Do Exercise, Physical Activity, Dietetic, or Combined Interventions Improve Body Weight in New Kidney Transplant Recipients? A Narrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

E. Castle, E. McBride, J. Greenwood, K. Bramham, J. Chilcot, S. Greenwood
{"title":"Do Exercise, Physical Activity, Dietetic, or Combined Interventions Improve Body Weight in New Kidney Transplant Recipients? A Narrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"E. Castle, E. McBride, J. Greenwood, K. Bramham, J. Chilcot, S. Greenwood","doi":"10.3390/kidneydial1020014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weight gain within the first year of kidney transplantation is associated with adverse outcomes. This narrative systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effect of exercise, physical activity, dietary, and/or combined interventions on body weight and body mass index (BMI) within the first year of kidney transplantation. Seven databases were searched from January 1985 to April 2021 (Prospero ID: CRD42019140865), using a ‘Population, Intervention, Controls, Outcome’ (PICO) framework. The risk-of-bias was assessed by two reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included post-intervention body weight or BMI values. Of the 1197 articles screened, sixteen met the search criteria. Ten were RCTs, and six were quasi-experimental studies, including a total of 1821 new kidney transplant recipients. The sample sizes ranged from 8 to 452. Interventions (duration and type) were variable. Random-effects meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in post-intervention body weight (−2.5 kg, 95% CI −5.22 to 0.22) or BMI (−0.4 kg/m2, 95% CI −1.33 to 0.54). Despite methodological variance, statistical heterogeneity was not significant. Sensitivity analysis suggests combined interventions warrant further investigation. Five RCTs were classified as ‘high-risk’, one as ‘some-concerns’, and four as ‘low-risk’ for bias. We did not find evidence that dietary, exercise, or combined interventions led to significant changes in body weight or BMI post kidney transplantation. The number and quality of intervention studies are low. Higher quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the immediate and longer-term effects of combined interventions on body weight in new kidney transplant recipients.","PeriodicalId":74038,"journal":{"name":"Kidney and dialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney and dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial1020014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Weight gain within the first year of kidney transplantation is associated with adverse outcomes. This narrative systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effect of exercise, physical activity, dietary, and/or combined interventions on body weight and body mass index (BMI) within the first year of kidney transplantation. Seven databases were searched from January 1985 to April 2021 (Prospero ID: CRD42019140865), using a ‘Population, Intervention, Controls, Outcome’ (PICO) framework. The risk-of-bias was assessed by two reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included post-intervention body weight or BMI values. Of the 1197 articles screened, sixteen met the search criteria. Ten were RCTs, and six were quasi-experimental studies, including a total of 1821 new kidney transplant recipients. The sample sizes ranged from 8 to 452. Interventions (duration and type) were variable. Random-effects meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in post-intervention body weight (−2.5 kg, 95% CI −5.22 to 0.22) or BMI (−0.4 kg/m2, 95% CI −1.33 to 0.54). Despite methodological variance, statistical heterogeneity was not significant. Sensitivity analysis suggests combined interventions warrant further investigation. Five RCTs were classified as ‘high-risk’, one as ‘some-concerns’, and four as ‘low-risk’ for bias. We did not find evidence that dietary, exercise, or combined interventions led to significant changes in body weight or BMI post kidney transplantation. The number and quality of intervention studies are low. Higher quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the immediate and longer-term effects of combined interventions on body weight in new kidney transplant recipients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动、体育活动、饮食或联合干预能改善新肾移植受者的体重吗?叙事系统综述与元分析
肾移植第一年内的体重增加与不良后果有关。这篇叙述性系统综述和荟萃分析研究了肾移植第一年内运动、体育活动、饮食和/或联合干预对体重和体重指数(BMI)的影响。从1985年1月到2021年4月,使用“人口、干预、控制、结果”(PICO)框架搜索了七个数据库(Prospero ID:CRD42019140865)。两名评审员对偏倚风险进行了评估。对随机对照试验(RCT)进行随机效应荟萃分析,包括干预后的体重或BMI值。在筛选的1197篇文章中,有16篇符合搜索标准。10项为随机对照试验,6项为准实验研究,包括1821名新的肾移植受者。样本量从8到452个不等。干预措施(持续时间和类型)各不相同。随机效应荟萃分析显示,干预后体重(-2.5 kg,95%CI−5.22至0.22)或BMI(-0.4 kg/m2,95%CI–1.33至0.54)没有显著差异。尽管存在方法学差异,但统计异质性并不显著。敏感性分析表明,联合干预措施值得进一步调查。五项随机对照试验被归类为“高风险”,一项为“一些担忧”,四项为“低风险”偏倚。我们没有发现饮食、运动或联合干预导致肾移植后体重或BMI显著变化的证据。干预研究的数量和质量都很低。需要更高质量的随机对照试验来评估联合干预对新肾移植受者体重的即时和长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Two Levels of Podocyte Dysfunctions Induced by Apolipoprotein L1 Risk Variants Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Children after Cardiopulmonary Bypass How Can We Improve the Appetite of Older Patients on Dialysis in Japan? Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: Current State and Future Directions An Update on Hypomagnesemia and Hypermagnesemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1