Determining the relationship between the slope and directional distribution of the UAV point cloud and the accuracy of various IDW interpolation

IF 3.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI:10.26833/ijeg.940997
K. Hastaoglu, Sinan Göğsu, Y. Gül
{"title":"Determining the relationship between the slope and directional distribution of the UAV point cloud and the accuracy of various IDW interpolation","authors":"K. Hastaoglu, Sinan Göğsu, Y. Gül","doi":"10.26833/ijeg.940997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) based interpolation method is also widely used in earth science studies. In the classical IDW method, the directional distribution of the reference points around the point to be estimated within the critical circle and the slope differences are not taken into consideration. On the other hand, in the IDW-based method developed by Shepard, the ratio of the distances of the reference points within the critical circle to the critical circle radius (r), the anisotropy and the slope differences are taken into consideration. In this study, the results of the classical IDW method and Shepard method were compared to increase the accuracy of interpolation produced from UAV data. A software has been developed to make these comparisons in more detail. The classical IDW and Shepard based interpolation methods used in this software takes into consideration the anisotropy, the slope differences and the ratio of the distances to the critical circle radius. In this study, UAV flights were performed in three different study areas with different topographic features and 3D point cloud data were obtained in order to make detailed analyzes. Using developed software, data from three different study areas have been tested and the results from different Shepard interpolation models have been discussed. The major contribution of this paper is in evaluation of various IDW options when applied to UAV point data. As a result, especially in geodetic studies form UAV data, it was observed that the results improved with 11% to 37% by using the Shepard method with the suitable power parameter value considering the directional distribution of the reference points in the critical circle and the slope differences.","PeriodicalId":42633,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.940997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) based interpolation method is also widely used in earth science studies. In the classical IDW method, the directional distribution of the reference points around the point to be estimated within the critical circle and the slope differences are not taken into consideration. On the other hand, in the IDW-based method developed by Shepard, the ratio of the distances of the reference points within the critical circle to the critical circle radius (r), the anisotropy and the slope differences are taken into consideration. In this study, the results of the classical IDW method and Shepard method were compared to increase the accuracy of interpolation produced from UAV data. A software has been developed to make these comparisons in more detail. The classical IDW and Shepard based interpolation methods used in this software takes into consideration the anisotropy, the slope differences and the ratio of the distances to the critical circle radius. In this study, UAV flights were performed in three different study areas with different topographic features and 3D point cloud data were obtained in order to make detailed analyzes. Using developed software, data from three different study areas have been tested and the results from different Shepard interpolation models have been discussed. The major contribution of this paper is in evaluation of various IDW options when applied to UAV point data. As a result, especially in geodetic studies form UAV data, it was observed that the results improved with 11% to 37% by using the Shepard method with the suitable power parameter value considering the directional distribution of the reference points in the critical circle and the slope differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定无人机点云的斜率和方向分布与各种IDW插值精度之间的关系
基于逆距离加权(IDW)的插值方法在地球科学研究中也得到了广泛的应用。在经典IDW方法中,没有考虑临界圆内待估计点周围参考点的方向分布和斜率差。另一方面,在Shepard开发的基于IDW的方法中,考虑了临界圆内参考点的距离与临界圆半径的比率(r)、各向异性和斜率差异。在本研究中,将经典IDW方法和Shepard方法的结果进行了比较,以提高无人机数据插值的精度。已经开发了一个软件来更详细地进行这些比较。该软件中使用的基于IDW和Shepard的经典插值方法考虑了各向异性、斜率差以及距离与临界圆半径的比值。在本研究中,无人机在具有不同地形特征的三个不同研究区域进行了飞行,并获得了三维点云数据,以便进行详细分析。使用开发的软件,对来自三个不同研究领域的数据进行了测试,并讨论了不同Shepard插值模型的结果。本文的主要贡献是对应用于无人机点数据的各种IDW选项进行评估。因此,特别是在无人机数据的大地测量研究中,观察到,考虑到参考点在临界圆中的方向分布和斜率差异,使用具有适当功率参数值的Shepard方法,结果改进了11%至37%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
A benchmark dataset for deep learning-based airplane detection: HRPlanes Methodology of real-time 3D point cloud mapping with UAV lidar Proliferation of Dichotomy Urban Settlements Plight: Land Governance And Sustainable Built Environment In Tanzania Spatio-Temporal monitoring of Qeshm mangrove forests through machine learning classification of SAR and Optical images on Google Earth Engine Transformation from e-Government to e-land administration in Turkey: A SWOT-based assessment analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1