Evaluación del uso de LiDAR discreto, full-waveform y TLS en la clasificación por composición de especies en bosques mediterráneos

IF 0.4 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Revista de Teledeteccion Pub Date : 2018-12-26 DOI:10.4995/RAET.2018.11106
J. Torralba, P. Crespo-Peremarch, L. A. Ruiz
{"title":"Evaluación del uso de LiDAR discreto, full-waveform y TLS en la clasificación por composición de especies en bosques mediterráneos","authors":"J. Torralba, P. Crespo-Peremarch, L. A. Ruiz","doi":"10.4995/RAET.2018.11106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LiDAR technology –airborne and terrestrial- is becoming more relevant in the development of forest inventories, which are crucial to better understand and manage forest ecosystems. In this study, we assessed a classification of species composition in a Mediterranean forest following the C4.5 decision tree. Different data sets from airborne laser scanner full-waveform (ALSFW), discrete (ALSD) and terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) were combined as input data for the classification. Species composition were divided into five classes: pure Quercus ilex plots (QUI); pure Pinus halepensis dense regenerated (HALr); pure P. halepensis (HAL); pure P. pinaster (PIN); and mixed P. pinaster and Q. suber (mPIN). Furthermore, the class HAL was subdivided in low and dense understory vegetation cover. As a result, combination of ALSFW and TLS reached 85.2% of overall accuracy classifying classes HAL, PIN and mPIN. Combining ALSFW and ALSD, the overall accuracy was 77.0% to discriminate among the five classes. Finally, classification of understory vegetation cover using ALSFW reached an overall accuracy of 90.9%. In general, combination of ALSFW and TLS improved the overall accuracy of classifying among HAL, PIN and mPIN by 7.4% compared to the use of the data sets separately, and by 33.3% with respect to the use of ALSD only. ALSFW metrics, in particular those specifically designed for detection of understory vegetation, increased the overall accuracy 9.1% with respect to ALSD metrics. These analyses show that classification in forest ecosystems with presence of understory vegetation and intermediate canopy strata is improved when ALSFW and/or TLS are used instead of ALSD.","PeriodicalId":43626,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Teledeteccion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Teledeteccion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/RAET.2018.11106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

LiDAR technology –airborne and terrestrial- is becoming more relevant in the development of forest inventories, which are crucial to better understand and manage forest ecosystems. In this study, we assessed a classification of species composition in a Mediterranean forest following the C4.5 decision tree. Different data sets from airborne laser scanner full-waveform (ALSFW), discrete (ALSD) and terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) were combined as input data for the classification. Species composition were divided into five classes: pure Quercus ilex plots (QUI); pure Pinus halepensis dense regenerated (HALr); pure P. halepensis (HAL); pure P. pinaster (PIN); and mixed P. pinaster and Q. suber (mPIN). Furthermore, the class HAL was subdivided in low and dense understory vegetation cover. As a result, combination of ALSFW and TLS reached 85.2% of overall accuracy classifying classes HAL, PIN and mPIN. Combining ALSFW and ALSD, the overall accuracy was 77.0% to discriminate among the five classes. Finally, classification of understory vegetation cover using ALSFW reached an overall accuracy of 90.9%. In general, combination of ALSFW and TLS improved the overall accuracy of classifying among HAL, PIN and mPIN by 7.4% compared to the use of the data sets separately, and by 33.3% with respect to the use of ALSD only. ALSFW metrics, in particular those specifically designed for detection of understory vegetation, increased the overall accuracy 9.1% with respect to ALSD metrics. These analyses show that classification in forest ecosystems with presence of understory vegetation and intermediate canopy strata is improved when ALSFW and/or TLS are used instead of ALSD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离散激光雷达、全波雷达和TLS在地中海森林物种组成分类中的应用评估
激光雷达技术——机载和陆地技术——在森林清查的发展中变得越来越重要,这对更好地了解和管理森林生态系统至关重要。在这项研究中,我们根据C4.5决策树评估了地中海森林的物种组成分类。将机载激光扫描仪全波形(ALSFW)、离散(ALSD)和地面激光扫描仪(TLS)的不同数据集作为输入数据进行分类。将物种组成分为五类:纯冬青栎样地(QUI);纯哈氏松致密再生(HALr);纯哈氏P.halepensis(HAL);纯P.pinaster(PIN);和P.pinaster和Q.suber(mPIN)混合。此外,HAL类还细分为低矮和茂密的林下植被覆盖。结果,ALSFW和TLS的组合达到了HAL、PIN和mPIN分类总准确率的85.2%。将ALSFW和ALSD相结合,在五个类别之间进行区分的总体准确率为77.0%。最后,使用ALSFW对林下植被覆盖进行分类的总体准确率达到90.9%。总体而言,与单独使用数据集相比,ALSFW和TLS组合将HAL、PIN和mPIN之间的分类总体准确率提高了7.4%,与仅使用ALSD相比提高了33.3%。ALSFW指标,特别是那些专门为检测林下植被而设计的指标,相对于ALSD指标,总体准确率提高了9.1%。这些分析表明,当使用ALSFW和/或TLS代替ALSD时,存在林下植被和中间冠层的森林生态系统的分类得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Teledeteccion
Revista de Teledeteccion REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clasificación de uso y cobertura del suelo a través de algoritmos de aprendizaje automático: revisión bibliográfica Mapeo semiautomático de áreas quemadas en Chimborazo-Ecuador utilizando medias compuestas de dNBR con umbrales ajustados Análisis espacio-temporal de florecimientos algales nocivos en un lago-cráter tropical usando datos MODIS (2003-2020) Estimación de biomasa y carbono con herramientas de teledetección en bosques secos tropicales del Tolima, Colombia Calibration of volumetric soil moisture using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery by Google Earth Engine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1