COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS TO CALCULATE EXTERNAL LOADS AT FLIGHT IN CONTINUOUS TURBULENCE

IF 0.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Aviation Pub Date : 2022-10-25 DOI:10.3846/aviation.2022.17788
B. Hevko, Yurij Bondar
{"title":"COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS TO CALCULATE EXTERNAL LOADS AT FLIGHT IN CONTINUOUS TURBULENCE","authors":"B. Hevko, Yurij Bondar","doi":"10.3846/aviation.2022.17788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The external loads from the continuous turbulence on the elastic high aspect ratio wing of the transport category aircraft are calculated by Dynamics of Turbulence Air (DTA) and Interactive Multidisciplinary Aircraft Design (IMAD) methods. The response to continuous turbulence was determined taking into account the requirements of CS-25.341(b). The model of the aircraft structure is directed by symmetrical spatial beam schematization. Determination of aerodynamic forces and moments was performed using the methods of linear computational aerodynamics: the panel method of Doublet-Lattice and Constant Pressures (DLM/CPM) and the method of circulation. Comparison of the results of load determination showed that, in general, the values of the loads calculated using IMAD are lower than the values calculated using DTA. Therefore, when designing an aircraft, it is advisable to combine these methods: calculate the loads using IMAD, as a more functional method, and then the loads obtained in the critical points of the calculated flight area should be confirmed using the DTA method. Thus, this study determined the difference between the results of the calculation of loads from the continuous turbulence on the elastic wing of the transport category aircraft using DTA and IMAD methods.","PeriodicalId":51910,"journal":{"name":"Aviation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2022.17788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The external loads from the continuous turbulence on the elastic high aspect ratio wing of the transport category aircraft are calculated by Dynamics of Turbulence Air (DTA) and Interactive Multidisciplinary Aircraft Design (IMAD) methods. The response to continuous turbulence was determined taking into account the requirements of CS-25.341(b). The model of the aircraft structure is directed by symmetrical spatial beam schematization. Determination of aerodynamic forces and moments was performed using the methods of linear computational aerodynamics: the panel method of Doublet-Lattice and Constant Pressures (DLM/CPM) and the method of circulation. Comparison of the results of load determination showed that, in general, the values of the loads calculated using IMAD are lower than the values calculated using DTA. Therefore, when designing an aircraft, it is advisable to combine these methods: calculate the loads using IMAD, as a more functional method, and then the loads obtained in the critical points of the calculated flight area should be confirmed using the DTA method. Thus, this study determined the difference between the results of the calculation of loads from the continuous turbulence on the elastic wing of the transport category aircraft using DTA and IMAD methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续乱流飞行中计算外载荷的两种方法的比较
采用湍流空气动力学(DTA)和交互式多学科飞机设计(IMAD)方法计算了运输类飞机弹性大展弦比机翼在连续湍流作用下的外载荷。考虑CS-25.341(b)的要求,确定了对连续湍流的响应。飞机结构的模型是由对称空间梁示意图指导的。采用线性计算空气动力学方法:双点阵恒压面板法(DLM/CPM)和循环法进行气动力和力矩的确定。负荷确定结果的比较表明,一般情况下,使用IMAD计算的负荷值低于使用DTA计算的负荷值。因此,在设计飞机时,建议将这两种方法结合起来:使用功能更强的IMAD方法计算载荷,然后使用DTA方法确定计算飞行区域临界点处的载荷。因此,本研究确定了使用DTA和IMAD方法计算运输类飞机弹性机翼连续湍流载荷结果的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aviation
Aviation ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING FIELDS OF RESEARCH: ▪ Flight Physics ▪ Air Traffic Management ▪ Aerostructures ▪ Airports ▪ Propulsion ▪ Human Factors ▪ Aircraft Avionics, Systems and Equipment ▪ Air Transport Technologies and Development ▪ Flight Mechanics ▪ History of Aviation ▪ Integrated Design and Validation (method and tools) Besides, it publishes: short reports and notes, reviews, reports about conferences and workshops
期刊最新文献
DETERMINATION OF LOADS IN THE ULTRALIGHT HELICOPTER BLADES RATIONAL CONTROL BY TEMPERATURE IN VORTEX ENERGY SEPARATOR UNDER DESTABILIZING EFFECTS CUSTOMER-FOCUSED AIRCRAFT SEAT DESIGN: A CASE STUDY WITH AHP-QFD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND HAZARDS IN THE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE INDUSTRY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION STUDY OF A PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURE IN THE RESCUE SYSTEMS OF SMALL AIRCRAFTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1