Implementation of Sustainable Public Procurement in the Rail Transport in the Czech Republic and a Comparison with the Other Members of the Visegrad Group

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.2478/nispa-2022-0008
M. Páleníková, Ondřej Špetík, Robert Páleník, Jan Ilík, Michal Adamík
{"title":"Implementation of Sustainable Public Procurement in the Rail Transport in the Czech Republic and a Comparison with the Other Members of the Visegrad Group","authors":"M. Páleníková, Ondřej Špetík, Robert Páleník, Jan Ilík, Michal Adamík","doi":"10.2478/nispa-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper focuses on sustainable public procurement (SPP) and its role in public procurement of the members of the Visegrad Group (Hungarian, Poland, Slovakia, Czech Republic). Sustainable public procurement is a current trend in public purchasing around the world. The European Union’s sustainable development policy, which respects the objectives of the 2030 Agenda, seeks to influence the public procurement policies of the members of the European Union. Every country, including the Visegard Group countries is trying to implement sustainable development criteria in its procurement process and to change legislation. The aim of this paper is to compare the implementation of public procurement in the Czech Republic with other members of the Visegrad Group (Poland, Slovakia, Hungary) and analyse how the public procurement (tenders) respects the criteria of sustainable public procurement in the case of the selected public procurements (tenders) in rail transport. We analyse the public procurement process and investigate the possibility/appropriateness of using social responsibility criteria in the individual phases of the procurement process (award criteria). The results show that there are different methods of implementing SPP in the V4 countries. There are significant differences between the regions. Based on the results of our research and analysis of the selected tenders, we concluded that the principle of social responsibility needs to be reflected in all steps, i.e. in the formulation of the subject of the public contract, the preparation of the contractual terms and the selection of evaluation criteria in their qualitative form.","PeriodicalId":43378,"journal":{"name":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on sustainable public procurement (SPP) and its role in public procurement of the members of the Visegrad Group (Hungarian, Poland, Slovakia, Czech Republic). Sustainable public procurement is a current trend in public purchasing around the world. The European Union’s sustainable development policy, which respects the objectives of the 2030 Agenda, seeks to influence the public procurement policies of the members of the European Union. Every country, including the Visegard Group countries is trying to implement sustainable development criteria in its procurement process and to change legislation. The aim of this paper is to compare the implementation of public procurement in the Czech Republic with other members of the Visegrad Group (Poland, Slovakia, Hungary) and analyse how the public procurement (tenders) respects the criteria of sustainable public procurement in the case of the selected public procurements (tenders) in rail transport. We analyse the public procurement process and investigate the possibility/appropriateness of using social responsibility criteria in the individual phases of the procurement process (award criteria). The results show that there are different methods of implementing SPP in the V4 countries. There are significant differences between the regions. Based on the results of our research and analysis of the selected tenders, we concluded that the principle of social responsibility needs to be reflected in all steps, i.e. in the formulation of the subject of the public contract, the preparation of the contractual terms and the selection of evaluation criteria in their qualitative form.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克共和国铁路运输中可持续公共采购的实施及其与维谢格拉德集团其他成员的比较
摘要本文主要研究了维谢格拉德集团成员国(匈牙利、波兰、斯洛伐克、捷克共和国)的可持续公共采购(SPP)及其在公共采购中的作用。可持续公共采购是当前全球公共采购的一个趋势。欧洲联盟的可持续发展政策尊重《2030年议程》的目标,力求影响欧洲联盟成员国的公共采购政策。每个国家,包括维西加德集团国家,都在努力在其采购过程中执行可持续发展标准,并改变立法。本文的目的是比较捷克共和国与维谢格拉德集团的其他成员(波兰,斯洛伐克,匈牙利)的公共采购实施情况,并分析公共采购(招标)如何尊重铁路运输中选定的公共采购(招标)的可持续公共采购标准。我们分析公共采购过程,并调查在采购过程的各个阶段(奖励标准)使用社会责任标准的可能性/适当性。结果表明,V4国家实施SPP的方法不同。这些地区之间存在显著差异。通过对中标项目的研究和分析,我们得出结论,社会责任原则需要体现在公共合同主体的制定、合同条款的制定以及定性评价标准的选择等各个环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The 2020 Czech Regional Elections in the Shadow of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Electoral Participation in the Spread of the Pandemic Innovation Policy Coordination: The Role of Communication for Uzbekistan Collaborative Approach on Digital Government Transformation: In-Depth Analysis from Expert Interview Public Policy Failure: The Case of Arts and Sports Policy in Kazakhstan Citizens’ Satisfaction with “Citizens’ Initiatives”: The Case of the Municipality of Ljubljana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1