Kedudukan Akta Berhubungan dengan Pelaksanaan Jabatan dari Oknum Notaris yang Berijazah Palsu

Sophia Nur Diana, Mispansyah Mispansyah, Ahmad Syaufi
{"title":"Kedudukan Akta Berhubungan dengan Pelaksanaan Jabatan dari Oknum Notaris yang Berijazah Palsu","authors":"Sophia Nur Diana, Mispansyah Mispansyah, Ahmad Syaufi","doi":"10.32801/lamlaj.v5i2.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of the deed in relation to the implementation of the position of the notary person with a fake certificate, and to analyze the accountability of a notary person who has a fake certificate on a notary deed. This is normative legal research and is based on library research. This research was conducted by processing legal resources supported by concepts and theories to support solutions to the main problems being studied. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the position of a notary deed in this study is divided into two categories, namely: (a) the position of a notarial deed made by a person with a notarized certificate, whether the authentic deed still has an authentic deed position by considering the utility elements in law enforcement; and (b) the position of a notary deed made by a fake notarized certificate, is reduced to a notary deed because it does not meet the authentic deed requirements stipulated in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, i.e. the deed must be made by or in the presence of an authorized public official. The responsibility of the Notary for the use of fake Bachelor of Laws (Master of Notary Studies) is (a) criminal responsibility; (B) civil liability; (c) administrative responsibilities; and (d) responsibilities based on the Notary Code of Ethic.","PeriodicalId":31238,"journal":{"name":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"230-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v5i2.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of the deed in relation to the implementation of the position of the notary person with a fake certificate, and to analyze the accountability of a notary person who has a fake certificate on a notary deed. This is normative legal research and is based on library research. This research was conducted by processing legal resources supported by concepts and theories to support solutions to the main problems being studied. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the position of a notary deed in this study is divided into two categories, namely: (a) the position of a notarial deed made by a person with a notarized certificate, whether the authentic deed still has an authentic deed position by considering the utility elements in law enforcement; and (b) the position of a notary deed made by a fake notarized certificate, is reduced to a notary deed because it does not meet the authentic deed requirements stipulated in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, i.e. the deed must be made by or in the presence of an authorized public official. The responsibility of the Notary for the use of fake Bachelor of Laws (Master of Notary Studies) is (a) criminal responsibility; (B) civil liability; (c) administrative responsibilities; and (d) responsibilities based on the Notary Code of Ethic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的目的是分析契约的地位与持假证书的公证员地位的执行之间的关系,并分析持假证书的公证员在公证契约上的责任。这是规范性的法律研究,以图书馆研究为基础。本研究通过处理法律资源,以概念和理论为支撑,以支持所研究的主要问题的解决方案。从本研究的结果可以得出结论,本研究中公证契据的地位分为两类,即:(a)持有公证证书的人制作的公证契据的地位,考虑到执法中的效用因素,该公证契据是否仍具有真实的契据地位;(二)伪造公证书制作的公证证书,由于不符合《民法典》第1868条规定的公证证书的真实性要求,即公证证书必须由授权公职人员制作或在授权公职人员在场的情况下制作,而沦落为公证证书。公证员使用假法学学士(公证学硕士)的责任是:(a)刑事责任;(二)民事责任;(c)行政责任;(d)《公证员道德准则》所规定的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of the Crime of Burning Peatlands in Banjar Regency Company Loans in Procurement of Goods Services Government Corruption Perspectives Forced Marriage as an Unlawful Act in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis Legal Protection of Peer to Peer Lending Loans in Standard Agreements Based on Legal Assurance Theory Implementation of Sustainable Plantation Principles Through Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil in North Aceh Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1