Rhizosphere and root community analysis of oomycetes associated with poor alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seedling establishment

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Phytobiomes Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI:10.1094/pbiomes-02-23-0005-r
Leta Larsen, D. Schlatter, Jason Nimpoeno, Carla Hines-Snider, D. Samac
{"title":"Rhizosphere and root community analysis of oomycetes associated with poor alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seedling establishment","authors":"Leta Larsen, D. Schlatter, Jason Nimpoeno, Carla Hines-Snider, D. Samac","doi":"10.1094/pbiomes-02-23-0005-r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seeds planted in cold, wet soil are prone to seed rot, pre- and post-emergence damping-off, and seedling root rot. These diseases reduce initial stand density and impact forage yields and winter survival when root systems are stunted by infection. Successful management depends on identifying the causal agents, but isolation in pure culture is time consuming and may fail to recover slow growing organisms or those requiring special growth conditions. Here, the oomycetes in rhizosphere soil and root endospheres from eight locations with a history of poor alfalfa establishment were identified by amplicon sequence analysis. Seedling bioassays were done with bulk soil and quantitative PCR assays were done using DNA from bulk soil, rhizosphere soil, and the root endosphere for Aphanomyces euteiches, Phytophthora medicaginis, Pythium irregulare, P. sylvaticum, and P. ultimum var. ultimum. In the endosphere and rhizosphere, A. euteiches was the dominant taxon, followed by Phytophthora medicaginis and P. sansomeana, a broad host range pathogen not previously known to infect alfalfa. Pythium inflatum and Globisporangium perplexum were also significantly over-represented in roots at five of the eight locations, indicating that these taxa are commonly enriched in alfalfa roots, but had not previously been identified as alfalfa pathogens. The qPCR assays of bulk soil showed that A. euteiches and P. medicaginis were unevenly distributed in the plots and low concentrations of the pathogens led to high levels of root rot disease. These results support development of cultivars with high levels of resistance to the most common oomycete pathogens.","PeriodicalId":48504,"journal":{"name":"Phytobiomes Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytobiomes Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/pbiomes-02-23-0005-r","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seeds planted in cold, wet soil are prone to seed rot, pre- and post-emergence damping-off, and seedling root rot. These diseases reduce initial stand density and impact forage yields and winter survival when root systems are stunted by infection. Successful management depends on identifying the causal agents, but isolation in pure culture is time consuming and may fail to recover slow growing organisms or those requiring special growth conditions. Here, the oomycetes in rhizosphere soil and root endospheres from eight locations with a history of poor alfalfa establishment were identified by amplicon sequence analysis. Seedling bioassays were done with bulk soil and quantitative PCR assays were done using DNA from bulk soil, rhizosphere soil, and the root endosphere for Aphanomyces euteiches, Phytophthora medicaginis, Pythium irregulare, P. sylvaticum, and P. ultimum var. ultimum. In the endosphere and rhizosphere, A. euteiches was the dominant taxon, followed by Phytophthora medicaginis and P. sansomeana, a broad host range pathogen not previously known to infect alfalfa. Pythium inflatum and Globisporangium perplexum were also significantly over-represented in roots at five of the eight locations, indicating that these taxa are commonly enriched in alfalfa roots, but had not previously been identified as alfalfa pathogens. The qPCR assays of bulk soil showed that A. euteiches and P. medicaginis were unevenly distributed in the plots and low concentrations of the pathogens led to high levels of root rot disease. These results support development of cultivars with high levels of resistance to the most common oomycete pathogens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)育苗不良相关卵菌根际及根群落分析
在寒冷潮湿的土壤中种植的苜蓿种子容易发生种子腐烂、羽化前后枯萎和幼苗根系腐烂。当根系受到感染而发育不良时,这些疾病会降低初始林分密度,影响牧草产量和冬季生存。成功的管理取决于确定病因,但在纯培养中分离是耗时的,可能无法恢复生长缓慢的生物体或需要特殊生长条件的生物体。在这里,通过扩增子序列分析鉴定了来自八个有不良苜蓿建立历史的地方的根际土壤和根内球中的卵菌。用大量土壤进行幼苗生物测定,并用来自大量土壤、根际土壤和根内层的DNA进行定量PCR测定。在内层和根际,A.euteiches是主要的分类单元,其次是Phytophthora medaginis和P.sansomeana,这是一种以前不知道会感染苜蓿的广泛宿主病原体。在八个位置中的五个位置,膨胀腐霉和困惑球孢在根中的代表性也明显过高,这表明这些分类群通常在苜蓿根中富集,但以前尚未被鉴定为苜蓿病原体。大量土壤的qPCR分析表明,A.euteiches和P.medaginis在地块中分布不均,低浓度的病原体导致高水平的根腐病。这些结果支持培育对最常见的卵菌病原体具有高水平抗性的品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genetically similar Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni strains and associated phage display phenotypic and genotypic variation across 35 years Abiotic stress reorganizes rhizosphere and endosphere network structure of Sorghum bicolor A Specific Resistance Gene to Leptosphaeria maculans, Rlm11, Has a Limited Impact on Brassica napus Mycobiota Compared with Plant Compartment or Cropping Season Effects Fungal communities shift with soybean cyst nematode abundance in soils The root-endophytic microbiome shifts under drought in high-performing sorghum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1