Trust and the behavioral economics of automatic enrollment in pensions: a comparison of the UK and Poland

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Economic Policy Reform Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI:10.1080/17487870.2023.2179488
Kamila Bielawska, J. Turner
{"title":"Trust and the behavioral economics of automatic enrollment in pensions: a comparison of the UK and Poland","authors":"Kamila Bielawska, J. Turner","doi":"10.1080/17487870.2023.2179488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Experience in the UK with auto enrolling workers in pensions indicates that once enrolled, most workers stay enrolled, suggesting that auto enrollment may be a desirable policy for other countries. However, the experience with auto enrollment is much different in Poland. This paper examines the argument that inertia is not a strong force when workers distrust in the security of future pension benefits. We present a simple conceptual framework where trust affects the subjective probability distribution of workers relating to future pension benefits. We investigate how this framework might explain the high opt-out rate in Poland.","PeriodicalId":51737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2023.2179488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Experience in the UK with auto enrolling workers in pensions indicates that once enrolled, most workers stay enrolled, suggesting that auto enrollment may be a desirable policy for other countries. However, the experience with auto enrollment is much different in Poland. This paper examines the argument that inertia is not a strong force when workers distrust in the security of future pension benefits. We present a simple conceptual framework where trust affects the subjective probability distribution of workers relating to future pension benefits. We investigate how this framework might explain the high opt-out rate in Poland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任与养老金自动登记的行为经济学——英国和波兰的比较
摘要英国养老金自动登记的经验表明,一旦登记,大多数工人都会继续登记,这表明自动登记对其他国家来说可能是一项可取的政策。然而,波兰的自动注册体验却大不相同。本文研究了这样一种论点,即当工人不信任未来养老金福利的安全性时,惰性并不是一股强大的力量。我们提出了一个简单的概念框架,其中信任影响工人与未来养老金福利相关的主观概率分布。我们调查了这一框架如何解释波兰的高选择退出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Policy Reform focuses on the analysis of economic policy reform. The journal draws upon what lessons can be learned from the successes and failures of countries undertaking reforms and how existing theories can be developed to shed light on positive as well as normative aspects of the reform process. The Journal of Economic Policy Reform encourages work from economists and political economy analysts on policies to promote growth and reduce poverty, intellectual property rights, aid versus trade, debt and debt relief, taxation and social security systems, surveys of key reform issues, as well as on corruption, democracy, emerging markets and the role of multilateral institutions.
期刊最新文献
When inclusive growth is not enough: advances and limitations of development policies in Uruguay 2005–2019 Shadow economy-income inequality nexus: a panel analysis of West African countries Green and global? A policy frame analysis of the European Investment Bank’s re-branding from 2018–2023 Symposium: digital finance under global uncertainty Exploring the mediating roles of social networks and trust in the blockchain-social sustainability nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1