The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between Perceived Parenting Styles and Anger Management

Behzad Azarnioshan, H. Naderi, A. Shojaee, Askar Asghariganji
{"title":"The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between Perceived Parenting Styles and Anger Management","authors":"Behzad Azarnioshan, H. Naderi, A. Shojaee, Askar Asghariganji","doi":"10.5812/INTJSH.95048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study of anger is important from many aspects, one of which is the anger management. Objectives: The current study aimed at examining the mediating role of resilience in the relationship between perceived parenting styles and anger management in high school students. Methods: Using randomized cluster sampling, 395 high school students (females and males) from Babolsar city, Iran enrolled in the school for the academic year of 2017 - 2018 were selected as the study participants. The participants’ ages ranged 12 to 16 years (mean = 13.93, SD = 0.81). The perceived parenting style of the participants was determined, using resilience and anger management scales. Data were analyzed by AMOS version 22. In order to evaluate the proposed model of the study, path analysis was performed. Results: The results indicated that the authoritative parenting style was a positive predictor of anger management (P = 0.006,β= 0.19) and resilience (P = 0.012,β= 0.21). The results also revealed that the authoritarian parenting style was a negative predictor of anger management (P = 0.008,β= -.25) and resilience (P = 0.005,β= - 0.31). Resilience was a positive predictor of anger management (P = 0.011,β= 0.33) and played a mediator role between authoritative and authoritarian parenting styles and anger management. The results showed that the acceptable percentage of anger management variance was explained by the model. Conclusions: Given the results, increase of authoritative parenting style and decrease of authoritarian parenting style are accompanied by strengthened anger management skill in high school students. Therefore, holding workshops for parents can help them to strengthen the management of anger in their children.","PeriodicalId":33610,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of School Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/INTJSH.95048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The study of anger is important from many aspects, one of which is the anger management. Objectives: The current study aimed at examining the mediating role of resilience in the relationship between perceived parenting styles and anger management in high school students. Methods: Using randomized cluster sampling, 395 high school students (females and males) from Babolsar city, Iran enrolled in the school for the academic year of 2017 - 2018 were selected as the study participants. The participants’ ages ranged 12 to 16 years (mean = 13.93, SD = 0.81). The perceived parenting style of the participants was determined, using resilience and anger management scales. Data were analyzed by AMOS version 22. In order to evaluate the proposed model of the study, path analysis was performed. Results: The results indicated that the authoritative parenting style was a positive predictor of anger management (P = 0.006,β= 0.19) and resilience (P = 0.012,β= 0.21). The results also revealed that the authoritarian parenting style was a negative predictor of anger management (P = 0.008,β= -.25) and resilience (P = 0.005,β= - 0.31). Resilience was a positive predictor of anger management (P = 0.011,β= 0.33) and played a mediator role between authoritative and authoritarian parenting styles and anger management. The results showed that the acceptable percentage of anger management variance was explained by the model. Conclusions: Given the results, increase of authoritative parenting style and decrease of authoritarian parenting style are accompanied by strengthened anger management skill in high school students. Therefore, holding workshops for parents can help them to strengthen the management of anger in their children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理弹性在感知父母教养方式与愤怒管理关系中的中介作用
背景:愤怒的研究从很多方面都很重要,其中一个方面就是愤怒管理。目的:本研究旨在探讨韧性在高中生感知父母教养方式与愤怒管理之间的中介作用。方法:采用随机整群抽样的方法,选取2017 - 2018学年伊朗巴保勒萨尔市在校高中生395名(男女)作为研究对象。参与者年龄在12 - 16岁之间(平均= 13.93,SD = 0.81)。使用弹性和愤怒管理量表来确定参与者感知到的养育方式。数据采用AMOS version 22进行分析。为了评估所提出的研究模型,进行了通径分析。结果:权威型教养方式对孩子的愤怒管理(P = 0.006,β= 0.19)和心理韧性(P = 0.012,β= 0.21)有正向预测作用。结果还显示,专制父母方式对愤怒管理(P = 0.008,β= - 0.25)和韧性(P = 0.005,β= - 0.31)具有负向预测作用。韧性是愤怒管理的正向预测因子(P = 0.011,β= 0.33),并在权威型和权威型父母教养方式与愤怒管理之间起中介作用。结果表明,该模型解释了愤怒管理方差的可接受百分比。结论:从结果来看,权威型父母教养方式的增加和权威型父母教养方式的减少伴随着高中生愤怒管理技能的增强。因此,为家长举办工作坊可以帮助他们加强对孩子愤怒情绪的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Physical Education on Motivation, Engagement, Sport Satisfaction, and Health-Related Fitness of High-School Students Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Mental Health of High-School Students during COVID-19 Pandemic Mediating Role of Depression Associated with Social Competence, Cognitive Failures and Academic Performance in Students with Specific Learning Disability Effects of an Intervention in Online Physical Education Classes on Motivation, Intention, and Physical Activity of Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic The Role of Cognitive Emotion Regulation in Drug-Seeking Behaviors in Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1