On the religious state, the secular state, and the religion-neutral state

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Critical Research on Religion Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1177/20503032221081837
W. Goldstein
{"title":"On the religious state, the secular state, and the religion-neutral state","authors":"W. Goldstein","doi":"10.1177/20503032221081837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most pressing questions of our age is the relationship between established and disestablished religions and the state. It underlies many of the conflicts across the globe including the treatment of the Rohingya by the Buddhist majority in Myanmar, Muslims under Modi’s Hindu nationalism in India, and Palestinians under the Jewish State of Israel. Many of the world’s conflicts are often driven by conflict between ethnic/religious groups over state control: Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland; Christians and Muslims in Nigeria; and Shiites and Sunnis in Yemen, Syria, and Iraq. The many wars of religion have been driven by states controlled by ethnic/religious majorities. The English Civil War (1640–1660), for instance, was triggered by the attempt to impose the Anglican Church of England over the Presbyterian Church in Scotland. Conflicts between states are often exacerbated by those states being aligned with a religious majority which is at odds with an opposing state-religion alliance (e.g., Iran and Saudi Arabia; India and Pakistan). The state is the vehicle through which an ethno/religious majority can impose its religious values over a society as a whole including minorities. Ethno-religious groups fight over control of the state and if not, over influence on state policy. German-Jewish political philosopher Hannah Arendt ([1943] 2007, 336), who herself was a refugee from Nazi Germany and found a home at the New School’s university in exile in New York, identified this as the problem of the nation-state, which assumes a homogenous ethnic/religious population when there is not. Nation-states, as understood by Arendt ([1944] 2007, 371), cannot exist when there are mixed populations. No country is able to achieve this type of purity and attempts to obtain it have resulted in ethnic cleansing and proven to be catastrophic. The alignment between what we now conventionally categorize as the state on the one hand and religion on the other has existed since the very origins of the state (that is, of monarchies): in the ancient river valley civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia, India (Hinduism), and China (Confucianism). In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the paradigmatic alignment of state and religion is the Davidic kingdom. With Constantine, Christianity became the religion of the Roman state. In Islam, the alignment between state and religion has its origins with the prophet Mohammad, who was both a religious and political leader. The Great Schism between Eastern (Byzantine) and Western Empires was a split between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church in","PeriodicalId":43214,"journal":{"name":"Critical Research on Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032221081837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One of the most pressing questions of our age is the relationship between established and disestablished religions and the state. It underlies many of the conflicts across the globe including the treatment of the Rohingya by the Buddhist majority in Myanmar, Muslims under Modi’s Hindu nationalism in India, and Palestinians under the Jewish State of Israel. Many of the world’s conflicts are often driven by conflict between ethnic/religious groups over state control: Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland; Christians and Muslims in Nigeria; and Shiites and Sunnis in Yemen, Syria, and Iraq. The many wars of religion have been driven by states controlled by ethnic/religious majorities. The English Civil War (1640–1660), for instance, was triggered by the attempt to impose the Anglican Church of England over the Presbyterian Church in Scotland. Conflicts between states are often exacerbated by those states being aligned with a religious majority which is at odds with an opposing state-religion alliance (e.g., Iran and Saudi Arabia; India and Pakistan). The state is the vehicle through which an ethno/religious majority can impose its religious values over a society as a whole including minorities. Ethno-religious