International collaboration and high citation impact – A case analysis of immunology

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.56042/alis.v68i4.50553
N. Satish
{"title":"International collaboration and high citation impact – A case analysis of immunology","authors":"N. Satish","doi":"10.56042/alis.v68i4.50553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bibliometricians emphasize on international collaboration to enhance the citation impact of research publications. However, Mathew Effect for Countries brings out that the citation impact is not uniformly distributed to all country affiliations. The present study explores whether international collaboration helps in neutralizing the origin of country bias. The study explores this with productivity, author affiliation and citation data from Scopus for the immunology papers for the year 2018. The data considered pertain to India and four comparator countries which are high on international collaboration, namely Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. The results point to playout of Mathew Effect and possible confirmation of social constructivist argument of citation practices.","PeriodicalId":42973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v68i4.50553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Bibliometricians emphasize on international collaboration to enhance the citation impact of research publications. However, Mathew Effect for Countries brings out that the citation impact is not uniformly distributed to all country affiliations. The present study explores whether international collaboration helps in neutralizing the origin of country bias. The study explores this with productivity, author affiliation and citation data from Scopus for the immunology papers for the year 2018. The data considered pertain to India and four comparator countries which are high on international collaboration, namely Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. The results point to playout of Mathew Effect and possible confirmation of social constructivist argument of citation practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际合作与高引用影响——免疫学案例分析
文献计量学家强调国际合作,以提高研究出版物的引用影响。然而,国家的马修效应表明,引文影响并不均匀地分布在所有国家。本研究探讨国际合作是否有助于消除国家偏见的根源。该研究通过2018年Scopus免疫学论文的生产率、作者隶属关系和引用数据来探讨这一点。所考虑的数据涉及印度和四个国际合作程度较高的比较国家,即丹麦、瑞典、瑞士和荷兰。研究结果表明了马修效应的发挥,并可能证实社会建构主义关于引文实践的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Library and Information Studies
Annals of Library and Information Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Library and Information Studies is a leading quarterly journal in library and information studies publishing original papers, survey reports, reviews, short communications, and letters pertaining to library science, information science and computer applications in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Annals of Library and Information Studies: Some reflections and future directions A study of ‘calf-path’ in file naming in institutional repositories in India The scope of open peer review in the scholarly publishing ecosystem Collaborative authorship patterns in computer science publications Automatic extraction of significant terms from the title and abstract of scientific papers using the machine learning algorithm: A multiple module approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1