Drug Seller Provision Practices and Knowledge of Misoprostol in Bangladesh.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2019-10-21 DOI:10.1363/45e7819
Kate Reiss, K. Keenan, K. Church, Sally Dijkerman, Shahida A Mitu, Sadid Nuremowla, T. Ngo
{"title":"Drug Seller Provision Practices and Knowledge of Misoprostol in Bangladesh.","authors":"Kate Reiss, K. Keenan, K. Church, Sally Dijkerman, Shahida A Mitu, Sadid Nuremowla, T. Ngo","doi":"10.1363/45e7819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nIn Bangladesh, prior to the availability of the approved combination regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol for menstrual regulation (MR), drug seller provision of misoprostol-only regimens for MR without a prescription was widespread but service quality was poor. Examining provider practices relating to misoprostol-only provision in Bangladesh may increase understanding of misoprostol use and provision in other low-resource, legally restrictive settings.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn 2013-2014, a countrywide cross-sectional knowledge, attitudes and practice survey was conducted among 777 randomly selected drug sellers; data were analyzed descriptively. Logistic regression was used to test the associations between exposure to three interventions designed to improve drug seller practice (nongovernmental organization [NGO]-led training, a call center and in-shop training from pharmaceutical company representatives) and correct knowledge of the misoprostol-only MR regimen.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAlmost all (97%) of the drug sellers reported providing medications intended for MR; misoprostol-only was more commonly sold than the combination regimen (96% vs. 26%). Nine percent had received NGO-led training, 62% had received in-shop training from a pharmaceutical company representative and 27% had used the call center. Overall, 19% of drug sellers knew the correct misoprostol-only MR regimen, and 74% wanted more information about this regimen. Correct regimen knowledge was positively associated with receipt of NGO training and call center utilization (odds ratios, 2.0 and 1.9, respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nNGO-led training and call centers should be considered in other settings in which misoprostol alone is provided off-label for pregnancy termination.","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/45e7819","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

CONTEXT In Bangladesh, prior to the availability of the approved combination regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol for menstrual regulation (MR), drug seller provision of misoprostol-only regimens for MR without a prescription was widespread but service quality was poor. Examining provider practices relating to misoprostol-only provision in Bangladesh may increase understanding of misoprostol use and provision in other low-resource, legally restrictive settings. METHODS In 2013-2014, a countrywide cross-sectional knowledge, attitudes and practice survey was conducted among 777 randomly selected drug sellers; data were analyzed descriptively. Logistic regression was used to test the associations between exposure to three interventions designed to improve drug seller practice (nongovernmental organization [NGO]-led training, a call center and in-shop training from pharmaceutical company representatives) and correct knowledge of the misoprostol-only MR regimen. RESULTS Almost all (97%) of the drug sellers reported providing medications intended for MR; misoprostol-only was more commonly sold than the combination regimen (96% vs. 26%). Nine percent had received NGO-led training, 62% had received in-shop training from a pharmaceutical company representative and 27% had used the call center. Overall, 19% of drug sellers knew the correct misoprostol-only MR regimen, and 74% wanted more information about this regimen. Correct regimen knowledge was positively associated with receipt of NGO training and call center utilization (odds ratios, 2.0 and 1.9, respectively). CONCLUSIONS NGO-led training and call centers should be considered in other settings in which misoprostol alone is provided off-label for pregnancy termination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药品销售商在孟加拉国提供米索前列醇的做法和知识。
在孟加拉国,在批准米非司酮和米索前列醇用于月经调节(MR)的联合方案之前,药品销售商在没有处方的情况下为MR提供仅米索前列醇的方案的情况很普遍,但服务质量很差。在孟加拉国,检查提供者仅提供米索前列醇的做法可能会加深对米索前列在其他资源匮乏、法律限制性环境中的使用和提供的了解。方法2013-2014年,在全国范围内对777名随机选择的药品销售商进行了横断面知识、态度和实践调查;对数据进行描述性分析。Logistic回归用于测试暴露于三种干预措施(非政府组织领导的培训、呼叫中心和制药公司代表的店内培训)与正确了解仅使用米索前列醇的MR方案之间的相关性。结果几乎所有(97%)的药品销售商都报告提供了用于MR的药物;仅米索前列醇比联合用药方案更常见(96%对26%)。9%的人接受过非政府组织领导的培训,62%的人接受了制药公司代表的店内培训,27%的人使用过呼叫中心。总体而言,19%的药品销售商知道正确的仅使用米索前列醇的MR方案,74%的人想要更多关于该方案的信息。正确的养生知识与接受非政府组织培训和呼叫中心利用率呈正相关(比值比分别为2.0和1.9)。结论在其他情况下,应考虑由政府主导的培训和呼叫中心,在这些情况下,米索前列醇单独用于终止妊娠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's Perspectives on Contraceptive-Induced Amenorrhea in Burkina Faso and Uganda. Provider and Women Characteristics as Risk Factors for Postpartum Copper IUD Expulsion and Discontinuation in Nepal. Assessing Readiness to Provide Comprehensive Abortion Care in the Democratic Republic of the Congo After Passage of the Maputo Protocol. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan. Chilean Medical and Midwifery Faculty's Views on Conscientious Objection for Abortion Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1