Unburnable Fossil Fuels and Climate Finance: Compensation for Rights Holders

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Global Environmental Politics Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1162/glep_a_00688
Martí Orta-Martínez, L. Pellegrini, M. Arsel, C. Mena, G. Muñoa
{"title":"Unburnable Fossil Fuels and Climate Finance: Compensation for Rights Holders","authors":"Martí Orta-Martínez, L. Pellegrini, M. Arsel, C. Mena, G. Muñoa","doi":"10.1162/glep_a_00688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To limit the increase in global mean temperature to 1.5°C, CO2 emissions should be capped at 440 gigatons. To achieve this, about 89 percent, 59 percent, and 58 percent of existing coal and conventional gas and oil reserves, respectively, need to remain unburned. This implies an economic cost for fossil fuel rights owners, and any successful climate policy will rely on resolving the distributional challenge of how to allocate the right to use the remaining burnable reserves. We discuss the possibility of compensating rights holders of unburnable oil and gas reserves, producing the first estimates of the financial resources needed to secure full compensation. We estimate that approximately US$ 5,400 billion (109) would be needed. Despite the vast amounts required, compensation is nevertheless economically feasible. We suggest a Keynesian “whatever it takes” approach for climate action, combining partial compensation for unburnable fuels and investment in low-carbon technologies to drastically reduce emissions in the rapidly closing window of opportunity before 2030.","PeriodicalId":47774,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Politics","volume":"22 1","pages":"15-27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract To limit the increase in global mean temperature to 1.5°C, CO2 emissions should be capped at 440 gigatons. To achieve this, about 89 percent, 59 percent, and 58 percent of existing coal and conventional gas and oil reserves, respectively, need to remain unburned. This implies an economic cost for fossil fuel rights owners, and any successful climate policy will rely on resolving the distributional challenge of how to allocate the right to use the remaining burnable reserves. We discuss the possibility of compensating rights holders of unburnable oil and gas reserves, producing the first estimates of the financial resources needed to secure full compensation. We estimate that approximately US$ 5,400 billion (109) would be needed. Despite the vast amounts required, compensation is nevertheless economically feasible. We suggest a Keynesian “whatever it takes” approach for climate action, combining partial compensation for unburnable fuels and investment in low-carbon technologies to drastically reduce emissions in the rapidly closing window of opportunity before 2030.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不可燃烧的化石燃料与气候融资:对权利持有人的补偿
摘要为了将全球平均气温的上升限制在1.5°C,二氧化碳排放量应限制在440亿吨。为了实现这一目标,分别约89%、59%和58%的现有煤炭、常规天然气和石油储量需要保持未燃烧状态。这意味着化石燃料权利所有者要付出经济成本,任何成功的气候政策都将取决于解决如何分配剩余可燃烧储量使用权的分配挑战。我们讨论了赔偿未燃石油和天然气储量权利持有人的可能性,对确保全额赔偿所需的财政资源进行了初步估计。我们估计大约需要54000亿美元(109)。尽管所需数额巨大,但赔偿在经济上是可行的。我们建议采取凯恩斯主义的“不惜一切代价”的气候行动方法,将对不燃燃料的部分补偿和对低碳技术的投资结合起来,在2030年之前迅速关闭的机会窗口大幅减少排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Politics examines the relationship between global political forces and environmental change, with particular attention given to the implications of local-global interactions for environmental management as well as the implications of environmental change for world politics. Each issue is divided into research articles and a shorter forum articles focusing on issues such as the role of states, multilateral institutions and agreements, trade, international finance, corporations, science and technology, and grassroots movements.
期刊最新文献
The Ecocentrists: A History of Radical Environmentalism by Keith Makoto Woodhouse The Role of Translation in Enacting Multiscalar Climate Action: Insights from European Christian Faith-Based Actors All Hands on Deck: Solutions-Based Pedagogies for Global Environmental Politics African Ecomedia: Network Forms, Planetary Politics by Cajetan Iheka Realpolitik in the Anthropocene: Resilience, Neoclassical Realism, and the Paris Agreement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1