Lifestyle, Longevity, and Legacy Risks with Annuities in Retirement Portfolio Decumulation

Sanjiv Ranjan Das, Daniel N. Ostrov, Anand Radhakrishnan, Deep Srivastav
{"title":"Lifestyle, Longevity, and Legacy Risks with Annuities in Retirement Portfolio Decumulation","authors":"Sanjiv Ranjan Das, Daniel N. Ostrov, Anand Radhakrishnan, Deep Srivastav","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2023.1.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investors planning for retirement balance three Ls: (1) lifestyle risk, hoping to maintain a consumption stream that provides a chosen standard of living; (2) longevity risk, hoping to remain solvent throughout their lifetime; and (3) legacy risk, hoping to leave a bequest to their heirs. We solve this multiple objective problem for a wide range of consumption and annuitization scenarios. For each scenario, we apply dynamic programming to optimally evolve the investments in the non-annuitized portion of the portfolio so as to minimize longevity risk. Our dynamic programming approach has the advantages of (1) generating results that are far superior to what standard Monte Carlo methods, static portfolios, and target date fund glide paths can provide and (2) not requiring utility functions, which are hard to specify for individuals. We show that investors who want to minimize their longevity and legacy risk and who are unable to annuitize their full consumption stream are best off avoiding even partial annuitization of their portfolio. For investors who are able to annuitize their full consumption stream, we quantify their longevity versus legacy risk trade-offs, enabling them to select the best annuity for their needs.","PeriodicalId":39998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wealth Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"9 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wealth Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2023.1.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investors planning for retirement balance three Ls: (1) lifestyle risk, hoping to maintain a consumption stream that provides a chosen standard of living; (2) longevity risk, hoping to remain solvent throughout their lifetime; and (3) legacy risk, hoping to leave a bequest to their heirs. We solve this multiple objective problem for a wide range of consumption and annuitization scenarios. For each scenario, we apply dynamic programming to optimally evolve the investments in the non-annuitized portion of the portfolio so as to minimize longevity risk. Our dynamic programming approach has the advantages of (1) generating results that are far superior to what standard Monte Carlo methods, static portfolios, and target date fund glide paths can provide and (2) not requiring utility functions, which are hard to specify for individuals. We show that investors who want to minimize their longevity and legacy risk and who are unable to annuitize their full consumption stream are best off avoiding even partial annuitization of their portfolio. For investors who are able to annuitize their full consumption stream, we quantify their longevity versus legacy risk trade-offs, enabling them to select the best annuity for their needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退休投资组合中年金的生活方式、寿命和遗产风险
计划退休的投资者要平衡三个l:(1)生活方式风险,希望维持一种消费流,提供一种选定的生活水平;(2)长寿风险,希望一生都有偿付能力;(3)遗产风险,希望给他们的继承人留下遗产。我们为广泛的消费和年金化场景解决了这个多目标问题。对于每种情况,我们应用动态规划来优化投资组合中非年金化部分的投资,以使长寿风险最小化。我们的动态规划方法具有以下优点:(1)产生的结果远远优于标准蒙特卡罗方法、静态投资组合和目标日期基金滑动路径所能提供的结果;(2)不需要效用函数,这对个人来说很难指定。我们的研究表明,如果投资者希望将自己的寿命和遗产风险降到最低,并且无法将其全部消费流进行年化,那么最好避免将其投资组合部分年化。对于能够将其全部消费流年金化的投资者,我们量化了他们的寿命与遗留风险权衡,使他们能够选择最适合自己需求的年金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wealth Management
Journal of Wealth Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
The Safe-Haven and Hedging Properties of Agricultural Commodities Editor’s Letter Adding Art to Your Portfolio: A New Risk Assessment Framework Corporate Ownership of Fine Art: Firm Valuation, Societal Impacts, and Philanthropy Asset Allocation—Commodities or Commodity Stocks?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1