Effect of Elective Inguinal Irradiation in Low Rectal Cancer with Anal Canal Invasion

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Hong Kong Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.12809/hkjr2217659
HS Wong, Wyl Choi, KT Yuen
{"title":"Effect of Elective Inguinal Irradiation in Low Rectal Cancer with Anal Canal Invasion","authors":"HS Wong, Wyl Choi, KT Yuen","doi":"10.12809/hkjr2217659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We investigated whether omitting elective inguinal irradiation during neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation/chemoradiation therapy is feasible for patients with low rectal cancer with anal canal invasion (ACI) and nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) at presentation. Methods: Ninety low rectal cancer patients with ACI who underwent neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation/ chemoradiation therapy with or without elective inguinal radiotherapy (RT) between 2011 and 2021 were recruited. None had palpable ILN. The failure pattern, ILN recurrence rate, survival data, and prognostic factors were analysed. Results: Among 81 patients omitting elective inguinal RT, the 3-year ILN failure rate was 4.9%. Meanwhile, there was no inguinal failure with elective RT. One case of isolated ILN failure was successfully salvaged by surgery. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, positive pathological lymph node(s) after neoadjuvant treatment predicted a worse locoregional recurrence-free survival (odds ratio [OR] = 9.066; p ≤ 0.001), distant metastasis recurrence-free survival (OR = 6.426; p = 0.002), and overall survival (OR = 11.750; p ≤ 0.001). Chemotherapy concurrent with RT was associated with better locoregional recurrence-free survival (OR = 33.338; p = 0.001) and overall survival (OR = 13.917; p = 0.006). Grade ≥3 acute and chronic toxicities occurred in 33.3% and 19.8%, respectively, of patients with elective inguinal irradiation, compared with 11.1% and 7.4%, respectively, in patients who did not receive it. Conclusion: Omission of elective inguinal irradiation resulted in a low inguinal failure rate and similar survival outcomes for low rectal cancer patients with ACI. Additionally, it might spare patients from unnecessary acute and chronic RT toxicities.","PeriodicalId":41549,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr2217659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated whether omitting elective inguinal irradiation during neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation/chemoradiation therapy is feasible for patients with low rectal cancer with anal canal invasion (ACI) and nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) at presentation. Methods: Ninety low rectal cancer patients with ACI who underwent neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation/ chemoradiation therapy with or without elective inguinal radiotherapy (RT) between 2011 and 2021 were recruited. None had palpable ILN. The failure pattern, ILN recurrence rate, survival data, and prognostic factors were analysed. Results: Among 81 patients omitting elective inguinal RT, the 3-year ILN failure rate was 4.9%. Meanwhile, there was no inguinal failure with elective RT. One case of isolated ILN failure was successfully salvaged by surgery. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, positive pathological lymph node(s) after neoadjuvant treatment predicted a worse locoregional recurrence-free survival (odds ratio [OR] = 9.066; p ≤ 0.001), distant metastasis recurrence-free survival (OR = 6.426; p = 0.002), and overall survival (OR = 11.750; p ≤ 0.001). Chemotherapy concurrent with RT was associated with better locoregional recurrence-free survival (OR = 33.338; p = 0.001) and overall survival (OR = 13.917; p = 0.006). Grade ≥3 acute and chronic toxicities occurred in 33.3% and 19.8%, respectively, of patients with elective inguinal irradiation, compared with 11.1% and 7.4%, respectively, in patients who did not receive it. Conclusion: Omission of elective inguinal irradiation resulted in a low inguinal failure rate and similar survival outcomes for low rectal cancer patients with ACI. Additionally, it might spare patients from unnecessary acute and chronic RT toxicities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
择期腹股沟照射治疗侵犯肛管低位直肠癌的效果
简介:我们研究了在新辅助或辅助放射/放化疗中,对于出现肛管侵犯(ACI)和腹股沟淋巴结不可触及(ILNs)的低位直肠癌患者,在新辅助或辅助放射/放化疗中省略选择性腹股沟放疗是否可行。方法:招募2011年至2021年期间接受新辅助或辅助放疗/放化疗(伴或不伴选择性腹股沟放疗(RT))的90例低位直肠癌ACI患者。没有明显的ILN。分析失败模式、ILN复发率、生存数据和预后因素。结果:81例选择性腹股沟放疗患者中,3年ILN失败率为4.9%。同时,没有腹股沟失败选择性rt。1例孤立性ILN失败成功抢救手术。在多变量Cox回归分析中,新辅助治疗后病理淋巴结阳性预示着更差的局部无复发生存(优势比[OR] = 9.066;p≤0.001),远处转移无复发生存率(OR = 6.426;p = 0.002),总生存期(OR = 11.750;P≤0.001)。化疗联合放疗与更好的局部无复发生存相关(OR = 33.338;p = 0.001)和总生存期(OR = 13.917;P = 0.006)。选择性腹股沟放疗患者发生≥3级急性和慢性毒性的比例分别为33.3%和19.8%,而未接受放疗的患者分别为11.1%和7.4%。结论:对于低位直肠癌合并ACI患者,省略选择性腹股沟放射治疗导致了较低的腹股沟失败率和相似的生存结果。此外,它可能使患者免于不必要的急性和慢性RT毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Optimising Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening in Hong Kong Effects of Different Liver Diseases on Metabolic Reference in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Breast Ductography: A Hidden Diagnostic Gem for Patients with Abnormal Nipple Discharge Sporadic Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation with a History of Stroke/Cerebrovascular Ischaemia Successfully Treated with Coil Embolisation: Two Case Reports Kaposi Sarcoma of the Ankle Complicated by Emphysematous Osteomyelitis: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1