Spaces of engagement – critical aesthetic practice, audience experience and the documentary-like work

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Studies in Documentary Film Pub Date : 2020-12-07 DOI:10.1080/17503280.2020.1854071
B. Frankham
{"title":"Spaces of engagement – critical aesthetic practice, audience experience and the documentary-like work","authors":"B. Frankham","doi":"10.1080/17503280.2020.1854071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aesthetic choices and the experiences they create are fundamental to how documentary works establish their credentials and address their audiences.This paper focuses on the overlap between documentary and video art practice to explore the rhetorical possibilities of aesthetic experience. Applying a critical aesthetic practice, evident within artistic contexts, has the potential to encourage greater diversity in the stories that are told in documentaries, how they are told and how they might be heard. Through examination of the two-channel video installation, Disorient by Fiona Tan, the paper analyses how aesthetic choices operate as elements of a rhetorical strategy where the work is realised as an experience in itself, existing in the space of encounter between art object and spectator. I argue that the critical aesthetic practice evident in Disorient produces a circumstance where the audience encounters the rhetorical moves as much through the direct experience of the work as they do through puzzling over the indexical references that Tan raises and combines. As a two-channel video projection that is at a one-step remove from the form of cinematic documentary, Disorient is instructive in what may be possible when these strategies are applied to an artistically inclined, expanded documentary practice.","PeriodicalId":43545,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Documentary Film","volume":"16 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17503280.2020.1854071","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Documentary Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2020.1854071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aesthetic choices and the experiences they create are fundamental to how documentary works establish their credentials and address their audiences.This paper focuses on the overlap between documentary and video art practice to explore the rhetorical possibilities of aesthetic experience. Applying a critical aesthetic practice, evident within artistic contexts, has the potential to encourage greater diversity in the stories that are told in documentaries, how they are told and how they might be heard. Through examination of the two-channel video installation, Disorient by Fiona Tan, the paper analyses how aesthetic choices operate as elements of a rhetorical strategy where the work is realised as an experience in itself, existing in the space of encounter between art object and spectator. I argue that the critical aesthetic practice evident in Disorient produces a circumstance where the audience encounters the rhetorical moves as much through the direct experience of the work as they do through puzzling over the indexical references that Tan raises and combines. As a two-channel video projection that is at a one-step remove from the form of cinematic documentary, Disorient is instructive in what may be possible when these strategies are applied to an artistically inclined, expanded documentary practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与的空间——批判性审美实践、观众体验和纪实作品
审美选择和他们创造的体验是纪录片作品如何建立他们的凭据和解决他们的观众的基础。本文以纪录片与影像艺术实践的重叠为中心,探讨审美体验的修辞可能性。运用批判性的审美实践,在艺术语境中是很明显的,有可能鼓励纪录片中讲述的故事的更大多样性,以及它们的讲述方式和可能被听到的方式。本文通过对Fiona Tan的双通道视频装置作品《迷失方向》(Disorient)的考察,分析了审美选择如何作为一种修辞策略的元素,在这种修辞策略中,作品本身被实现为一种体验,存在于艺术品与观众之间的相遇空间中。我认为,在《迷失方向》中明显的批判性美学实践产生了一种情况,即观众通过直接体验作品而遇到修辞动作,就像他们通过对谭提出和组合的索引参考感到困惑一样。作为一种与电影纪录片形式仅一步之遥的双通道视频投影,《迷失方向》在将这些策略应用于具有艺术倾向的、扩展的纪录片实践时可能产生的可能性方面具有启发性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Documentary Film
Studies in Documentary Film FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Documentary Film is the first refereed scholarly journal devoted to the history, theory, criticism and practice of documentary film. In recent years we have witnessed an increased visibility for documentary film through conferences, the success of general theatrical releases and the re-emergence of scholarship in documentary film studies. Studies in Documentary Film is a peer-reviewed journal.
期刊最新文献
‘And then … ’: new media’s conspiracy theories and counternarratives in Loose Change and The Power of Nightmares South Korean Documentary Cinema and remembrance: the past in the present, at Jeonju Film Festival 2024 The image of the absent narrators: personal migrant memories in Žilnik’s docu-experiments Exploring the empathic potential of 360-degree documentary The cinema of Rithy Panh: everything has a soul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1