and Methods A total of 591 PCa patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 in Stockholm, Sweden, with a median clinical follow-up time of 7.6 years (1–11 years) were included in this study. Expression of a three-gene signature (IGFBP3, F3, VGLL3) was measured in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material from diagnostic core needle biopsies (CNB) of these patients. A point-based scoring system based on a Fine-Gray competing risk model was used to establish the P-score based on the three-gene signature combined with PSA value, Gleason score and tumor stage at diagnosis. The endpoint was PCa-specific mortality, while other causes of death were treated as a competing risk. Out of the 591 patients, 315 patients (estimation cohort) were selected to develop the P-score. The P-score was subsequently validated in an independent validation cohort of 276 patients. Results The P-score was established ranging from the integers 0 to 15. Each one-unit increase was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.27–1.51, p < 0.001). The P-score was validated and performed better in predicting PCa-specific mortality than both D’Amico (0.76 vs 0.70) and NCCN (0.76 vs 0.71) by using the concordance index for competing risk. Similar improvement patterns are shown by time-dependent area under the curve. As demonstrated by cumulative incidence function, both P-score and gene signature stratified PCa patients into significantly different risk groups. Conclusion We developed the P-score, a risk stratification system for newly diagnosed PCa patients by integrating a three-gene signature measured in CNB tissue. The P-score could provide valuable decision support to distinguish PCa patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes and hence improve treatment decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的基于三基因特征的风险评分(P评分),用于估计前列腺癌特异性死亡率的风险
目的:在回顾性队列中,开发并验证一种风险评分(P-score)算法,该算法包括先前描述的三基因特征和临床病理参数,以预测前列腺癌(PCa)的死亡风险。患者和方法本研究共纳入2003 - 2008年在瑞典斯德哥尔摩诊断的591例PCa患者,临床随访时间中位数为7.6年(1-11年)。在这些患者的诊断芯针活检(CNB)中检测福尔马林固定石蜡包埋材料中三个基因特征(IGFBP3, F3, VGLL3)的表达。采用基于Fine-Gray竞争风险模型的积分评分系统,结合PSA值、Gleason评分和诊断时肿瘤分期,建立基于三基因特征的p评分。终点是前列腺癌特异性死亡率,而其他死亡原因被视为竞争风险。在591例患者中,选择315例患者(估计队列)进行p评分。随后在276例患者的独立验证队列中验证了p评分。结果建立的p评分范围为0 ~ 15。每增加一个单位,风险比为1.39(95%可信区间:1.27-1.51,p < 0.001)。通过竞争风险的一致性指数,p -评分在预测前列腺癌特异性死亡率方面优于D 'Amico (0.76 vs 0.70)和NCCN (0.76 vs 0.71)。曲线下随时间变化的面积显示了类似的改进模式。累积发生率函数表明,P-score和基因标记将PCa患者分层为明显不同的风险组。我们通过整合CNB组织中测量的三个基因标记,开发了新诊断的PCa患者的风险分层系统P-score。p -评分可以提供有价值的决策支持,以区分前列腺癌患者的有利和不利的结果,从而改善治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Mature Teratoma Combined with Bladder Stones: A Case Report and Literature Review. The Role of Immunohistochemistry for AMACR/p504s and p63 in Distinguishing Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Tissue Samples in Botswana. Knowledge of Male Infertility and Acceptance of Medical Assistance Reproductive Technology Among Fertile and Infertile Senegalese Men. Transperineal Drainage of Seminal Vesicle Abscess Under Local Anaesthetic: A Case Report. The Importance of Diagnostics in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in the United Kingdom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1