Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl for sedation during awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Indian Journal of Respiratory Care Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-11010-02211
Tajammul Sayeed, A. Shenoy, U. Goneppanavar
{"title":"Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl for sedation during awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation","authors":"Tajammul Sayeed, A. Shenoy, U. Goneppanavar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-11010-02211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several drugs have been used to enhance patient comfort during awake nasal fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) process. Most of these can cause dangerous airway or haemodynamic compromise. This study compared combination of midazolam and fentanyl against dexmedetomidine. Methods: Thirty two adults undergoing AFOI were randomly allocated into group MF (1mg midazolam and 1 µg/kg fentanyl) or group D (dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg over 10 minutes). Following standard airway topicalisation technique, the study drugs were administered and AFOI was performed. Results: The demographic data, patient comfort score, post intubation score, endoscopy and intubation times were comparable. The endoscopy was observed to be easy in all patients except 2 in MF group while intubation was easy in all (group D) versus 12 patients in group MF (P value 0.03). Significant haemodynamic response was observed in group MF while patients were more stable in group D. Postoperatively, 10 and two patients in groups D and MF respectively felt sedation was excellent (P value 0.02) while increased need for sedation was felt by one and three patients in groups D and MF respectively (P value 0.028). AFOI was remembered by six and one patients in groups D and MF respectively (P value 0.003). Two in group D and three in group MF had moderate discomfort. None experienced severe discomfort. The overall satisfaction score was comparable. There were no serious adverse events during the study. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine provides better intubating conditions and patient satisfaction without adversely affecting the airway or haemodynamic stability during AFOI","PeriodicalId":53846,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Respiratory Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Respiratory Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11010-02211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several drugs have been used to enhance patient comfort during awake nasal fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) process. Most of these can cause dangerous airway or haemodynamic compromise. This study compared combination of midazolam and fentanyl against dexmedetomidine. Methods: Thirty two adults undergoing AFOI were randomly allocated into group MF (1mg midazolam and 1 µg/kg fentanyl) or group D (dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg over 10 minutes). Following standard airway topicalisation technique, the study drugs were administered and AFOI was performed. Results: The demographic data, patient comfort score, post intubation score, endoscopy and intubation times were comparable. The endoscopy was observed to be easy in all patients except 2 in MF group while intubation was easy in all (group D) versus 12 patients in group MF (P value 0.03). Significant haemodynamic response was observed in group MF while patients were more stable in group D. Postoperatively, 10 and two patients in groups D and MF respectively felt sedation was excellent (P value 0.02) while increased need for sedation was felt by one and three patients in groups D and MF respectively (P value 0.028). AFOI was remembered by six and one patients in groups D and MF respectively (P value 0.003). Two in group D and three in group MF had moderate discomfort. None experienced severe discomfort. The overall satisfaction score was comparable. There were no serious adverse events during the study. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine provides better intubating conditions and patient satisfaction without adversely affecting the airway or haemodynamic stability during AFOI
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定与咪达唑仑和芬太尼联合用于清醒纤维鼻气管插管镇静的安全性和有效性比较
在清醒的鼻纤维插管(AFOI)过程中,一些药物被用来提高患者的舒适度。其中大多数会导致危险的气道或血流动力学损害。本研究比较了咪达唑仑和芬太尼与右美托咪定的联合应用。方法:32例成人AFOI患者随机分为MF组(咪达唑仑1mg +芬太尼1µg/kg)和D组(右美托咪定1µg/kg / 10min)。遵循标准气道局部化技术,给予研究药物并进行AFOI。结果:人口学数据、患者舒适度评分、插管后评分、内镜检查和插管时间具有可比性。除MF组2例患者外,其余患者内镜检查均顺利,插管均顺利(D组),而MF组12例患者插管均顺利(P值0.03)。术后,D组和MF组分别有10例和2例患者感觉镇静效果极好(P值为0.02),D组和MF组分别有1例和3例患者感觉镇静需求增加(P值为0.028)。D组和MF组分别有6例和1例患者记得AFOI (P值0.003)。D组2例,MF组3例出现中度不适。没有人感到严重不适。总体满意度得分相当。研究期间未发生严重不良事件。结论:右美托咪定提供了更好的插管条件和患者满意度,而不会对AFOI期间的气道或血流动力学稳定性产生不利影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Panel of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: An Observational Study Precision Medicine in Respiratory Care: Where do We Stand Now? A Study of COVID-19 Infected Patients with Tuberculosis as Comorbidity and on Antitubercular Drug Therapy Paradigm Shift in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Pulmonary Nocardiosis with Esophageal Involvement: A Rare Imaging Finding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1