{"title":"Evaluating Temporal Delays and Spatial Gaps in Overshoot-avoiding Mouse-pointing Operations","authors":"Shota Yamanaka","doi":"10.20380/GI2020.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For hover-based UIs (e.g., pop-up windows) and scrollable UIs, we investigated mouse-pointing performance for users trying to avoid overshooting a target while aiming for it. Three experiments were conducted with a 1D pointing task in which overshooting was accepted (a) within a temporal delay, (b) via a spatial gap between the target and an unintended item, and (c) with both a delay and a gap. We found that, in general, movement times tended to increase with a shorter delay and a smaller gap if these parameters were independently tested. Therefore, Fitts’ law cannot accurately predict the movement times when various values of delay and/or gap are used. We found that 800 ms is required to remove negative effects of distractor for densely arranged targets, but we found no optimal gap.","PeriodicalId":93493,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","volume":"1 1","pages":"440-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2020.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
For hover-based UIs (e.g., pop-up windows) and scrollable UIs, we investigated mouse-pointing performance for users trying to avoid overshooting a target while aiming for it. Three experiments were conducted with a 1D pointing task in which overshooting was accepted (a) within a temporal delay, (b) via a spatial gap between the target and an unintended item, and (c) with both a delay and a gap. We found that, in general, movement times tended to increase with a shorter delay and a smaller gap if these parameters were independently tested. Therefore, Fitts’ law cannot accurately predict the movement times when various values of delay and/or gap are used. We found that 800 ms is required to remove negative effects of distractor for densely arranged targets, but we found no optimal gap.