Command, Control and Co-Creation: Drivers and Barriers Faced by Professionals Co-Creating in the Slovenian Public Sector

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Central European Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.17573/cepar.2022.1.02
Sanja Vrbek, Marlot Kuiper
{"title":"Command, Control and Co-Creation: Drivers and Barriers Faced by Professionals Co-Creating in the Slovenian Public Sector","authors":"Sanja Vrbek, Marlot Kuiper","doi":"10.17573/cepar.2022.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The academic contribution to the field is twofold. Firstly, the paper identifies co-creation drivers and barriers from the professionals’ point of view ‒ a largely overlooked perspective in the relevant literature. Secondly, by being placed in the Slovenian administrative context, the paper complements and enriches the debate on co-creation shaped predominantly by the experience of Northern and Western Europe. \nPurpose: By focusing on the Slovenian public sector, as a traditionally hierarchical administrative context, the paper aims to identify factors that stimulate professionals to implement co-creation in their everyday work, as well as factors that impede their decision and behaviour in this direction. \nDesign/methodology/approach: The paper relies on two Slovenian case studies capturing the experience of professionals from the Ministry of Public Administration and the Municipality of Ljubljana. The key data-gathering methods were qualitative open-ended interviews with ‘lead professionals’ (at managerial positions) and focus groups with professionals who have regular contact with service users/external stakeholders and/or experience with co-creation. \nFindings: The findings of the paper indicate that professionals implement co-creation even in ‘unfavourable’ hierarchical and centralised settings. A key driver for them to co-create in such a context is strong political support at the highest level. However, a more profound internalisation of co-creation depends on the redefinition of their professional identity, as well as on the (personal or collective/organisational) interest in co-creation. \nOriginality/significance: The paper makes a pioneer step in providing an in-depth look into the drivers and barriers professionals face when implementing co-creation in the Slovenian public sector. As such, it provides valuable input for further comparative analyses of co-creation drivers and barriers faced by professionals across Central and Eastern Europe.","PeriodicalId":53802,"journal":{"name":"Central European Public Administration Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2022.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The academic contribution to the field is twofold. Firstly, the paper identifies co-creation drivers and barriers from the professionals’ point of view ‒ a largely overlooked perspective in the relevant literature. Secondly, by being placed in the Slovenian administrative context, the paper complements and enriches the debate on co-creation shaped predominantly by the experience of Northern and Western Europe. Purpose: By focusing on the Slovenian public sector, as a traditionally hierarchical administrative context, the paper aims to identify factors that stimulate professionals to implement co-creation in their everyday work, as well as factors that impede their decision and behaviour in this direction. Design/methodology/approach: The paper relies on two Slovenian case studies capturing the experience of professionals from the Ministry of Public Administration and the Municipality of Ljubljana. The key data-gathering methods were qualitative open-ended interviews with ‘lead professionals’ (at managerial positions) and focus groups with professionals who have regular contact with service users/external stakeholders and/or experience with co-creation. Findings: The findings of the paper indicate that professionals implement co-creation even in ‘unfavourable’ hierarchical and centralised settings. A key driver for them to co-create in such a context is strong political support at the highest level. However, a more profound internalisation of co-creation depends on the redefinition of their professional identity, as well as on the (personal or collective/organisational) interest in co-creation. Originality/significance: The paper makes a pioneer step in providing an in-depth look into the drivers and barriers professionals face when implementing co-creation in the Slovenian public sector. As such, it provides valuable input for further comparative analyses of co-creation drivers and barriers faced by professionals across Central and Eastern Europe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指挥、控制和共创:专业人员在斯洛文尼亚公共部门共创面临的驱动因素和障碍
学术界对该领域的贡献是双重的。首先,本文从专业人士的角度确定了共同创造的驱动因素和障碍——这在相关文献中被忽视了。其次,该文件放在斯洛文尼亚的行政背景下,补充和丰富了主要由北欧和西欧经验形成的关于共同创造的辩论。目的:通过关注斯洛文尼亚公共部门,作为一个传统的等级管理背景,本文旨在确定激励专业人员在日常工作中实施共同创造的因素,以及阻碍他们在这方面做出决定和行为的因素。设计/方法/方法:该论文以斯洛文尼亚的两个案例研究为基础,收集了公共行政部和卢布尔雅那市专业人员的经验。关键的数据收集方法是对“主要专业人员”(担任管理职务)进行定性开放式访谈,并对与服务用户/外部利益相关者有定期联系和/或有共同创建经验的专业人员进行焦点小组访谈。研究结果:论文的研究结果表明,即使在“不利”的层级和集中环境中,专业人士也会实施共同创造。在这种背景下,他们共同创造的一个关键驱动力是最高级别的强大政治支持。然而,共同创造更深刻的内在化取决于对其职业身份的重新定义,以及对共同创造的(个人或集体/组织)兴趣。独创性/意义:该论文迈出了开拓性的一步,深入了解了专业人士在斯洛文尼亚公共部门实施共创时面临的驱动因素和障碍。因此,它为进一步比较分析中欧和东欧专业人员面临的共同创造驱动因素和障碍提供了宝贵的投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Absence of an Oral Hearing in Administrative Disputes: Business’ Attitudes Towards Corruption in Selected Central European Countries Selflessness: An International Comparative Analysis of a Much-Needed Public Value Does Context Matter? Governance Models in Local Administration Trends in the Digitalisation of Public Administrations – in Light of EU Legislation and Domestic Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1