An empirical survey on prevalence and demographic differences in academic dishonesty among undergraduates from four public universities in China

Xinjuan Liu, Noryati Alias
{"title":"An empirical survey on prevalence and demographic differences in academic dishonesty among undergraduates from four public universities in China","authors":"Xinjuan Liu, Noryati Alias","doi":"10.1108/heed-11-2021-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis empirical survey is conducted to investigate the prevalence rate of academic dishonesty (AD) in examinations and assignments among undergraduates. The study compared the difference in admitted behaviours of academic dishonesty between male and female students comprising second-year, third-year and fourth-year students from the discipline of business, engineering, information technology (IT) and education.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional study was utilized in this study and collected data via the online questionnaire. A total of 1,624 respondents participated from four public universities of four provinces in China Mainland.FindingsThe findings showed that the proportion of respondents from China participating in AD is between 15.4 and 51.7%. The findings showed that more than two-thirds of the respondents stated involved dishonesty in examinations and assignments at least once during the previous academic year. In addition, male and female undergraduates in second-year, third-year and fourth-year showed statistically significant differences in dishonest behaviours. Specifically, the male/senior students were more involved in dishonest behaviours than the females/sophomores.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies, this study found that discipline in the Chinese context was not a significant demographic predictor of dishonesty. Although not significantly different, the respondents majoring in business reported a high engagement rate of dishonesty, followed by engineering and information technology undergraduates, but education undergraduates revealed the lowest engagement rate of dishonesty. The target integrity education should be imparted among male and senior students.","PeriodicalId":32842,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-11-2021-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis empirical survey is conducted to investigate the prevalence rate of academic dishonesty (AD) in examinations and assignments among undergraduates. The study compared the difference in admitted behaviours of academic dishonesty between male and female students comprising second-year, third-year and fourth-year students from the discipline of business, engineering, information technology (IT) and education.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional study was utilized in this study and collected data via the online questionnaire. A total of 1,624 respondents participated from four public universities of four provinces in China Mainland.FindingsThe findings showed that the proportion of respondents from China participating in AD is between 15.4 and 51.7%. The findings showed that more than two-thirds of the respondents stated involved dishonesty in examinations and assignments at least once during the previous academic year. In addition, male and female undergraduates in second-year, third-year and fourth-year showed statistically significant differences in dishonest behaviours. Specifically, the male/senior students were more involved in dishonest behaviours than the females/sophomores.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies, this study found that discipline in the Chinese context was not a significant demographic predictor of dishonesty. Although not significantly different, the respondents majoring in business reported a high engagement rate of dishonesty, followed by engineering and information technology undergraduates, but education undergraduates revealed the lowest engagement rate of dishonesty. The target integrity education should be imparted among male and senior students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国四所公立大学本科生学术失信行为发生率及人口学差异的实证调查
目的本研究旨在调查大学生在考试和作业中学术不诚实的发生率。这项研究比较了来自商科、工程、信息技术和教育专业的二年级、三年级和四年级的男女学生在学术不诚实行为方面的差异。设计/方法/方法本研究采用横断面研究,并通过在线问卷收集数据。共有1624名受访者来自中国大陆4个省份的4所公立大学。调查结果调查结果显示,中国受访者参与AD的比例在15.4%至51.7%之间。调查结果显示,超过三分之二的受访者表示在上一学年至少有一次在考试和作业中作弊。此外,二年级、三年级和四年级的男女大学生在不诚实行为方面存在统计学差异。具体而言,男生/高年级学生比女生/大二学生更容易参与不诚实行为。独创性/价值与以往的研究不同,本研究发现,在中国背景下,纪律并不是不诚实的显著人口预测因素。商业专业的大学生对不诚实行为的参与率最高,其次是工程和信息技术专业的大学生,而教育专业的大学生对不诚实行为的参与率最低。应在男生和高年级学生中开展目标诚信教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ensuring bachelor’s thesis assessment quality: a case study at one Dutch research university Internationalization of quality assurance and the international quality of higher education in Taiwan Micro-credentials and reflections on higher education Exploring the possibilities and challenges in developing the Japanese qualifications framework Commentary: New education policy: shifting gears toward the future of India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1