American Museums and Colonial-Era Provenance: A Proposal

IF 0.6 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Cultural Property Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI:10.1017/s0940739123000036
Victoria S. Reed
{"title":"American Museums and Colonial-Era Provenance: A Proposal","authors":"Victoria S. Reed","doi":"10.1017/s0940739123000036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As European nations address their legacy of colonialism, many museums in France, Germany, Great Britain, and elsewhere in Western Europe are examining the provenance of objects in their collections that were removed during periods of colonial occupation and, in some cases, have developed plans for their restitution. As of 2022, few museums in the United States have announced similar objectives. This article offers specific suggestions for American art museums to proceed proactively and transparently with colonial-era provenance research projects. I propose that museums identify objects in their collections that were displaced in one of two ways: either looted during a post-Napoleonic military conflict or stolen or traded by force under a period of colonial occupation. These works of art should be prioritized for provenance research and listed or otherwise made discoverable online. By listing these objects on their websites, museums will acknowledge the contentious histories of works of art in their collections and signal an openness to engaging with source communities, whether about the return of an object, loans, storage, display, educational initiatives, or other matters of care.","PeriodicalId":54155,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cultural Property","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cultural Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0940739123000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As European nations address their legacy of colonialism, many museums in France, Germany, Great Britain, and elsewhere in Western Europe are examining the provenance of objects in their collections that were removed during periods of colonial occupation and, in some cases, have developed plans for their restitution. As of 2022, few museums in the United States have announced similar objectives. This article offers specific suggestions for American art museums to proceed proactively and transparently with colonial-era provenance research projects. I propose that museums identify objects in their collections that were displaced in one of two ways: either looted during a post-Napoleonic military conflict or stolen or traded by force under a period of colonial occupation. These works of art should be prioritized for provenance research and listed or otherwise made discoverable online. By listing these objects on their websites, museums will acknowledge the contentious histories of works of art in their collections and signal an openness to engaging with source communities, whether about the return of an object, loans, storage, display, educational initiatives, or other matters of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国博物馆和殖民时代的起源:一个建议
在欧洲国家处理殖民主义遗留问题的同时,法国、德国、英国和西欧其他地方的许多博物馆正在研究在殖民占领期间被移走的藏品的来源,在某些情况下,还制定了归还这些藏品的计划。截至2022年,美国很少有博物馆宣布类似的目标。本文为美国艺术博物馆积极、透明地开展殖民时期文物来源研究项目提供了具体建议。我建议博物馆对藏品中因以下两种方式之一而流离失所的物品进行鉴定:要么在后拿破仑军事冲突期间被掠夺,要么在殖民占领期间被偷窃或用武力交易。这些艺术作品应该优先进行来源研究,并在网上列出或以其他方式被发现。通过在其网站上列出这些物品,博物馆将承认其收藏的艺术作品有争议的历史,并表明他们愿意与来源社区接触,无论是关于物品的归还、贷款、存储、展示、教育倡议,还是其他关怀事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cultural Property
International Journal of Cultural Property HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Different Materialities – Different Authenticities? Considerations on Watercraft Exhibited in Museums Learning and Knowledge Loss: Returning Antiquities from Fordham University to Italy Are Archaeologists Talking About Looting? Reviewing Archaeological and Anthropological Conference Proceedings from 1899–2019 How to Be a ‘Good’ Collector: Some Ethical Reflections on the Private Collecting of Cultural Heritage T. rex is Fierce, T. rex is Charismatic, T. rex is Litigious: Disruptive Objects in Affective Desirescapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1