In Defence of Danish Writers. The Daily Workings of the Press Bureau; or the Struggle for Sovereignty, 1940–1943

IF 0.7 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI:10.1080/03468755.2022.2084156
T. Andersen
{"title":"In Defence of Danish Writers. The Daily Workings of the Press Bureau; or the Struggle for Sovereignty, 1940–1943","authors":"T. Andersen","doi":"10.1080/03468755.2022.2084156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates the way in which cultural censorship was practiced in Nazi-occupied Denmark, focusing on the Danish Press Bureau’s censorship of books in the period 1940–1943. From April 1940 to August 1943, the explicit German acceptance of Denmark as an independent state constituted a certain degree of internal sovereignty; often referred to as the illusion of sovereignty in Danish historiography. On the basis of new empirical studies and records of the Press Bureau, and with particular emphasis on two significant cases, this article argues that this illusion of sovereignty had an impact on the Danish administration of censorship, and it demonstrates the importance within the Press Bureau of maintaining the outward show of sovereignty. The article reveals that the formal political setting of the occupation had real administrative implications in negotiating with the German occupier in the sense that Danish authorities within the Press Bureau to some extent acted autonomously and even challenged direct German orders in relation to censorship. In doing so, the Press Bureau succeeded in defending Danish writers against further German pressures in some cases, which adds new insights regarding the peculiar form of political sovereignty that was constituted in Denmark.","PeriodicalId":45280,"journal":{"name":"SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY","volume":"48 1","pages":"206 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2022.2084156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates the way in which cultural censorship was practiced in Nazi-occupied Denmark, focusing on the Danish Press Bureau’s censorship of books in the period 1940–1943. From April 1940 to August 1943, the explicit German acceptance of Denmark as an independent state constituted a certain degree of internal sovereignty; often referred to as the illusion of sovereignty in Danish historiography. On the basis of new empirical studies and records of the Press Bureau, and with particular emphasis on two significant cases, this article argues that this illusion of sovereignty had an impact on the Danish administration of censorship, and it demonstrates the importance within the Press Bureau of maintaining the outward show of sovereignty. The article reveals that the formal political setting of the occupation had real administrative implications in negotiating with the German occupier in the sense that Danish authorities within the Press Bureau to some extent acted autonomously and even challenged direct German orders in relation to censorship. In doing so, the Press Bureau succeeded in defending Danish writers against further German pressures in some cases, which adds new insights regarding the peculiar form of political sovereignty that was constituted in Denmark.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为丹麦作家辩护。新闻局的日常工作;或1940年至1943年的主权斗争
本文以1940-1943年期间丹麦新闻局对图书的审查为研究对象,考察了纳粹占领时期丹麦文化审查制度的实施方式。从1940年4月到1943年8月,德国明确承认丹麦是一个独立的国家,这构成了一定程度的内部主权;在丹麦史学中通常被称为主权幻觉。在新的实证研究和新闻局记录的基础上,并特别强调两个重要的案例,本文认为,这种主权幻觉对丹麦的审查管理产生了影响,并证明了在新闻局内部保持主权的外在表现的重要性。文章揭示,占领的正式政治背景在与德国占领者谈判时具有真正的行政影响,因为新闻局内的丹麦当局在某种程度上自主行事,甚至在审查方面挑战德国的直接命令。在这样做的过程中,新闻局在某些情况下成功地保护了丹麦作家免受德国的进一步压力,这使人们对丹麦形成的政治主权的特殊形式有了新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of History presents articles on Scandinavian history and review essays surveying themes in recent Scandinavian historical research. It concentrates on perspectives of national historical particularities and important long-term and short-term developments. The editorial policy gives particular priority to Scandinavian topics and to efforts of placing Scandinavian developments into a larger context. Studies explicitly comparing Scandinavian processes and phenomena to those in other parts of the world are therefore regarded as particularly important. In addition to publishing articles and review essays, the journal includes short book reviews. Review essay proposals and polemical communications are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Scandinavia and the 1968 International Year for Human Rights Going Beyond the Tropes of ‘Friendship’ and ‘Modernization’: Internal Colonialism in Siam and Scandinavia in the Age of Empire The 1975 Icelandic ‘Women’s day off’ in Nordic print media Cold War conduct: knowledge transfer, psychological defence, and media preparedness in Denmark between Sweden, Norway, and NATO, 1954–1967 Fever, sun, and blood: sermons, amulets, and incantations as sources for magical practices in Medieval Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1