Stratagems and the Byzantine culture of war: the theory of military trickery and ethics in Byzantium (c. 900–1204)

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1515/bz-2022-0041
Georgios Chatzelis
{"title":"Stratagems and the Byzantine culture of war: the theory of military trickery and ethics in Byzantium (c. 900–1204)","authors":"Georgios Chatzelis","doi":"10.1515/bz-2022-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although there has been significant scholarly attention on just war (jus ad bellum) in Byzantium and an increasing interest in the study of the Byzantine culture of war, military trickery and jus in bello (just conduct of war) remain largely unexplored by Byzantinists. This paper aims to fill this gap by studying the theory of military trickery and ethics in Byzantium, c. 900 -1204. It explores and analyses this aspect of jus in bello in Byzantium by employing methods and concepts from Byzantine history, war studies and military ethics. The paper begins by examining the impact of dominant literary traditions (Classical and Biblical) on Byzantine perceptions of military trickery, and then explores the reception and development of Classical and Biblical notions of military trickery and ethics by different sub-cultures in Byzantium (e. g., theologians, jurists, tacticians, historians, orators, poets). The author then attempts to frame a more complete theory of Byzantine military trickery and ethics, and to reflect on the relationship between jus ad bellum and jus in bello in Byzantium.","PeriodicalId":44281,"journal":{"name":"BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT","volume":"115 1","pages":"719 - 768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bz-2022-0041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Although there has been significant scholarly attention on just war (jus ad bellum) in Byzantium and an increasing interest in the study of the Byzantine culture of war, military trickery and jus in bello (just conduct of war) remain largely unexplored by Byzantinists. This paper aims to fill this gap by studying the theory of military trickery and ethics in Byzantium, c. 900 -1204. It explores and analyses this aspect of jus in bello in Byzantium by employing methods and concepts from Byzantine history, war studies and military ethics. The paper begins by examining the impact of dominant literary traditions (Classical and Biblical) on Byzantine perceptions of military trickery, and then explores the reception and development of Classical and Biblical notions of military trickery and ethics by different sub-cultures in Byzantium (e. g., theologians, jurists, tacticians, historians, orators, poets). The author then attempts to frame a more complete theory of Byzantine military trickery and ethics, and to reflect on the relationship between jus ad bellum and jus in bello in Byzantium.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略与拜占庭战争文化:拜占庭的军事骗术和伦理理论(约900-1204年)
虽然拜占庭的正义战争(jus ad bellum)已经得到了大量的学术关注,并且对拜占庭战争文化的研究越来越感兴趣,但军事欺骗和jus in bello(战争的正义行为)在很大程度上仍未被拜占庭人探索。本文旨在通过研究公元900 -1204年拜占庭的军事欺骗和伦理理论来填补这一空白。它通过运用拜占庭历史、战争研究和军事伦理学的方法和概念,探索和分析了拜占庭的这方面的战权。本文首先考察了占主导地位的文学传统(古典和圣经)对拜占庭人对军事欺骗的看法的影响,然后探讨了拜占庭不同亚文化(如神学家、法学家、战术家、历史学家、演说家、诗人)对古典和圣经中军事欺骗和道德观念的接受和发展。在此基础上,笔者试图构建一个较为完整的拜占庭军事骗术与伦理理论,并对拜占庭的战时法与战时法之间的关系进行反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT
BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Steeped in tradition, this organ of international Byzantine studies covers literature, history and art history, including the related and peripheral disciplines, equally in all sections (essays, reviews, bibliographies) and thus contributes significantly to the support and development of Byzantine Studies.
期刊最新文献
Of tortoise necks and dialects. A new edition of the Grammaticus Leidensis Constantin VII Porphyrogénète, Le livre des cérémonies, bespr. von Marek Jankowiak Το θέμα Θεσσαλονίκης (1259 – 1341). Συμβολή στη μελέτη της φορολογικής διοίκησης των επαρχιών κατά την πρώιμη παλαιολόγεια περίοδο, bespr. von Kostis Smyrlis Patria 3.8. and echoes of Byzantine military manuals The capacity for self-sufficiency of Middle Byzantine urban settlements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1