The Good Behaviour Game: Maintaining students' physical distancing in physical education classes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Health Education Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1177/00178969221147609
Olfa Tounsi, Abdessalem Koubaa, Omar Trabelsi, Liwa Masmoudi, Bessem Mkaouer, Khaled Trabelsi, Haitham Jahrami, Cain Ct Clark, Mourad Bahloul
{"title":"The Good Behaviour Game: Maintaining students' physical distancing in physical education classes during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Olfa Tounsi, Abdessalem Koubaa, Omar Trabelsi, Liwa Masmoudi, Bessem Mkaouer, Khaled Trabelsi, Haitham Jahrami, Cain Ct Clark, Mourad Bahloul","doi":"10.1177/00178969221147609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintaining physical distancing is one of the most important steps to enforce in educational institutions to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19. However, close proximity and physical contact between students are often considered 'normal' during physical education (PE) classes, making it challenging for PE teachers to ensure physical distancing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the implementation of the Good Behaviour Game (GBG) in maintaining physical distancing in PE settings in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a quasi-experimental design, two groups were separately designated as an experimental group (20 classes involving 220 students) and a control group (20 classes involving 231 students). They were all enrolled in the eighth grade of the Tunisian education system. In the experimental group, the PE teacher managed physical distancing by administering the GBG. Physical distancing was evaluated by direct observation of videos of filmed PE sessions using a code grid. It was measured twice for the two groups using Kinovea software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data analyses showed that the level of maintaining physical distancing increased after the GBG intervention in the experimental group (<i>p</i> < .001). Furthermore, greater percent changes between pre- and post-intervention were identified in the experimental group compared to the control group (120% vs 1%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GBG was effective in ensuring students' physical distancing when implemented in PE settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47346,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"82 1","pages":"200-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969221147609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maintaining physical distancing is one of the most important steps to enforce in educational institutions to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19. However, close proximity and physical contact between students are often considered 'normal' during physical education (PE) classes, making it challenging for PE teachers to ensure physical distancing.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the implementation of the Good Behaviour Game (GBG) in maintaining physical distancing in PE settings in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method: In a quasi-experimental design, two groups were separately designated as an experimental group (20 classes involving 220 students) and a control group (20 classes involving 231 students). They were all enrolled in the eighth grade of the Tunisian education system. In the experimental group, the PE teacher managed physical distancing by administering the GBG. Physical distancing was evaluated by direct observation of videos of filmed PE sessions using a code grid. It was measured twice for the two groups using Kinovea software.

Results: Quantitative data analyses showed that the level of maintaining physical distancing increased after the GBG intervention in the experimental group (p < .001). Furthermore, greater percent changes between pre- and post-intervention were identified in the experimental group compared to the control group (120% vs 1%, respectively).

Conclusion: The GBG was effective in ensuring students' physical distancing when implemented in PE settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
良好行为游戏:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,在体育课上保持学生的身体距离
背景:保持身体距离是教育机构为降低新冠肺炎传播风险而采取的最重要措施之一。然而,在体育课上,学生之间的亲密接触和身体接触通常被认为是“正常的”,这使得体育老师很难确保身体距离。目的:本研究旨在评估新冠肺炎大流行期间实施良好行为游戏(GBG)在体育环境中保持身体距离的效果。方法:采用准实验设计,将两组学生分别设为实验组(20个班,220名学生)和对照组(20班,231名学生)。他们都是突尼斯教育系统八年级的学生。在实验组中,体育老师通过使用GBG来管理物理距离。物理距离是通过使用代码网格直接观察体育课的视频来评估的。使用Kinovea软件对两组患者进行了两次测量。结果:定量数据分析显示,实验组在GBG干预后保持物理距离的水平增加(p < .001)。此外,与对照组相比,实验组在干预前和干预后的百分比变化更大(分别为120%和1%)。结论:GBG在体育教学中能有效地保证学生的身体距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Health Education Journal is a leading peer reviewed journal established in 1943. It carries original papers on health promotion and education research, policy development and good practice.
期刊最新文献
Students', parents' and teachers' perspectives on comprehensive school-based sleep promotion. The effect of an educational intervention on healthy lifestyle knowledge and behaviour among middle-aged women Men’s experiences of HeadsUpGuys: A strength-based case study Listening ‘with’ children ‘to’ the more-than-human world: A diffractive analysis of the child and the challenge of sustainability Anatomically correct models for visually impaired learners: Teachers’ perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1