{"title":"Nonlinear dynamic process monitoring using deep dynamic principal component analysis","authors":"Simin Li, Shuang-hua Yang, Yi Cao, Zuzhen Ji","doi":"10.1080/21642583.2021.2024915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data-driven method has gained its popularity in fault detection. Conventional methods are associated with one-single-layer process monitoring. Information extracted by such a method may not be sufficient to detect some faults for complicated process systems. Inspired by the deep learning conception, a multi-layer fault detection method, namely Deep Principal Component Analysis (DePCA) was proposed previously in the literature. DePCA has the capability to extract deep features for a process resulting in better fault detection performance. However, it assumes that the value of the variable at each moment is unrelated, which is not suitable for complex nonlinear dynamic system. To address the concerns, by adopting dynamic PCA to extract dynamic features, a new deep approach, namely Deep Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DeDPCA), is proposed. In the new approach, both Dynamic feature and nonlinear feature can be extracted in different layers so that more process faults can be detected. A Tennessee Eastman process case study was then employed for application and validation of the DeDPCA, which indicates the proposed method is suitable for monitoring complex dynamic nonlinear processes.","PeriodicalId":46282,"journal":{"name":"Systems Science & Control Engineering","volume":"10 1","pages":"55 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Science & Control Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2021.2024915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Data-driven method has gained its popularity in fault detection. Conventional methods are associated with one-single-layer process monitoring. Information extracted by such a method may not be sufficient to detect some faults for complicated process systems. Inspired by the deep learning conception, a multi-layer fault detection method, namely Deep Principal Component Analysis (DePCA) was proposed previously in the literature. DePCA has the capability to extract deep features for a process resulting in better fault detection performance. However, it assumes that the value of the variable at each moment is unrelated, which is not suitable for complex nonlinear dynamic system. To address the concerns, by adopting dynamic PCA to extract dynamic features, a new deep approach, namely Deep Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DeDPCA), is proposed. In the new approach, both Dynamic feature and nonlinear feature can be extracted in different layers so that more process faults can be detected. A Tennessee Eastman process case study was then employed for application and validation of the DeDPCA, which indicates the proposed method is suitable for monitoring complex dynamic nonlinear processes.
数据驱动方法在故障检测中得到了广泛的应用。传统方法与单层过程监控相关联。用这种方法提取的信息可能不足以检测复杂过程系统的某些故障。在深度学习概念的启发下,已有文献提出了一种多层故障检测方法,即深度主成分分析(deep Principal Component Analysis, DePCA)。DePCA能够为过程提取深层特征,从而获得更好的故障检测性能。但是,该方法假定各时刻变量的值是不相关的,不适合复杂的非线性动力系统。为了解决这些问题,采用动态主成分分析方法提取动态特征,提出了一种新的深度方法——深度动态主成分分析(deep dynamic Principal Component Analysis, DeDPCA)。该方法可以同时提取不同层次的动态特征和非线性特征,从而检测出更多的过程故障。以田纳西州伊士曼过程为例,对该方法进行了应用和验证,结果表明该方法适用于复杂动态非线性过程的监测。
期刊介绍:
Systems Science & Control Engineering is a world-leading fully open access journal covering all areas of theoretical and applied systems science and control engineering. The journal encourages the submission of original articles, reviews and short communications in areas including, but not limited to: · artificial intelligence · complex systems · complex networks · control theory · control applications · cybernetics · dynamical systems theory · operations research · systems biology · systems dynamics · systems ecology · systems engineering · systems psychology · systems theory