SCREENING FOR BID RIGGING—DOES IT WORK?

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Competition Law & Economics Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1093/JOCLEC/NHY006
David Imhof, Yavuz Karagök, Samuel Rutz
{"title":"SCREENING FOR BID RIGGING—DOES IT WORK?","authors":"David Imhof, Yavuz Karagök, Samuel Rutz","doi":"10.1093/JOCLEC/NHY006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a method to detect bid-rigging by applying mutually reinforcing screens to a road construction procurement data set from Switzerland in which no prior information about collusion was available. The screening method is particularly suited to deal with the problem of partial collusion, i.e. collusion which does not involve all firms and/or all contracts in a specific data set, implying that many of the classical markers discussed in the corresponding literature will fail to identify bid-rigging. In addition to presenting a new screen for collusion, it is shown how benchmarks and the combination of different screens may be used to identify subsets of suspicious contracts and firms in a data set. The discussed screening method succeeds in isolating a group of “suspicious” firms exhibiting the characteristics of a local bid-rigging cartel operating with cover bids and a – more or less pronounced – bid rotation scheme. Based on these findings the Swiss Competition Commission (ComCo) decided to open an investigation.","PeriodicalId":45547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/JOCLEC/NHY006","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JOCLEC/NHY006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

This paper proposes a method to detect bid-rigging by applying mutually reinforcing screens to a road construction procurement data set from Switzerland in which no prior information about collusion was available. The screening method is particularly suited to deal with the problem of partial collusion, i.e. collusion which does not involve all firms and/or all contracts in a specific data set, implying that many of the classical markers discussed in the corresponding literature will fail to identify bid-rigging. In addition to presenting a new screen for collusion, it is shown how benchmarks and the combination of different screens may be used to identify subsets of suspicious contracts and firms in a data set. The discussed screening method succeeds in isolating a group of “suspicious” firms exhibiting the characteristics of a local bid-rigging cartel operating with cover bids and a – more or less pronounced – bid rotation scheme. Based on these findings the Swiss Competition Commission (ComCo) decided to open an investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛选操纵投标——有效吗?
本文提出了一种方法,通过对瑞士的道路建设采购数据集应用相互增强的屏蔽来检测投标操纵,在该数据集中没有关于串通的事先信息。筛选方法特别适用于处理部分串通问题,即串通不涉及特定数据集中的所有公司和/或所有合同,这意味着相应文献中讨论的许多经典标记将无法识别投标操纵。除了提供一个新的共谋屏幕外,还展示了如何使用基准和不同屏幕的组合来识别数据集中可疑合同和公司的子集。所讨论的筛选方法成功地隔离了一组“可疑”公司,这些公司表现出当地操纵投标卡特尔的特征,通过掩护投标和或多或少明显的投标轮换计划运作。根据这些调查结果,瑞士竞争委员会决定展开调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
26.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Requisite Legal Standard of the Digital Markets Act’s Designation Process Price Effects of Horizontal Mergers: A Retrospective on Retrospectives ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE PROVISIONS MERGING LAGGARDS The Effective Use of Economics in the EU Digital Markets Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1