Editor’s Introduction

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Engineering Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI:10.1080/10429247.2023.2206765
Brian Smith, Jennifer Cross, Simon P. Philbin
{"title":"Editor’s Introduction","authors":"Brian Smith, Jennifer Cross, Simon P. Philbin","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2023.2206765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The idea of hegemony, in its Gramscian sense, contributed to the renewal of several fields of social sciences in the 1970s and 1980s. This idea circulates between different geocultural spaces and different times. The approach adopted in this article starts from the contexts in which this idea is mobilized in order to show to which theoretical and practical stakes it answers. Focusing on four authors (Antonio Gramsci, Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, and Pablo Iglesias) and on the transfers from one author to another, the aim of this paper is to highlight the social conditions conducive to the deployment of the idea of Gramscian hegemony and to identify the (dis)continuities that punctuate its history. Throughout the socio-historical course marked out by the written productions of these four authors, one constant appears: the vitality of the concept of hegemony seems linked to periods of crisis— theoretical and / or strategic—of the Left.","PeriodicalId":54353,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"101 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2023.2206765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The idea of hegemony, in its Gramscian sense, contributed to the renewal of several fields of social sciences in the 1970s and 1980s. This idea circulates between different geocultural spaces and different times. The approach adopted in this article starts from the contexts in which this idea is mobilized in order to show to which theoretical and practical stakes it answers. Focusing on four authors (Antonio Gramsci, Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, and Pablo Iglesias) and on the transfers from one author to another, the aim of this paper is to highlight the social conditions conducive to the deployment of the idea of Gramscian hegemony and to identify the (dis)continuities that punctuate its history. Throughout the socio-historical course marked out by the written productions of these four authors, one constant appears: the vitality of the concept of hegemony seems linked to periods of crisis— theoretical and / or strategic—of the Left.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑器的介绍
摘要:20世纪70年代和80年代,葛兰主义意义上的霸权思想对社会科学的几个领域的更新做出了贡献。这种思想在不同的地理文化空间和不同的时代之间循环。本文采用的方法从调动这一想法的背景出发,以表明它在理论和实践上的利害关系。本文以四位作者(Antonio Gramsci、Ernesto Laclau、Chantal Mouffe和Pablo Iglesias)以及从一位作者到另一位作者的转移为中心,旨在强调有利于葛兰西霸权思想部署的社会条件,并确定贯穿其历史的(dis)连续性。在这四位作者的书面作品所描绘的整个社会历史进程中,有一个不变的现象出现了:霸权概念的生命力似乎与左翼的危机时期——理论和/或战略时期——有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Management Journal
Engineering Management Journal 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: EMJ is designed to provide practical, pertinent knowledge on the management of technology, technical professionals, and technical organizations. EMJ strives to provide value to the practice of engineering management and engineering managers. EMJ is an archival journal that facilitates both practitioners and university faculty in publishing useful articles. The primary focus is on articles that improve the practice of engineering management. To support the practice of engineering management, EMJ publishes papers within key engineering management content areas. EMJ Editors will continue to refine these areas to ensure they are aligned with the challenges faced by technical organizations and technical managers.
期刊最新文献
Lean Office: Proposition and Application of a Process-Mapping Method Based on the Shingo Production Mechanism (SPM) Managing Stakeholder Pressure for Megaproject Success and Green Innovation: The Key Role of Social Responsibility Engineering Management Education: Washington Accord Accreditation Programs The New PAD: A Method to Implement the Lean Construction Principles A Risk Minimization Model for a Multi-Skilled, Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discrete Time-Cost-Quality-Risk Trade-Off
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1