Terrestrial water storage changes over 25 global river basins extracted by local mean decomposition from GRACE Monthly Gravity Field solutions

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.13168/agg.2023.0006
Changming Huan
{"title":"Terrestrial water storage changes over 25 global river basins extracted by local mean decomposition from GRACE Monthly Gravity Field solutions","authors":"Changming Huan","doi":"10.13168/agg.2023.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strong striping and high-frequency noise existed in Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) solutions drowned the real geophysical signals, which need other signal extraction methods. Considering the advantages of local mean decomposition (LMD) in extracting geophysical signals from noisy time series, we adopt it to filter the noise and estimate the terrestrial water storage (TWS) changes over 25 global main river basins from the time series of 14-year (2002.04~2016.08) Release 06 (RL06) monthly gravity field models provided by Center for Space Research (CSR), together with the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) as a comparison. To evaluate the efficiency of eliminating noise by LMD and EMD, the ratios of the latitude weighted RMS over the land and ocean signals are adopted. The results show that all RMS ratios of land relative to ocean signals derived by LMD are higher than EMD with the mean values 3.4458 and 3.3302, respectively. Moreover, relative to the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) Noah model, the extracted TWS changes by LMD approach have smaller root mean squared errors than EMD over 25 global river basins. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that LMD approach outperforms EMD in extracting TWS changes and filtering out the strong noise existed in GRACE monthly gravity field solutions.","PeriodicalId":50899,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13168/agg.2023.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The strong striping and high-frequency noise existed in Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) solutions drowned the real geophysical signals, which need other signal extraction methods. Considering the advantages of local mean decomposition (LMD) in extracting geophysical signals from noisy time series, we adopt it to filter the noise and estimate the terrestrial water storage (TWS) changes over 25 global main river basins from the time series of 14-year (2002.04~2016.08) Release 06 (RL06) monthly gravity field models provided by Center for Space Research (CSR), together with the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) as a comparison. To evaluate the efficiency of eliminating noise by LMD and EMD, the ratios of the latitude weighted RMS over the land and ocean signals are adopted. The results show that all RMS ratios of land relative to ocean signals derived by LMD are higher than EMD with the mean values 3.4458 and 3.3302, respectively. Moreover, relative to the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) Noah model, the extracted TWS changes by LMD approach have smaller root mean squared errors than EMD over 25 global river basins. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that LMD approach outperforms EMD in extracting TWS changes and filtering out the strong noise existed in GRACE monthly gravity field solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GRACE月度重力场解的局部平均分解提取的全球25个流域的地表水储量变化
重力恢复与气候实验(GRACE)解决方案中存在的强条纹和高频噪声淹没了真实的地球物理信号,需要其他信号提取方法。考虑到局部平均分解(LMD)在从有噪声的时间序列中提取地球物理信号方面的优势,我们采用它来过滤噪声,并从空间研究中心(CSR)提供的14年(2002.04~2016.08)Release 06(RL06)月度重力场模型中估计25个全球主要流域的陆地蓄水量变化,以及作为比较的经验模式分解(EMD)。为了评估LMD和EMD消除噪声的效率,采用了陆地和海洋信号的纬度加权RMS的比值。结果表明,LMD得到的陆地与海洋信号的均方根比均高于EMD,平均值分别为3.4458和3.3302。此外,相对于全球陆地数据同化系统(GLDAS)Noah模型,在全球25个流域中,通过LMD方法提取的TWS变化的均方根误差小于EMD。因此,可以合理地得出结论,LMD方法在提取TWS变化和滤除GRACE月重力场解中存在的强噪声方面优于EMD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia
Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Acta geodynamica et geomaterialia (AGG) has been published by the Institute of Rock Structures and Mechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences since 2004, formerly known as Acta Montana published from the beginning of sixties till 2003. Approximately 40 articles per year in four issues are published, covering observations related to central Europe and new theoretical developments and interpretations in these disciplines. It is possible to publish occasionally research articles from other regions of the world, only if they present substantial advance in methodological or theoretical development with worldwide impact. The Board of Editors is international in representation.
期刊最新文献
Improvement of expansive soil by microwave irradiation iquid limit determination of medium to high plasticity Algerian soils using fall-cone vs Casagrande percussion cup methods Differences in strength, seepage, and acoustic emission characteristics of raw coal and briquette coal samples: A triaxial compression experiment investigation Identifying the geological structure of the Garyan area in northwest Libya using eigen-6c4 satellite gravity data Comparative analysis of PCS and ICA on trend estimation of sea-level change from tide gauge observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1