The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy in the management of pulmonary metastases: a systematic review

Q4 Medicine Precision Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1002/pro6.1148
Yung Lee, Y. Samarasinghe, Nadeesha Samarasinghe, Janhavi Patel, T. McKechnie, C. Finley, W. Hanna, A. Swaminath, J. Agzarian
{"title":"The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy in the management of pulmonary metastases: a systematic review","authors":"Yung Lee, Y. Samarasinghe, Nadeesha Samarasinghe, Janhavi Patel, T. McKechnie, C. Finley, W. Hanna, A. Swaminath, J. Agzarian","doi":"10.1002/pro6.1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While pulmonary metastases are often managed through metastasectomies, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a relatively novel treatment that has shown promise for this disease. This review aimed to summarize the current findings of SBRT in the treatment of pulmonary metastases. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for articles that examined the use of SBRT for patients with pulmonary metastases. Primary outcomes included overall survival, disease‐free survival, and progression‐free survival. Results were pooled where appropriate. Risk of bias was assessed through the Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies tool. After screening, 13 studies with 545 patients conducted between 2006 and 2020 were included in this review. Primary tumor localizations included gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and bone, among others. Pooled overall survival at 1 year was 81%, 41% at 3 years, 34% at 4 years, and 26% at 5 years. Pooled progression‐free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 60%, 41%, and 31% respectively. Local control at 1, 2, and 3 years were 90%, 79%, and 77%, respectively. Preliminary evidence regarding SBRT for treatment of pulmonary metastases shows promising benefits for overall survival and local control. Further high‐quality prospective trials are required to investigate the effectiveness and treatment‐related adverse effects of SBRT, and should compare it with metastasectomy.","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While pulmonary metastases are often managed through metastasectomies, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a relatively novel treatment that has shown promise for this disease. This review aimed to summarize the current findings of SBRT in the treatment of pulmonary metastases. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for articles that examined the use of SBRT for patients with pulmonary metastases. Primary outcomes included overall survival, disease‐free survival, and progression‐free survival. Results were pooled where appropriate. Risk of bias was assessed through the Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies tool. After screening, 13 studies with 545 patients conducted between 2006 and 2020 were included in this review. Primary tumor localizations included gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and bone, among others. Pooled overall survival at 1 year was 81%, 41% at 3 years, 34% at 4 years, and 26% at 5 years. Pooled progression‐free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 60%, 41%, and 31% respectively. Local control at 1, 2, and 3 years were 90%, 79%, and 77%, respectively. Preliminary evidence regarding SBRT for treatment of pulmonary metastases shows promising benefits for overall survival and local control. Further high‐quality prospective trials are required to investigate the effectiveness and treatment‐related adverse effects of SBRT, and should compare it with metastasectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向放射治疗在肺转移瘤治疗中的作用:系统综述
虽然肺转移瘤通常通过转移切除术进行治疗,但立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)是一种相对较新的治疗方法,已显示出对该疾病的治疗前景。本综述旨在总结SBRT治疗肺转移瘤的最新研究结果。MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL检索了检查SBRT用于肺转移患者的文章。主要结果包括总生存率、无疾病生存率和无进展生存率。结果在适当的地方汇总。通过非随机研究方法学指数工具评估偏倚风险。经过筛选,本综述包括2006年至2020年间对545名患者进行的13项研究。原发性肿瘤定位包括胃肠道、肺部和骨骼等。1年的总生存率为81%,3年为41%,4年为34%,5年为26%。1年、2年和3年的合并无进展生存率分别为60%、41%和31%。1年、2年和3年的局部控制率分别为90%、79%和77%。SBRT治疗肺转移瘤的初步证据显示,SBRT对整体生存率和局部控制有很好的益处。需要进一步的高质量前瞻性试验来调查SBRT的有效性和治疗相关的不良反应,并将其与转移切除术进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Radiation Oncology
Precision Radiation Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Sinonasal Teratocarcinosarcoma: A case report Stereotactic body radiotherapy takes on Lung Oligometastases: Latest breakthroughs Clinical outcomes of multisite moderate to high dose radiotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma Stereotactic radiotherapy: An educational narrative review Clinical application of high‐LET radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in malignant tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1