Operations in the upper echelons: leading sustainability through stewardship

IF 7.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.1108/ijopm-08-2021-0502
E. Bendoly, Daniel G. Bachrach, Terry L. Esper, Christian C. Blanco, J. Iversen, Yong Yin
{"title":"Operations in the upper echelons: leading sustainability through stewardship","authors":"E. Bendoly, Daniel G. Bachrach, Terry L. Esper, Christian C. Blanco, J. Iversen, Yong Yin","doi":"10.1108/ijopm-08-2021-0502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTop-level operations leaders can drive organizational performance across a broad range of pro-environmental objectives. The authors’ focus is on understanding which specific leadership competencies are most conducive to green performance outcomes. The authors further consider the influence of Lean thinking on the importance of these competencies.Design/methodology/approachIn study 1, of a multi-method investigation, the authors interview executive search professionals, on how green objectives impact top-level operations leadership searches. In study 2, the authors adopt a multi-attribute choice task to examine how Lean thinking impacts competency preferences. Finally, in study 3, the authors merge secondary data on corporate environmental performance with a survey of top-level operations managers’ assessments. This triangulating multi-method approach provides an integrated and holistic view into these dynamics.FindingsResults show particularly strong associations between resource and energy management outcomes and the specific leadership competencies of stewardship. This set of leadership competencies play the greatest role when Lean thinking is deficient.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the authors’ focus is on top-level operations managers, and their under-explored impact on environmental performance, such an impact represents only one dimension of corporate social responsibility (CSR) that these managers may be critically influencing.Practical implicationsThe associations uncovered in this research suggest critical leadership characteristics to consider in developing and recruiting top-level operations managers, when specific environmental objectives exist.Social implicationsThe study’s findings draw attention to the importance of leadership characteristics among influential corporate decision-makers, instrumental in the environmental progress of firms.Originality/valueThis work fills a critical gap in the authors’ understanding of how top-level operations managers influence green corporate objective, and how their contributions are valued across settings.","PeriodicalId":14234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-08-2021-0502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeTop-level operations leaders can drive organizational performance across a broad range of pro-environmental objectives. The authors’ focus is on understanding which specific leadership competencies are most conducive to green performance outcomes. The authors further consider the influence of Lean thinking on the importance of these competencies.Design/methodology/approachIn study 1, of a multi-method investigation, the authors interview executive search professionals, on how green objectives impact top-level operations leadership searches. In study 2, the authors adopt a multi-attribute choice task to examine how Lean thinking impacts competency preferences. Finally, in study 3, the authors merge secondary data on corporate environmental performance with a survey of top-level operations managers’ assessments. This triangulating multi-method approach provides an integrated and holistic view into these dynamics.FindingsResults show particularly strong associations between resource and energy management outcomes and the specific leadership competencies of stewardship. This set of leadership competencies play the greatest role when Lean thinking is deficient.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the authors’ focus is on top-level operations managers, and their under-explored impact on environmental performance, such an impact represents only one dimension of corporate social responsibility (CSR) that these managers may be critically influencing.Practical implicationsThe associations uncovered in this research suggest critical leadership characteristics to consider in developing and recruiting top-level operations managers, when specific environmental objectives exist.Social implicationsThe study’s findings draw attention to the importance of leadership characteristics among influential corporate decision-makers, instrumental in the environmental progress of firms.Originality/valueThis work fills a critical gap in the authors’ understanding of how top-level operations managers influence green corporate objective, and how their contributions are valued across settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高层管理:通过管理引领可持续发展
目的:高层运营领导者可以通过广泛的环保目标推动组织绩效。作者的重点是了解哪些具体的领导能力最有利于绿色绩效的结果。作者进一步考虑了精益思维对这些能力重要性的影响。设计/方法/途径在一项多方法调查的研究1中,作者就绿色目标如何影响顶级运营领导力搜索采访了高管猎头专业人士。在研究2中,作者采用多属性选择任务来考察精益思维如何影响胜任力偏好。最后,在研究3中,作者将关于企业环境绩效的二手数据与对顶级运营经理评估的调查合并在一起。这种多方法的三角测量方法提供了对这些动态的综合和整体的看法。研究结果表明,资源和能源管理成果与管理工作的具体领导能力之间存在着特别强烈的联系。当精益思维缺乏时,这套领导能力发挥了最大的作用。虽然作者的重点是高层运营经理,以及他们对环境绩效的未充分探讨的影响,但这种影响只代表了这些经理可能具有关键影响的企业社会责任(CSR)的一个方面。实际意义本研究发现的关联表明,当存在特定的环境目标时,在培养和招聘顶级运营经理时,需要考虑关键的领导特征。社会意义该研究的发现引起了人们对有影响力的企业决策者的领导特征的重要性的关注,这对企业的环境进步至关重要。原创性/价值这项工作填补了作者对高层运营经理如何影响绿色企业目标,以及他们的贡献如何在不同环境下被评估的理解上的一个关键空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
17.20%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The mission of the International Journal of Operations & Production Management (IJOPM) is to publish cutting-edge, innovative research with the potential to significantly advance the field of Operations and Supply Chain Management, both in theory and practice. Drawing on experiences from manufacturing and service sectors, in both private and public contexts, the journal has earned widespread respect in this complex and increasingly vital area of business management. Methodologically, IJOPM encompasses a broad spectrum of empirically-based inquiry using suitable research frameworks, as long as they offer generic insights of substantial value to operations and supply chain management. While the journal does not categorically exclude specific empirical methodologies, it does not accept purely mathematical modeling pieces. Regardless of the chosen mode of inquiry or methods employed, the key criteria are appropriateness of methodology, clarity in the study's execution, and rigor in the application of methods. It's important to note that any contribution should explicitly contribute to theory. The journal actively encourages the use of mixed methods where appropriate and valuable for generating research insights.
期刊最新文献
Is it good to have a choice? The value of participatory order assignments in warehousing The role of digital technologies in configuring circular ecosystems Beyond the new normal for sustainability: transformative operations and supply chain management for negative emissions Impact pathways: putting workers front and center in addressing workforce shortages in intellectual disability care The importance of performance measurement and management in sustainable supply chain governance among SMEs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1