groups fight over control of the state and if not, over influence on state policy. German-Jewish political philosopher Hannah Arendt ([1943] 2007, 336), who herself was a refugee from Nazi Germany and found a home at the New School’s university in exile in New York, identified this as the problem of the nation-state, which assumes a homogenous ethnic/religious population when there is not. Nation-states, as understood by Arendt ([1944] 2007, 371), cannot exist when there are mixed populations. No country is able to achieve this type of purity and attempts to obtain it have resulted in ethnic cleansing and proven to be catastrophic. The alignment between what we now conventionally categorize as the state on the one hand and religion on the other has existed since the very origins of the state (that is, of monarchies): in the ancient river valley civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia, India (Hinduism), and China (Confucianism). In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the paradigmatic alignment of state and religion is the Davidic kingdom. With Constantine, Christianity became the religion of the Roman state. In Islam, the alignment between state and religion has its origins with the prophet Mohammad, who was both a religious and political leader. The Great Schism between Eastern (Byzantine) and Western Empires was a split between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论宗教国家、世俗国家与宗教中立国家
我们这个时代最紧迫的问题之一是宗教与国家之间的关系。它是全球许多冲突的根源,包括缅甸占多数的佛教徒对罗兴亚人的待遇,印度莫迪的印度教民族主义对穆斯林的待遇,以及犹太国家以色列对巴勒斯坦人的待遇。世界上的许多冲突往往是由种族/宗教团体之间争夺国家控制权的冲突引起的:北爱尔兰的新教徒和天主教徒;尼日利亚的基督徒和穆斯林;也门、叙利亚和伊拉克的什叶派和逊尼派。许多宗教战争是由民族/宗教多数派控制的国家推动的。例如,英国内战(1640年至1660年)就是由企图将英格兰圣公会强加于苏格兰长老会而引发的。国家之间的冲突往往会因为一些国家与一个宗教占多数的国家结盟而加剧,而这个国家与另一个反对的国家-宗教联盟(例如伊朗和沙特阿拉伯;印度和巴基斯坦)。国家是一个工具,通过它,一个民族/宗教多数派可以将其宗教价值观强加于包括少数民族在内的整个社会。民族和宗教团体争夺对国家的控制权,如果没有,也会争夺对国家政策的影响力。德裔犹太政治哲学家汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt,[1943] 2007, 336)自己也是纳粹德国的难民,在纽约流亡期间在新学院大学找到了一个家,她认为这是民族国家的问题,它假设了一个同质的种族/宗教人口,而实际上并没有。阿伦特([1944]2007,371)所理解的民族国家在人口混合的情况下是不可能存在的。没有一个国家能够达到这种纯度,而获得这种纯度的企图导致了种族清洗,并被证明是灾难性的。从国家(即君主制)的起源开始,我们现在传统上归类为国家和宗教之间的一致性就存在了:在埃及、美索不达米亚、印度(印度教)和中国(儒家)等古老的河谷文明中。在犹太教和基督教的传统中,国家和宗教的典型结盟是大卫王国。随着君士坦丁的到来,基督教成为了罗马的国教。在伊斯兰教中,国家与宗教的结盟源于先知穆罕默德,他是一位宗教和政治领袖。东(拜占庭)帝国和西帝国之间的大分裂是罗马天主教会和东正教会之间的分裂
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Critical Research on Religion is a peer-reviewed, international journal focusing on the development of a critical theoretical framework and its application to research on religion. It provides a common venue for those engaging in critical analysis in theology and religious studies, as well as for those who critically study religion in the other social sciences and humanities such as philosophy, sociology, anthropology, psychology, history, and literature. A critical approach examines religious phenomena according to both their positive and negative impacts. It draws on methods including but not restricted to the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Marxism, post-structuralism, feminism, psychoanalysis, ideological criticism, post-colonialism, ecocriticism, and queer studies. The journal seeks to enhance an understanding of how religious institutions and religious thought may simultaneously serve as a source of domination and progressive social change. It attempts to understand the role of religion within social and political conflicts. These conflicts are often based on differences of race, class, ethnicity, region, gender, and sexual orientation – all of which are shaped by social, political, and economic inequity. The journal encourages submissions of theoretically guided articles on current issues as well as those with historical interest using a wide range of methodologies including qualitative, quantitative, and archival. It publishes articles, review essays, book reviews, thematic issues, symposia, and interviews.
期刊最新文献
Reproducing whiteness? A critical race analysis of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ process for drafting the framework for secondary religious education Hegemonic fundamentalism in Wichita, Kansas: The Defenders of the Christian Faith, 1926-1931 Measuring the strength of belief in the supernatural entities in the Babylonian Talmud. A method based on the Elyonim veTachtonim project Book Review: Resurrecting the Jew: Nationalism, Philosemitism, and Poland’s Jewish Revival Book Review: Minority Churches as Media Settlers: Negotiating Deep Mediatization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1