Courts as Data Guardians for the Public Good

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW University of Toronto Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-16 DOI:10.3138/utlj-2023-0005
Emily S. Taylor Poppe
{"title":"Courts as Data Guardians for the Public Good","authors":"Emily S. Taylor Poppe","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an increasingly digital world, where data-driven decision making and technology-enhanced workflows are the norm, civil courts lag behind. Despite the rise in electronic filing, many civil court records remain inaccessible and unused by court administrators and other government actors. Meanwhile, for-profit companies increasingly compile court records into massive datasets that facilitate sophisticated legal analytics. This discrepancy between public and private approaches results in unfulfilled potential for court records to inform court operations, procedural rule making, and substantive policy. This article argues for a future in which courts address these failures and take on the role of data guardians for the public good.","PeriodicalId":46289,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2023-0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an increasingly digital world, where data-driven decision making and technology-enhanced workflows are the norm, civil courts lag behind. Despite the rise in electronic filing, many civil court records remain inaccessible and unused by court administrators and other government actors. Meanwhile, for-profit companies increasingly compile court records into massive datasets that facilitate sophisticated legal analytics. This discrepancy between public and private approaches results in unfulfilled potential for court records to inform court operations, procedural rule making, and substantive policy. This article argues for a future in which courts address these failures and take on the role of data guardians for the public good.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法院是公共利益的数据守护者
在一个日益数字化的世界里,数据驱动的决策和技术增强的工作流程成为常态,民事法院落后了。尽管电子备案有所增加,但法院管理人员和其他政府行为者仍然无法访问和使用许多民事法庭记录。与此同时,营利性公司越来越多地将法庭记录汇编成庞大的数据集,以便于进行复杂的法律分析。公共和私人方法之间的这种差异导致法庭记录为法庭运作、程序规则制定和实质性政策提供信息的潜力未得到实现。这篇文章为法院解决这些失败并为公共利益扮演数据守护者的角色的未来辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Joseph Heath, The Machinery of Government Ableism’s New Clothes: Achievements and Challenges for Disability Rights in Canada A Person Suffering: On Danger and Care in Mental Health Law Interpreting Dicey Against Moralism in Anti-Discrimination Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1