Measuring research efficiency and its determining factors for Indonesian R&D institutions: does scientific publication make a difference?

Finik Mutia Afriana, Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik
{"title":"Measuring research efficiency and its determining factors for Indonesian R&D institutions: does scientific publication make a difference?","authors":"Finik Mutia Afriana, Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-04-2022-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe outcomes of public research institutions (PRIs), also known as research and development (R&D) institutions, in developing countries, including Indonesia, are still dubious. This study aims to measure the efficiency of R&D institutions using the case of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences, with and without an assessment of the role of scientific publication.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA panel data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is used to estimate the research efficiency of Indonesian R&D institutions during the period 2016–2019 based on the relationship between intellectual property (IP), research budgets and number of active researchers. The Tobit model is subsequently applied to analyze the factors that affect efficiency.\n\n\nFindings\nThe DEA analysis shows an average efficiency value of 0.361, implying that 42% of the decision-making units (DMUs) have above-average efficiency scores. When scientific publication is added as an output variable, the efficiency increases to an average of 0.545, resulting in 53% of the DMUs with above-average efficiency.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe main implication is that scientific publications can increase the output of R&D institutions in Indonesia. This study recommends strengthening the research group establishment led by research professors along with setting acceptable high output targets. Researcher competence must be improved together with support for research collaboration among the different fields of science. Scientific publications should be considered part of IP measurement along with the type of mandate of each PRI.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study offers a method of evaluation of research efficiency that can be applied to institutions outside Indonesia, thus furthering the dialogue on science and technology policy management.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper contributes to the literature by using a new and comprehensive method to measure research output – that of IP measurement, including new scientific publication. The implications provide action points for the governments to support R&D institutions and for research practitioners to augment research output.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-04-2022-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The outcomes of public research institutions (PRIs), also known as research and development (R&D) institutions, in developing countries, including Indonesia, are still dubious. This study aims to measure the efficiency of R&D institutions using the case of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences, with and without an assessment of the role of scientific publication. Design/methodology/approach A panel data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is used to estimate the research efficiency of Indonesian R&D institutions during the period 2016–2019 based on the relationship between intellectual property (IP), research budgets and number of active researchers. The Tobit model is subsequently applied to analyze the factors that affect efficiency. Findings The DEA analysis shows an average efficiency value of 0.361, implying that 42% of the decision-making units (DMUs) have above-average efficiency scores. When scientific publication is added as an output variable, the efficiency increases to an average of 0.545, resulting in 53% of the DMUs with above-average efficiency. Research limitations/implications The main implication is that scientific publications can increase the output of R&D institutions in Indonesia. This study recommends strengthening the research group establishment led by research professors along with setting acceptable high output targets. Researcher competence must be improved together with support for research collaboration among the different fields of science. Scientific publications should be considered part of IP measurement along with the type of mandate of each PRI. Practical implications This study offers a method of evaluation of research efficiency that can be applied to institutions outside Indonesia, thus furthering the dialogue on science and technology policy management. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature by using a new and comprehensive method to measure research output – that of IP measurement, including new scientific publication. The implications provide action points for the governments to support R&D institutions and for research practitioners to augment research output.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量印尼研发机构的研究效率及其决定因素:科学出版物有影响吗?
目的包括印度尼西亚在内的发展中国家的公共研究机构(PRIs),也称为研发机构,其结果仍然令人怀疑。本研究旨在以印度尼西亚科学研究所为例,在评估和不评估科学出版物作用的情况下,衡量研发机构的效率。设计/方法论/方法基于知识产权(IP)、研究预算和活跃研究人员数量之间的关系,使用面板数据包络分析(DEA)模型来估计2016-2019年期间印尼研发机构的研究效率。随后应用Tobit模型来分析影响效率的因素。结果DEA分析显示平均效率值为0.361,这意味着42%的决策单元(DMU)的效率得分高于平均水平。当添加科学出版物作为输出变量时,效率平均提高到0.545,导致53%的DMU具有高于平均水平的效率。研究局限性/含义主要含义是科学出版物可以增加印尼研发机构的产出。这项研究建议加强由研究教授领导的研究小组的建立,同时设定可接受的高产出目标。必须提高研究人员的能力,同时支持不同科学领域之间的研究合作。科学出版物应与每个PRI的任务类型一起被视为IP测量的一部分。实际意义本研究提供了一种评估研究效率的方法,可应用于印度尼西亚以外的机构,从而促进关于科学和技术政策管理的对话。原创性/价值本文通过使用一种新的综合方法来衡量研究成果——知识产权测量方法,包括新的科学出版物,为文献做出了贡献。这些影响为政府支持研发机构和研究从业者增加研究产出提供了行动要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Editorial: “Digital transformation, innovation and competitiveness: some insights from Asia” Mathematical optimization of the sustainable gasoline supply chain: systematic literature review Exploring prospects of blockchain and fintech: using SLR approach Factors affecting the adoption of mobile payment services during the COVID-19 pandemic: an application of extended UTAUT2 model Developing entrepreneurship skills in scientific academia: best practices from India and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1