A Case-Control Study of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Biomarker of Inflammation in Adults with Epilepsy

B. Osalusi, LO Ogunjimi, A. Akinyinka, A. Aderinola, M. Olusola-Bello, D. Oboh
{"title":"A Case-Control Study of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Biomarker of Inflammation in Adults with Epilepsy","authors":"B. Osalusi, LO Ogunjimi, A. Akinyinka, A. Aderinola, M. Olusola-Bello, D. Oboh","doi":"10.30442/ahr.0902-04-197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is growing evidence that inflammation plays a specific role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy and seizures also induce inflammation. The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an emerging inflammatory biomarker of epilepsy.\nObjectives: To determine the association between epilepsy and Neutrophil /Lymphocyte Ratio among adults.\nMethods: Adults with epilepsies the attending outpatient neurology clinics at two Nigerian tertiary health facilities, were recruited. One hundred cases and one hundred age-matched, healthy controls were recruited. The total white blood cell (WBC) and its differential counts were extracted from Full Blood Count (FBC) results and NLR was calculated. The predictors of the association between WBC parameters and epilepsy were established using a linear regression model derived from WBC parameters associated with epilepsy.\nResults: Out of 100 cases and controls, there was no gender-related statistical difference between the cases and controls (p = 0.777). There was no difference between the mean ages of cases and control (p = 0.058). The total mean white blood cell count among the cases was 8.80±9.84×109 cells/L compared to was 6.30±1.90 ×109 cells/L in the controls, (p = 0.013). The mean neutrophil count in the cases was 59.00±17.89 ×109 cells/L compared to 49.50±15.44 ×109 cells/L among the controls (p < 0.001). The mean NLR for the cases was 4.24±10.44 compared to 1.84±2.26 in the controls (p = 0.026). The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (p = 0.013) and Basophil (p < 0.001) predicted epilepsy on linear regression analysis.\nConclusion: This study shows a clear difference in the TWBC and NLR with between adults with epilepsies and health controls.  ","PeriodicalId":52960,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30442/ahr.0902-04-197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence that inflammation plays a specific role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy and seizures also induce inflammation. The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an emerging inflammatory biomarker of epilepsy. Objectives: To determine the association between epilepsy and Neutrophil /Lymphocyte Ratio among adults. Methods: Adults with epilepsies the attending outpatient neurology clinics at two Nigerian tertiary health facilities, were recruited. One hundred cases and one hundred age-matched, healthy controls were recruited. The total white blood cell (WBC) and its differential counts were extracted from Full Blood Count (FBC) results and NLR was calculated. The predictors of the association between WBC parameters and epilepsy were established using a linear regression model derived from WBC parameters associated with epilepsy. Results: Out of 100 cases and controls, there was no gender-related statistical difference between the cases and controls (p = 0.777). There was no difference between the mean ages of cases and control (p = 0.058). The total mean white blood cell count among the cases was 8.80±9.84×109 cells/L compared to was 6.30±1.90 ×109 cells/L in the controls, (p = 0.013). The mean neutrophil count in the cases was 59.00±17.89 ×109 cells/L compared to 49.50±15.44 ×109 cells/L among the controls (p < 0.001). The mean NLR for the cases was 4.24±10.44 compared to 1.84±2.26 in the controls (p = 0.026). The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (p = 0.013) and Basophil (p < 0.001) predicted epilepsy on linear regression analysis. Conclusion: This study shows a clear difference in the TWBC and NLR with between adults with epilepsies and health controls.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率作为成人癫痫炎症生物标志物的病例对照研究
背景:越来越多的证据表明,炎症在癫痫的发病机制中起着特定的作用,癫痫发作也会引发炎症。中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR)是一种新兴的癫痫炎症生物标志物。目的:确定成人癫痫与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率之间的关系。方法:招募在尼日利亚两个三级卫生机构的神经科门诊就诊的癫痫患者。招募了100例病例和100名年龄匹配的健康对照。从全血计数(FBC)结果中提取总白细胞(WBC)及其差异计数,并计算NLR。WBC参数与癫痫之间相关性的预测因子是使用从与癫痫相关的WBC参数导出的线性回归模型建立的。结果:在100例患者和对照组中,病例和对照组之间没有性别相关的统计差异(p=0.777)。病例和对照的平均年龄之间没有差异(p=0.058)。病例中的总平均白细胞计数为8.80±9.84×109细胞/L,而对照组为6.30±1.90×109细胞/L,(p=0.013)。病例中的平均中性粒细胞计数为59.00±17.89×109个细胞/L,而对照组为49.50±15.44×109个单元/L(p<0.001)。病例的平均NLR为4.24±10.44,对照组为1.84±2.26(p=0.026)。中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(p=0.013)和嗜碱性粒细胞(p<001)在线性回归分析中预测癫痫。结论:本研究显示,成年癫痫患者和健康对照者的TWBC和NLR存在明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sonographic Correlations between Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion and Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Patients with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Ibadan, Nigeria Medication Adherence, Barriers to Adherence and Treatment Satisfaction with Antiretroviral Therapy Among Adolescents Living with HIV in Lagos, Nigeria Diabetes-Related-Distress and its Relationship with Glycaemic Control Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Attending a Specialty Clinic in Lagos, Nigeria Experiences of Professional Autonomy Among Critical Care Nurses in Kenya: A Qualitative Study Decision-to-Delivery Interval and Obstetric Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Sections in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1