Mouth breathing – A predictor for patient satisfaction after nasal septoplasty?

C. Bruehlmann, N. Buser, M. Soyka
{"title":"Mouth breathing – A predictor for patient satisfaction after nasal septoplasty?","authors":"C. Bruehlmann, N. Buser, M. Soyka","doi":"10.4193/rhinol/21.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: No reliable marker exists to predict septoplasty outcome. Most patients suffering from nasal airway obstruction (NAO) caused by a deviation of the nasal septum report a bothersome mouth breathing and dryness. In this study our aim was to assess, whether mouth breathing could be objectified in these patients and whether mouth breathing could predict septoplasty outcome. Methods: A monocentric, prospective case-control study of 21 patients was conducted. The proportion of mouth breathing was measured in a blinded manner. As a measurement of patient satisfaction, subjective symptoms pre- and postoperatively, were assessed by using VAS, NOSE and SNOT-20 score. In the patient group an additional acoustic rhinometry and a clinical examination of the nose were performed. Results: With a mean of 25% (SD = 20%) the proportion of mouth breathing in patients with NAO did not differ significantly from the proportion in controls without NAO, with a mean of 27% (SD = 23%). Analysis of subjective scores revealed a significant reduction of subjective symptoms after septoplasty. A higher preoperative proportion of mouth breathing correlated with more remaining postoperative NAO. Conclusions: The percentage of mouth breathing is no different in patients with symptomatic septal deviation than in control patients. Mouth breathing in patients with NAO, evaluated for septoplasty, could be a negative predictive factor for patient satisfaction after nasal septoplasty. Mouth breathing in these patients should be observed carefully because more preoperative mouth breathing should make one more hesitant to consider septoplasty.","PeriodicalId":74737,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/21.045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: No reliable marker exists to predict septoplasty outcome. Most patients suffering from nasal airway obstruction (NAO) caused by a deviation of the nasal septum report a bothersome mouth breathing and dryness. In this study our aim was to assess, whether mouth breathing could be objectified in these patients and whether mouth breathing could predict septoplasty outcome. Methods: A monocentric, prospective case-control study of 21 patients was conducted. The proportion of mouth breathing was measured in a blinded manner. As a measurement of patient satisfaction, subjective symptoms pre- and postoperatively, were assessed by using VAS, NOSE and SNOT-20 score. In the patient group an additional acoustic rhinometry and a clinical examination of the nose were performed. Results: With a mean of 25% (SD = 20%) the proportion of mouth breathing in patients with NAO did not differ significantly from the proportion in controls without NAO, with a mean of 27% (SD = 23%). Analysis of subjective scores revealed a significant reduction of subjective symptoms after septoplasty. A higher preoperative proportion of mouth breathing correlated with more remaining postoperative NAO. Conclusions: The percentage of mouth breathing is no different in patients with symptomatic septal deviation than in control patients. Mouth breathing in patients with NAO, evaluated for septoplasty, could be a negative predictive factor for patient satisfaction after nasal septoplasty. Mouth breathing in these patients should be observed carefully because more preoperative mouth breathing should make one more hesitant to consider septoplasty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口呼吸-鼻中隔成形术后患者满意度的预测指标?
背景:没有可靠的标志物可以预测鼻中隔成形术的结果。大多数鼻中隔偏曲引起的鼻气道阻塞(NAO)患者报告说,口腔呼吸困难和干燥。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估这些患者的口腔呼吸是否可以客观化,以及口腔呼吸是否能够预测鼻中隔成形术的结果。方法:对21例患者进行单中心前瞻性病例对照研究。口腔呼吸的比例是以盲法测量的。作为患者满意度的衡量标准,通过VAS、NOSE和SNOT-20评分来评估术前和术后的主观症状。在患者组中,进行了额外的鼻声学测量和鼻临床检查。结果:NAO患者的口腔呼吸比例平均为25%(SD=20%),与无NAO的对照组相比,无显著差异,平均为27%(SD=23%)。主观评分分析显示,鼻中隔成形术后主观症状显著减轻。术前口腔呼吸的比例越高,术后剩余NAO越多。结论:有症状的房间隔偏移患者的口呼吸百分比与对照组患者没有差异。鼻中隔成形术后评估NAO患者的口呼吸可能是患者满意度的负面预测因素。这些患者的口腔呼吸应该仔细观察,因为术前更多的口腔呼吸会让人更加犹豫是否考虑鼻中隔成形术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 control protocol for rhinologic surgery Trends in dupilumab persistence among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Dupilumab as an emerging treatment for refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a case series and literature review Capturing qualitative olfactory dysfunction with PARPHAIT: the parosmia, phantosmia, and anosmia test Prevalence of smell and taste dysfunction in different clinical severity groups of COVID-19 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1