Ethical Codes for Early Childhood Teachers: How and Why Should We Use Them

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ECNU Review of Education Pub Date : 2022-09-25 DOI:10.1177/20965311221127322
Ruth Ingrid Skoglund, Juyan Ye (叶菊艳), Yong Jiang (姜勇)
{"title":"Ethical Codes for Early Childhood Teachers: How and Why Should We Use Them","authors":"Ruth Ingrid Skoglund, Juyan Ye (叶菊艳), Yong Jiang (姜勇)","doi":"10.1177/20965311221127322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around the world, early childhood teachers are recognized as playing a crucial role in improving children’s everyday lives and strengthening their learning abilities. Consequently, explicating the professional standards of educational practice is receiving growing attention from both stakeholders— including governments, educational authorities, and parents—and early childhood teachers themselves (Campbell-Barr &Bogatić, 2017; Chen et al., 2016; Havnes, 2018; Hordern, 2016; Oberhuemer, 2005). However, despite the long recognition of children’s education as an ethical task based on the values, motivation, and responsibility of teachers (Afdal & Afdal, 2019; Campbell, 2008; Chen et al., 2016; Forster, 2012; Webster & Whelen, 2019a), current discussions of standards for professional practice appear to neglect ethical aspects (Malone, 2020). Moreover, despite growing public interest in and expectations of the role of teachers in early childhood education and care (ECEC), the profession is still struggling to achieve professional status (Havnes, 2018, p. 659; Oberhuemer, 2005).","PeriodicalId":33103,"journal":{"name":"ECNU Review of Education","volume":"5 1","pages":"563 - 576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECNU Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221127322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around the world, early childhood teachers are recognized as playing a crucial role in improving children’s everyday lives and strengthening their learning abilities. Consequently, explicating the professional standards of educational practice is receiving growing attention from both stakeholders— including governments, educational authorities, and parents—and early childhood teachers themselves (Campbell-Barr &Bogatić, 2017; Chen et al., 2016; Havnes, 2018; Hordern, 2016; Oberhuemer, 2005). However, despite the long recognition of children’s education as an ethical task based on the values, motivation, and responsibility of teachers (Afdal & Afdal, 2019; Campbell, 2008; Chen et al., 2016; Forster, 2012; Webster & Whelen, 2019a), current discussions of standards for professional practice appear to neglect ethical aspects (Malone, 2020). Moreover, despite growing public interest in and expectations of the role of teachers in early childhood education and care (ECEC), the profession is still struggling to achieve professional status (Havnes, 2018, p. 659; Oberhuemer, 2005).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿教师的道德准则:我们如何以及为什么应该使用它们
在世界范围内,幼儿教师被认为在改善儿童的日常生活和加强他们的学习能力方面发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,阐明教育实践的专业标准正日益受到利益相关者(包括政府、教育当局和家长)和幼儿教师本身的关注(Campbell-Barr & bogatiki, 2017;Chen et al., 2016;没有,2018;Hordern, 2016;Oberhuemer, 2005)。然而,尽管长期以来人们都认为儿童教育是一项基于教师的价值观、动机和责任的伦理任务(Afdal & Afdal, 2019;坎贝尔,2008;Chen et al., 2016;福斯特,2012;韦伯斯特和惠伦,2019a),目前关于专业实践标准的讨论似乎忽视了道德方面(马龙,2020)。此外,尽管公众对教师在幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)中的作用的兴趣和期望越来越大,但该专业仍在努力实现专业地位(Havnes, 2018,第659页;Oberhuemer, 2005)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ECNU Review of Education
ECNU Review of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Educational Improvement Science: The Art of the Improving Organization Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Young Children: Redeveloping the Five Big Ideas Framework Extending the Comparisons of Shadow Education and Its Nexus With Schooling Toward a High-Quality System: A Critique of Chinese Special Education Policy Development and the Guidelines for the Evaluation of the Quality of Special Education Schools China's Policy Actions to Lead Teacher Development With Evaluation Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1