A Rasch analysis of the fear of coronavirus-19 scale in South Africa

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED SA Journal of Industrial Psychology Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1861
Sergio L. Peral, Brandon Morgan, Kleinjan Redelinghuys
{"title":"A Rasch analysis of the fear of coronavirus-19 scale in South Africa","authors":"Sergio L. Peral, Brandon Morgan, Kleinjan Redelinghuys","doi":"10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation Investigating the psychological aspects associated with the coronavirus disease might be important for psychological interventions. The fear of coronavirus-19 scale (FCV-19S) has emerged as a popular measure of coronavirus-19-related fear. However, its psychometric properties remain unknown in South Africa. Research purpose This study set out to investigate the internal validity of the FCV-19S in the South African context using the Rasch measurement model. Motivation for the study There have been some mixed findings on the psychometric properties of the FCV-19S in international research and its psychometric properties are yet to be investigated in South Africa. Investigating these psychometric properties can provide psychometric information to practitioners who wish to use this instrument in the South African context. Research approach/design and method A cross-sectional survey research design was used. The FCV-19S was administered to 159 adults. The Rasch partial credit model was applied to the item responses to investigate the measurement quality of the FCV-19S. Main findings The FCV-19S showed somewhat satisfactory internal validity in the South African context within the boundaries of the current sample, and clarity was obtained on the mixed findings obtained in the previous research. Potential shortcomings of the scale were identified that might reduce its applicability to the South African context. Practical/managerial implications Our results provide tentative support for the internal validity of the FCV-19S in South Africa. Suggestions for the improvement of the scale are made. Contribution/value-add This is one of the first studies to investigate the internal validity of the FCV-19S in South Africa. Our results hold important implications for the continued use of this scale and have helped to clarify some of the mixed findings obtained in previous research.","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Orientation Investigating the psychological aspects associated with the coronavirus disease might be important for psychological interventions. The fear of coronavirus-19 scale (FCV-19S) has emerged as a popular measure of coronavirus-19-related fear. However, its psychometric properties remain unknown in South Africa. Research purpose This study set out to investigate the internal validity of the FCV-19S in the South African context using the Rasch measurement model. Motivation for the study There have been some mixed findings on the psychometric properties of the FCV-19S in international research and its psychometric properties are yet to be investigated in South Africa. Investigating these psychometric properties can provide psychometric information to practitioners who wish to use this instrument in the South African context. Research approach/design and method A cross-sectional survey research design was used. The FCV-19S was administered to 159 adults. The Rasch partial credit model was applied to the item responses to investigate the measurement quality of the FCV-19S. Main findings The FCV-19S showed somewhat satisfactory internal validity in the South African context within the boundaries of the current sample, and clarity was obtained on the mixed findings obtained in the previous research. Potential shortcomings of the scale were identified that might reduce its applicability to the South African context. Practical/managerial implications Our results provide tentative support for the internal validity of the FCV-19S in South Africa. Suggestions for the improvement of the scale are made. Contribution/value-add This is one of the first studies to investigate the internal validity of the FCV-19S in South Africa. Our results hold important implications for the continued use of this scale and have helped to clarify some of the mixed findings obtained in previous research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉什分析了南非对冠状病毒19的恐惧程度
方向调查与冠状病毒疾病相关的心理方面可能对心理干预很重要。对冠状病毒肺炎的恐惧量表(FCV-19S)已成为衡量冠状病毒肺炎相关恐惧的一种流行指标。然而,它的心理测量特性在南非仍然未知。研究目的本研究旨在使用Rasch测量模型调查FCV-19S在南非背景下的内部有效性。这项研究的动机在国际研究中,关于FCV-19S的心理测量特性有一些喜忧参半的发现,而在南非,其心理测量特性尚待调查。调查这些心理测量特性可以为希望在南非使用该仪器的从业者提供心理测量信息。研究方法/设计和方法采用横断面调查研究设计。FCV-19S给药对象为159名成年人。将Rasch部分信用模型应用于项目响应,以研究FCV-19S的测量质量。主要发现FCV-19S在当前样本范围内的南非背景下显示出令人满意的内部有效性,并且在先前研究中获得的混合发现得到了澄清。已查明比额表的潜在缺点,这些缺点可能会降低其在南非的适用性。实际/管理意义我们的研究结果为FCV-19S在南非的内部有效性提供了初步支持。提出了改进规模的建议。贡献/增值这是南非最早调查FCV-19S内部有效性的研究之一。我们的研究结果对继续使用该量表具有重要意义,并有助于澄清先前研究中获得的一些混合发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Industrial and organisational psychology internship completion: Enabling and thwarting factors Transmogrification in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and beyond. Let that sink in The relationship between employee well-being and organisational effectiveness Exploring meaningful rewards for pharmaceutical employees during COVID-19 The organisational commitment of academic personnel during WFH within private higher education, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1