Feasibility and clinical utility of the critical pain observation tool among mechanically ventilated patients

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Nursing Practice Today Pub Date : 2022-03-13 DOI:10.18502/npt.v9i2.8894
Khalid Nabeel Alshlool, Maysoon S Abdalrahim, Wejdan Othman Younis
{"title":"Feasibility and clinical utility of the critical pain observation tool among mechanically ventilated patients","authors":"Khalid Nabeel Alshlool, Maysoon S Abdalrahim, Wejdan Othman Younis","doi":"10.18502/npt.v9i2.8894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: The Critical Pain Observational Tool (CPOT) is one of the most valid and reliable pain assessment tools to assess pain in mechanically ventilated patients. This study aimed to investigate the Critical Care Pain Observational tool feasibility and clinical utility from the nurses’ perspective at a teaching hospital in Jordan. \nMethods & Materials: Descriptive design was used to collect data from 74 nurses working in five critical care units in a teaching hospital in Jordan. The study was conducted in August 2019. The Feasibility and Clinical Utility of Critical Pain Observation Tool collected the data. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22. \nResults: The mean feasibility score was 69.0/100 (SD=8.56) with a range of 18-33/36 (50.0-91.0/100), indicating a moderate category of feasibility. Also, the mean of the clinical utility scores was 68.53/100 (SD=9.78) with a range of 11-26/28 (39.29-92.8/100), indicating moderate clinical utility. \nConclusion: Nurses reported moderate feasibility and clinical utility of the CPOT; thus, it is important to promote education and training of nurses to ensure maximum utilization of the tool.","PeriodicalId":36883,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Practice Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Practice Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v9i2.8894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background & Aim: The Critical Pain Observational Tool (CPOT) is one of the most valid and reliable pain assessment tools to assess pain in mechanically ventilated patients. This study aimed to investigate the Critical Care Pain Observational tool feasibility and clinical utility from the nurses’ perspective at a teaching hospital in Jordan. Methods & Materials: Descriptive design was used to collect data from 74 nurses working in five critical care units in a teaching hospital in Jordan. The study was conducted in August 2019. The Feasibility and Clinical Utility of Critical Pain Observation Tool collected the data. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22. Results: The mean feasibility score was 69.0/100 (SD=8.56) with a range of 18-33/36 (50.0-91.0/100), indicating a moderate category of feasibility. Also, the mean of the clinical utility scores was 68.53/100 (SD=9.78) with a range of 11-26/28 (39.29-92.8/100), indicating moderate clinical utility. Conclusion: Nurses reported moderate feasibility and clinical utility of the CPOT; thus, it is important to promote education and training of nurses to ensure maximum utilization of the tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械通气患者临界疼痛观察工具的可行性及临床应用
背景与目的:危重疼痛观察工具(CPOT)是评估机械通气患者疼痛的最有效、最可靠的疼痛评估工具之一。本研究旨在从约旦一家教学医院护士的角度调查重症监护疼痛观察工具的可行性和临床实用性。方法与材料:采用描述性设计收集约旦一家教学医院五个重症监护室74名护士的数据。该研究于2019年8月进行。《危重疼痛观察工具的可行性和临床应用》收集了相关数据。使用SPSS软件版本22对数据进行分析。结果:平均可行性得分为69.0/100(SD=8.56),范围为18-33/36(50.0-91.0/100),表明可行性属于中等类别。此外,临床效用得分的平均值为68.53/100(SD=9.78),范围为11-26/28(39.29-92.8/100),表明临床效用中等。结论:护士报告CPOT的适度可行性和临床实用性;因此,加强对护士的教育和培训,以确保该工具的最大限度利用是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Practice Today
Nursing Practice Today Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional capacity and its associated factors in older adults in the rural area in Brazil Predictors of prone position use in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study Fear of COVID-19, stress, anxiety, depression, and insomnia among undergraduate nursing students in Oman The level of teamwork and associated factors in the selected hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A cross-sectional study A thematic analysis of professionalism from the perspective of nurse managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1