State Aid as a Risk in the Policy of Competitive Advantages in the European Union

Q3 Social Sciences Studia Iuridica Lublinensia Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.35-55
Ildikó Bartha, T. Horváth
{"title":"State Aid as a Risk in the Policy of Competitive Advantages in the European Union","authors":"Ildikó Bartha, T. Horváth","doi":"10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.35-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compatibility of economic advantages with the internal market refers to the economic impact of state aid that is permitted by EU competition rules. In general, this approach is based on the acceptance of derogations from basic obligations in a market economy, that may also be granted by the European Union to its Member States. Due advantages seem compatible with EU law per se, however, such compatibility also depends on the discretion of the competent administrative and judicial bodies. According to the analytical and empirical legal policy investigation presented in this article, the activity of the Court of Justice of the European Union is increasing in order to allow exceptions from general rules and extend the scope of compatibility in this field. This process may lead to enhance derogations from market-based commitments in Member States, typically in certain Central and Eastern European countries, which tend to emphasize the primacy of national regulation and are keen to exploit the potential of such broader regulatory autonomy. The aim of the study is to identify the origin and nature of this risk in order to support efforts that may diminish harmful effects in an EU-wide context. The empirical evidence of the paper derives from a systematically selected set of case law as a context by which the examined policy orientation is mirrored.","PeriodicalId":36157,"journal":{"name":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.35-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compatibility of economic advantages with the internal market refers to the economic impact of state aid that is permitted by EU competition rules. In general, this approach is based on the acceptance of derogations from basic obligations in a market economy, that may also be granted by the European Union to its Member States. Due advantages seem compatible with EU law per se, however, such compatibility also depends on the discretion of the competent administrative and judicial bodies. According to the analytical and empirical legal policy investigation presented in this article, the activity of the Court of Justice of the European Union is increasing in order to allow exceptions from general rules and extend the scope of compatibility in this field. This process may lead to enhance derogations from market-based commitments in Member States, typically in certain Central and Eastern European countries, which tend to emphasize the primacy of national regulation and are keen to exploit the potential of such broader regulatory autonomy. The aim of the study is to identify the origin and nature of this risk in order to support efforts that may diminish harmful effects in an EU-wide context. The empirical evidence of the paper derives from a systematically selected set of case law as a context by which the examined policy orientation is mirrored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟竞争优势政策中的国家援助风险
经济优势与内部市场的兼容性是指欧盟竞争规则所允许的国家援助的经济影响。总的来说,这种办法的基础是接受市场经济中基本义务的减损,欧洲联盟也可能给予其成员国减损。应有的利益似乎与欧盟法律本身兼容,然而,这种兼容性也取决于主管行政和司法机构的自由裁量权。根据本文提出的分析性和经验性法律政策调查,欧洲联盟法院的活动正在增加,以便允许一般规则的例外情况,并扩大这一领域的兼容范围。这一进程可能导致会员国,特别是某些中欧和东欧国家,进一步背离以市场为基础的承诺,这些国家往往强调国家管制的首要地位,并热衷于利用这种更广泛的管制自治的潜力。这项研究的目的是确定这种风险的来源和性质,以支持在整个欧盟范围内减少有害影响的努力。本文的经验证据来源于一套系统选择的判例法作为背景,通过这些背景可以反映所审查的政策取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
The Legal Position of the National Bank of Poland as a Guardian of the Value of Money in the Light of Normative Determinants of Monetary Order The Transparency of Constitutional Reasoning: A Text Mining Analysis of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Jurisprudence Convergence of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Armed Conflicts Land Valuation Methods in Land Consolidation Proceedings vs. Implementation of the Purpose of Land Consolidation as Specified in the Land Consolidation and Exchange Act of 1982 in Rural Poland The Medievalist Approach to the Idea of Peace Based on the Example of the Doctrine of Marsilius of Padua
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1