DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF NUMBER OF FRAGMENTED QRS LEADS IN PREDICTION OF CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pakistan Heart Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.47144/phj.v55i4.2262
Mohammad Assadian Rad, H. Moladoust, A. Pourrajabi, Zohreh Heidarnezhad, Amir Savarrakhsh
{"title":"DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF NUMBER OF FRAGMENTED QRS LEADS IN PREDICTION OF CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE","authors":"Mohammad Assadian Rad, H. Moladoust, A. Pourrajabi, Zohreh Heidarnezhad, Amir Savarrakhsh","doi":"10.47144/phj.v55i4.2262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of fragmented QRS (fQRS) numbers in surface electrocardiogram (ECG) in heart failure (HF) patients for prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) non-responders.\nMethodology: In this study, patients with HF who were candidates for CRT implantation were enrolled. A 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was conducted with the aim of finding fQRS. Presence of more than 2 notching in the R or S wave in wide QRS complexes in at least two adjacent leads corresponding to a coronary bed, considered as fQRS. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography 3-6 months after the CRT implantation for the evaluation of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV), Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV), and Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). The data were analyzed by SPSS v.22 software. P-value of less than 0.05 considered significant.\nResults: We investigated on a total of 73 patients with HF that 64.38% of them responded to CRT. Most of responders were patients without fQRS complexes (80%). LVEF, LVESV, and LVEDV were different significantly before and after CRT implantation in patients with fQRS (p<0.001). Our results showed that the presence of at least one fQRS can lead to non-responsiveness to CRT. Therefore, we take cut-off point equal-greater than one into account as the best cut-off point for response to CRT. The area under the curve (AUC) for CRT prediction was 0.715 (95% CI: 0.598-0.815, P=0.003).\nConclusion: In conclusion, the presence of even one fQRS in the surface ECG can predict CRT non-responsiveness with good accuracy.","PeriodicalId":42273,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v55i4.2262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of fragmented QRS (fQRS) numbers in surface electrocardiogram (ECG) in heart failure (HF) patients for prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) non-responders. Methodology: In this study, patients with HF who were candidates for CRT implantation were enrolled. A 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was conducted with the aim of finding fQRS. Presence of more than 2 notching in the R or S wave in wide QRS complexes in at least two adjacent leads corresponding to a coronary bed, considered as fQRS. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography 3-6 months after the CRT implantation for the evaluation of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV), Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV), and Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). The data were analyzed by SPSS v.22 software. P-value of less than 0.05 considered significant. Results: We investigated on a total of 73 patients with HF that 64.38% of them responded to CRT. Most of responders were patients without fQRS complexes (80%). LVEF, LVESV, and LVEDV were different significantly before and after CRT implantation in patients with fQRS (p<0.001). Our results showed that the presence of at least one fQRS can lead to non-responsiveness to CRT. Therefore, we take cut-off point equal-greater than one into account as the best cut-off point for response to CRT. The area under the curve (AUC) for CRT prediction was 0.715 (95% CI: 0.598-0.815, P=0.003). Conclusion: In conclusion, the presence of even one fQRS in the surface ECG can predict CRT non-responsiveness with good accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测心衰患者心脏再同步化治疗反应的碎片化QRS导联数的诊断准确性
目的:探讨心衰(HF)患者体表心电图(ECG)碎片化QRS (fQRS)数在预测心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)无反应患者中的诊断准确性。方法学:本研究纳入了适合CRT植入的HF患者。为了寻找fQRS,进行了12导联表面心电图。在至少两个相邻导联对应于冠状动脉床的宽QRS复合物中,R波或S波存在2个以上缺口,视为fQRS。所有患者在CRT植入后3-6个月行经胸超声心动图评估左室舒张末容积(LVEDV)、左室收缩末容积(LVESV)和左室射血分数(LVEF)。采用SPSS v.22软件对数据进行分析。p值小于0.05认为显著。结果:我们共调查了73例HF患者,其中64.38%的患者对CRT有应答。大多数应答者为无fQRS复合物的患者(80%)。fQRS患者植入CRT前后LVEF、LVESV、LVEDV差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。我们的研究结果表明,至少一个fQRS的存在会导致对CRT无反应。因此,我们考虑等于大于1的截断点作为CRT响应的最佳截断点。曲线下面积(AUC)为0.715 (95% CI: 0.598-0.815, P=0.003)。结论:体表心电图中即使有一个fQRS,也能较准确地预测CRT无反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Heart Journal
Pakistan Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Food and Cardiovascular Disease: What to Eat and What Not to Eat A Retrospective Chart Review of the Head-Up Tilt Table Test at a Tertiary Care University Hospital Improving Quality Health Care Services by Implementing DMAIC Approach in Paediatric Cardiology Department of Public Hospital of Sindh, Pakistan: A Case Study Association of Body Mass Index with Peripheral Vascular Resistance Obesity from Clinical Evaluation to Management Local Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1