Making the Globe: A Cultural History of Science in the Bay of Bengal

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY Cultural History Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.3366/cult.2020.0222
S. Sivasundaram
{"title":"Making the Globe: A Cultural History of Science in the Bay of Bengal","authors":"S. Sivasundaram","doi":"10.3366/cult.2020.0222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from Madras, travelling across the Bay of Bengal, to the coast of Sumatra and then to Singapore, this paper provides a cultural history of nineteenth-century knowledge-making as an enterprise in making and breaking three concepts: globe, empire and self. It does so by working outwards from early-nineteenth century pendulum-length experiments to determine the curvature of the Earth. It argues that moving across concepts and scales was vital to a regime of big data. Data-crunching involved different sciences and split across territories and sea and land. As the project of making the globe proceeded, for instance from Madras Observatory, imperial settlements could be located precisely as coordinates, for instance British Singapore, and indigenous intellectuals, like Abdullah bin Abdul Kadir (1797–1854), had to find their place in a world of imperial free trade. Global model-making brought about a detachment from individuals and locations as people and places were fixed on a globe and it led to the erasure of the indigenous informant, a key figure in recent histories of science. In linking the making of the globe to the fate of intermediary, the argument urges the need to place indigenous agency in the sciences within wider accounts of labour, capital and imperial expansion.","PeriodicalId":41779,"journal":{"name":"Cultural History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/cult.2020.0222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starting from Madras, travelling across the Bay of Bengal, to the coast of Sumatra and then to Singapore, this paper provides a cultural history of nineteenth-century knowledge-making as an enterprise in making and breaking three concepts: globe, empire and self. It does so by working outwards from early-nineteenth century pendulum-length experiments to determine the curvature of the Earth. It argues that moving across concepts and scales was vital to a regime of big data. Data-crunching involved different sciences and split across territories and sea and land. As the project of making the globe proceeded, for instance from Madras Observatory, imperial settlements could be located precisely as coordinates, for instance British Singapore, and indigenous intellectuals, like Abdullah bin Abdul Kadir (1797–1854), had to find their place in a world of imperial free trade. Global model-making brought about a detachment from individuals and locations as people and places were fixed on a globe and it led to the erasure of the indigenous informant, a key figure in recent histories of science. In linking the making of the globe to the fate of intermediary, the argument urges the need to place indigenous agency in the sciences within wider accounts of labour, capital and imperial expansion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《制造地球:孟加拉湾的科学文化史》
从马德拉斯出发,穿越孟加拉湾,到达苏门答腊岛海岸,然后到达新加坡,本文提供了19世纪知识制造的文化史,作为一种创造和打破三个概念的企业:全球、帝国和自我。它是通过从19世纪早期的钟摆长度实验向外研究来确定地球的曲率的。它认为,跨越概念和尺度对大数据制度至关重要。数据处理涉及不同的科学,并在领土、海洋和陆地上分散开来。随着制作地球的工程的进行,例如从马德拉斯天文台开始,帝国的定居点可以精确地定位为坐标,例如英属新加坡,而像阿卜杜拉·本·阿卜杜勒·卡迪尔(1797-1854)这样的土著知识分子必须在帝国自由贸易的世界中找到自己的位置。全球模型制作带来了与个人和地点的分离,因为人们和地方都固定在一个地球上,它导致了土著信息的抹去,这是近代科学史上的一个关键人物。在将地球的形成与中介的命运联系起来的过程中,该论点敦促有必要在更广泛的劳动力、资本和帝国扩张的背景下,将科学中的本土机构置于其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural History
Cultural History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
‘He had thoughtlessly accepted certain gifts’: Corruption and Normative Behaviour for Roman Magistrates Discursive Constructions of Corruption in Ancient Rome: Introduction Why a Focus on Spatial History? Competition and Corruption: Sodalicia in Late Republican Rome Review of Doing Spatial History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1